This study outlines and compares the possible ways of reforming modern, pay-as-you-go (PAYG) pension systems – reforms which are necessitated by unfavourable demographic processes. This comparison is made in a general context and the examination does not focus on any specific country. Pension reform ideas usually stay within the pension paradigm outlined by Samuelson (‘AI scenario’). While also describing these approaches, the study points out – citing lesser-known ideas in this context – that there are several ways out of the situation. There is an alternative to Samuelson's framework within the pension paradigm (pension reform based on the ‘IAI scenario’), but the problems can also be managed starting from that framework, by redistributing available job opportunities or introducing a basic income. However, one country, independently of the others, may not choose one of these alternatives.
BanyárJ. (2011) A nyugdíjreform miatti államháztartási hiány elszámolhatósága – A stabilitási és növekedési egyezmény egyes követelményeinek újragondolása, Közgazdasági Szemle, LVIII (July-August), 666–688.
5.
BanyárJ. (2012) ‘Gyereknevelés es nyugdíj – összekapcsolható, vagy sem?’, in KovácsE. (ed.) Nyugdíj és gyermekvállalás – Tanulmánykötet, Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó.
6.
BanyárJ. (2014a) European handling of implicit and explicit government debt as an obstacle to pension reform, in 'Pension adequacy and sustainability. Report of the conference of the Central Administration of National Pension Insurance organized in cooperation with the Ministry of Human Resources and the Hungarian Ministry for National Economy, Budapest.
BanyárJ. (2015) Consequences of cross-border human capital transfers on national PAYG systems, in European pension system: Fantasy or reality, Report of the conference of the Central Administration of National Pension Insurance organised in cooperation with the International Social Security Association European Network held in Budapest, Hungary on 19th September, 85–94.
BanyárJ. and MészárosJ. (2009) A possible and desirable pension system, Social Science Monographs, Boulder, CO: Center for Hungarian Studies and Publications, distributed by Columbia University Press, New York.
11.
BanyárJ. and MészárosJ. (forthcoming) ‘The child as a pension public good – private load problem and its alternative solutions’, International Social Security Review.
HolzmannR. and PalmerE., (eds.) (2006) Pension Reform – Issues and Prospects for Non-Financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
21.
HolzmannR.PalmerE. and RobalinoD., (eds.) (2012–2013) Nonfinancial Defined Contribution Pension Schemes in a Changing Pension World I-II, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
PósaT. (2014) Kevesebbet, de tovább dolgozunk a jövőben, Magyar Nemzet (Hungarian National Bank), 30 July, 16.
32.
PoterbaJ. (2001) ‘Demographic Structure and Asset Returns’, Review of Economics and Statistics, LXXXIII(4), 565–584.
33.
RajcsányiG. (2014) Az alapjövedelem utópiájáról, Heti Válasz, 20 February.
34.
SamuelsonP.A. (1958) ‘An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money’, Journal of Political Economy, LXVI(6). 468–482.
35.
SkidelskyR. and SkidelskyE. (2014) Mennyi az elég? A pénz imádata – Érvek a jó élet mellett (How Much is Enough? Money and the Good Life), Budapest: Corvina.
36.
VonderbourghtY. and ParijsP.V. (2014) Alapjövedelem, Budapest: L'Harmattan.
37.
WalkerT. (2007) ‘Why Economists Dislike a Lump of Labor’, Review of Social Economy, LXV(3). 279–291.
38.
World Bank (1994) Averting the Old Age Crisis, Washington, DC: World Bank. 25-50-75 (2014) A LÉT – ajánlat a magyar társadalomnak, 11 January 2014, available at: http://255075.hu/upload/tanulmany.pdf.
