Responses from the Frontline: How Organisations and Street-Level Bureaucrats Deal with Economic Sanctions

Abstract

Economic sanctions have gained more political legitimacy and are being more widely used as a tool to improve the willingness of unemployed welfare recipients to participate in activities within the framework of active labour market policy (ALMP). The focus of this article is the use of economic sanctions on cash benefit recipients in Denmark, Quantitative analyses show a substantial increase in the use of economic sanctions in Denmark, including sanctions on those who are categorised as having problems in addition to unemployment. In this article we will direct our attention to responses from both the organisational and individual level regarding the implementation of sanctions. Empirical material consists of interviews with managers and frontline social workers in municipalities with a high number of sanctions. We argue that organisations matter in shaping street-level behaviour, resulting in substantial differences in the use of sanctions from one municipality to another.

Keywords

economic sanctions organisational practices social work street-level organisation unemployed

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbring

J.C.

and Van Ours

J.H.

(2005) ‘The Effect of Unemployed Insurance Sanctions on the Transition Rate from Unemployment to Employment’ Economic Journal, 115, 602–630.

Bigby

and Files

(2003) ‘Street-Level Leniency or Unjust Inconsistency? An Examination of Brach Recommendation Decision Making in a for profit Job Network Agency’ Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 6(2), 277–291.

Brodkin

E.Z.

(2008) Accountability in Street-Level Organizations' International Journal of Public Administration, 31, 317–336.

Brodkin

E.Z.

(2011) ‘Policy Work: Street-Level Organizations Under New Managerialism’ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 253–277.

Butler

Alson

Bloom

Deitch

Hill

Hsueh

and Redcross

(2012) What Strategies Work for the Hard-to-Employ? Final Results of the Hard-to-Employ Demonstration and Evaluation Project and Selected Sites from the Employment Retention and Advancement Project. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE) Report, 8.

Caswell

Andersen

H.L.

Høybye-Mortensen

Markussen

A.M.

and Thuesen

S.L.

(2011) Når kassen smækkes i: Analyser af økonomiske sanktioner over for kontanthjælpsmodtagere. [Economic Sanctions Towards Cash Benefit Recipients – Analysing the Danish Case], København: AKF.

Caswell

and Høybye-Mortensen (2011) ‘Så smækker vi kassen ü: Sanktion som redskab i kommunernes håndtering af kontanthjælpsmodtagere’ [No more money coming your way! Punitive Sanctions as a tool in Municipal Frontline Bureaucracies]. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv. 4, 21–38.

Caswell

(2013) ‘Socialt arbejde på beskæftigelsesområdet: – arbejdsløse, aktive tilbud og sanktioner’ in Guldager

and Skytte

(eds), Socialt arbejde, København: Akademisk Forlag, 222–249.

Dubois

(2010) The Bureaucrat and the Poor. Encounters in French Welfare Offices. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

10.

Dworkin

(1978) Taking Rights Seriously. London: Duckwort.

11.

Flyvbjerg

(2006) ‘Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research’ Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

12.

Hammerschmid

Van de Walle

and Stimac

(2013) Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: Results from an international survey’, Public Money and Management, 33(4), 261–268.

13.

Hupe

and Hill

(2007) ‘Street-level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability’ Public Administration, 85(2) pp. 279–299.

14.

Jensen

Rosholm

and Svarer

(2003) ‘The response of youth unemployment to benefits, incentives, and sanctions’ European Journal of Political Economy, 19(2), 301–316.

15.

Jørgensen

Baadsgaard

Nørup

and Olesen

S.P.

(2014) Den faglige praksis i jobcentrene. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

16.

Kvist

and Pedersen

(2007) ‘Danish labour market activation policies’ National Institute Economic Review, 202(1), 99–112.

17.

Lalive

van Ours

J.C.

and Zweimüller

(2005) ‘The Effect of Benefit Sanctions on the Duration of Unemployment’ Journal of the European Economic Association, 3, 1386–1417.

18.

Larsen

(2011) ‘Ny beskæftigelsespolitik via administrative reformer?’ Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 4, 40–55.

19.

