BiasiM. (2015) ‘Statutory employee representation at the workplace in Italy and in the US: a comparative analysis of the Fiat/Chrysler case’, Labor Law Journal, 4, 233–255.
2.
BiasiM.TuzetG. (2016) ‘From Judge-made Law to Scholar-made Law? The strange Case of Employment-at-Will in the US’, Biblioteca della Libertà, 2, 7–22.
3.
CountourisN.KoukiadakiA. (2017) ‘The glass half full: collective redundancies, public interest, and the (unfulfilled) potential of Europe’s “highly competitive social market economy”’, 153(1), 193–201.
4.
DavidovG. (2016) A Purposive Approach to Labour Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
DavidovG. (2020a) ‘Review to Principled Labor Law: U.S. Labor Law Through a Latin American Method’, Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, forthcoming.
EstlundC.L. (2002) ‘The Ossification of American Labor Law’, Columbia Law Review, 102(6), 1527–1612.
8.
Kahn-FreundO. (1974) ‘On the Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’, Modern Law Review, 37(1), 1–27.
9.
Kahn-FreundO. (1967) ‘A note on status and contract in British Labour Law’, Modern Law Review, 30(6), 635–644.
10.
VenezianiB. (1986) ‘The Evolution of the Contract of Employment’, in HeppleB. (ed.), The Making of Labour Law in Europe, Portland: Hart, 31–72.
11.
WaasB. (2017) ‘Comparative overview’, in WaasB.Heerma van VossG. (eds.), Restatement of Labour Law in Europe, I, The Concept of Employee, Portland: Hart, xxvii–lxvii