Larsen

(2013) ‘Active labour market reform in Denmark: The role of governance in policy change’, in Brodkin

E.Z.

and Marston

(eds.) Work and the Welfare State: The Politics and Management of Policy Change, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press and Copenhagen; DJØF Publishing, 103–123.

20.

Larsen

and Bredgaard

(2009) ‘Redesigning the governance of employment policies: Decentralised centralisation in municipal jobcentres’, in van Berkel

and Larsen

F.F.

(eds.) The New Governance and Implementation of Labour Market Policies. Copenhagen: Djøf / Jurist- og Økonomforbundet, 45–69.

21.

Lipsky

(1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of Individuals in Public Service, New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

22.

May

and Winter

(2007) ‘Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy Implementation’, Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 19(3), 453–476.

23.

Mead

L.M.

(1998) ‘Telling the Poor What to Do’ The Public Interest, 132, pp. 97–112

24.

Meso

and Smith

(2000) ‘A resource-based view of organizational knowledgemanagement systems’ Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3), 224–234.

25.

Ministery of Employment [Beskæftigelsesministeriet] (2013) Everybody can be of use. [Alle kan øre nytte] Reform of the cash benefit system, available at: http://bm.dk/∼/media/BEM/Files/Dokumenter/Pressemeddelelser/2013/Kontanthjaelp_april/Aftaletekst_kontanthjaelpsreform%20pdf.ashx.

26.

Molander

and Terum

L.I.

, (eds) (2010) Profesjonsstudier, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

27.

Møller

M.Ø.

and Stone

(2012) ‘Disciplining Disability under Danish Active Labour Market Policy’, Social Policy and Administration, 47(5), 586–604.

28.

Rosdahl

and Petersen

K.N.

(2006) Modtagere af kontanthjælp. En litteraturoversigt om kontanthjælpsmodtagere og den offentlige indsats for at hjælpe dem, København: SFI.

29.

Rosholm

and Svarer

(2008) ‘The Threat Effect of Active Labour Market Programmes’, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2), 385–401.

30.

Sandfort

(2000) ‘Moving Beyond Discretion and Outcomes: Examining Public Management from the Front Lines of the Welfare System’, Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 10(4), 729–756

31.

Schram

and Silverman

(2012) ‘The End of Social Work: Neoliberalizing Social Policy Implementation’, Critical Policy Studies, 6(2) 128–145.

32.

Skipper

(2010) En mikroøkonometrisk evaluering af den aktive beskæftigelsesindsats, København: AKF Forlaget.

33.

Thuesen

Kløft

Schademan

S.J.

Holt

and Høst

(2009) A-kasserne og den aktive beskæftigelsespolitik, København: SFI-Det nationale forskningscenter for velfærd.

34.

Soldatic

and Pini

(2012) ‘Continuity or Change? Disability Policy and the Rudd, Government’, Social Policy and Society, 11, 183–196.

35.

Soss

Fording

and Schram

S.F.

(2011a) Disciplining the Poor. Neoliberal paternalism and the persistent power of race, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

36.

Soss

Fording

and Schram

S.F.

(2011b) ‘The Organization of Discipline: From Performance Management to Perversity and Punishment’ Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 21, 203–232.

37.

Svarer

(2011) ‘The Effect of Sanctions on Exit from Unemployment: Evidence from Denmark’ Economica, 78, 751–778.

38.

van Berkel

(2013) ‘Triple Activation: Introducing Welfare-to-Work into Dutch Social Assistance’, in Brodkin

E.Z.

and Marston

(eds.) Work and the Welfare State. Street Level Organizations and Workfare Politics, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press and Copenhagen; DJØF Publishing, 87–102.

39.

Van der Klaauw

and Van Ours

J.C.

(2013) ‘Carrot and Stick: How re-employment bonuses and benefit sanctions affect exit rates from welfare’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 28(2), 275–296.

40.

VEJ (2010) Vejledning om ændrede rådigheds- og sanktionsregler for kontanthjælpsmodtagere, available at: www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=19282

41.

Winter

(2002) ‘Explaining street-level bureaucratic behavior in social and regulatory policies’, Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association in Boston, 29.