Social Security Administration Confronting Sustainability Challenges the Greek Pension System from a Comparative Perspective

Abstract

This paper explores sustainability in social security, placing a particular emphasis on pension funds. The article starts by presenting various elements involved in a pension scheme. After defining the problem regarding the fiscal challenges with which pensions are confronted, both at international and at EU level, the research concentrates on tracking down the mix of instruments underlying a pension scheme which is best able to deal with the imbalances within it. Such imbalances have become very intensive since the economic crisis of 2008. A potential classification of pension schemes is provided, and the ways in which the public and private sectors may interact within the identified categories are outlined. The main focus of our analysis is on the management and asset allocation of pension funds, and comparisons are made between different practices in order to identify which are most suitable for ensuring sustainability. Finally, Greece is placed under the microscope, and the parameters affecting the administration of its pension system are examined from both an economic and a legal perspective.

Keywords

administration asset allocation management PAYG-funded public-private social-financial sustainability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramovitz

(1986) ‘The Privatisation of the Welfare State’, Social Work 34(4), 257–64.

Amman

and Singg

(2008) ‘Investment Performance of Swiss Pension Funds and Investment Foundations’, Working Paper, University of St. Gallen.

Anderson

(2005) ‘Pension reform in Sweden: Radical reform in a mature pension system’, in Bonoli

and Shinkawa

(eds.) Ageing and Pension Reform around the World, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 94–115.

Angelidis

and Tessaromatis

(2010) ‘The efficiency of Greek public pension fund portfolios’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 2158–2167.

Borzutzky

(2005) ‘From Chicago to Santiago: Neo-liberalism and Social Security Privatisation in Child Governance’, International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 18(4), 655–674.

Buiter

Corsetti

and Roubini

(1993) ‘Excessive deficits: Sense and Nonsense in the Treaty of Maastricht’, Economic Policy 16, in Editorial Comments (2004) Common Market Law Review 41, 1193–1198.

Cantillon

Verschueren

and Van Mechelen

(2011) Towards a Minimum Income Protection in Europe: Budgetary and Political Obstacles to Overcome’, European Journal of Social Security 13(4), 453–479.

Culyer

A.J.

(1980/1991) The Political Economy of Social Policy, Oxford: Martin Robertson/Aldershot: Gower.

de Dreu

and Bikker

(2009) ‘Pension fund sophistication and investment policy’, Working Paper 211, De Nederlandsche Bank.

10.

Dedouli

(2010) ‘Social Security Institution's Assets. Are they a solution to the problem?’, available at www.epkodi.gr.

11.

Dekkers

Buslei

Cozzolino

Desmet

Geyer

Hofmann

Raitano

Steiner

Tanda

Tedeschi

and Verschueren

(2010) ‘The Flip of the Coin: The Consequences of the European Budgetary Projections on the Adequacy of Social Security Pensions’, European Journal of Social Security, 12(2), 94–143.

12.

Diller

(2002) ‘Going Private-The Future of Social Welfare Policy?’, Clearinghouse Review 35, 491–507.

13.

Disney

(2000) ‘Declining public pensions in an area of demographic ageing: Will private provision fill the gap?’, Discussion Paper in Economics No. 99/27, University of Nottingham.

14.

Dixon

(2000) ‘A global ranking of national social security systems’, International Social Security Review 53(1), 109–122.

15.

Einerhand

and Nekkers

(2004) ‘Modernisation de la sécurité sociale: Changer les responsabilités et le choix individuel’, Revue International de Sécurité Sociale 3, 29–50.

16.

European Commission (EPC Secretariat, SPC Secretariat) (2010a) ‘Joint Report on Pensions Progress and key challenges in the delivery of adequate and sustainable pensions in Europe- Country-profiles’, available at http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/occasional_paper/2010/pdf/ocp71_country_profiles_en.pdf.

17.

European Commission (Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Units E2 and E4) (2010b) ‘Joint Report on Social Protection and Social Inclusion, on the basis of COM/2010/25 final, SEC(2010)98 final and SEC(2010)99 final, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

18.

European Commission (2012a) Report prepared jointly by the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission and the Social Protection Committee: ‘Pension Adequacy in the European Union 2010–2050’, 9.

19.

European Commission (2012b) ‘White Paper: An Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions’, 4–5.

20.

European Parliament. Directorate General for Internal Policies-Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy (2011) ‘Pension systems in the EU – contingent liabilities and assets in the public and private sector’, 10–33, available at www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies.do?language=EN.

21.

European Federation for Retirement Provision (EFPR) (1996) Pension Fund Assets, London.

22.

Fox

and Palmer

(2001) ‘New approaches to multi-pillar pension systems: What in the world is going on?’, in Holzmann

and Stiglitz

(eds.) New ideas about old age security, The World Bank, Washington, 90–127.

23.

Giamouridis

(2010) ‘Strategic Asset Allocation of Public Pension Funds: The modern standard’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 52, 486–491.

24.

Gilbert

(2004) Transformation of the Welfare State, The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

25.

Gillion

(2000) ‘The development and reform of social security pensions: The approach of the International Labor Office’, International Social Security Review 53(1), 35–63.

26.

Glendinning

Powell

and Rummery

(2002) Partnerships, New Labour and the governance of welfare, Bristol: The Policy Press.

27.

Griffin

and Tversky

(1992) ‘The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence, Cognitive Psychology 24, 411–435.

28.

Grimsey

and Lewis

(2004) Public-private partnerships. The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance, Cheltenham – Northampton: Edward Elgar.

29.

Hanusch

(ed.) (1983) Anatomy of Government Deficiencies, Berlin: Springer Verlag.

30.

Holzmann

(2000) ‘The World Bank Approach to pension reform’, International Social Security Review 53(1), 11–34.

31.

Hujo

(2004) Soziale Sicherung im Kontext von Stabilisierung und Strukturanpassung. Die Reform der Rentenversicherung in Argentinien, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

32.

Impavido

(2011) ‘The Impact of the Crisis on Pension Funds’, available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1744298 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1744298.

33.

ISSA Study Group on the Investment of Social Security Funds (2004) ‘Guidelines for the investment of social security funds’, Technical Report 13, Geneva: International Social Security Association.

34.

Johnson

(1995) (ed.) Private Markets in Health and Welfare, Oxford, Berg Publishers.

35.

Jung

C.L.

and Walker

(2009) ‘The Impact of Neo-liberalism on South Korea's Public Pension: A Political Economy of Pension Reform’, Social Policy and Administration 43(5), 425–444.

36.

Kamerman

S.B.

and Kahn

(1989) (eds.) Privatisation and the Welfare State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

37.

Karlsson

and Norden

(2007) ‘Home Sweet Home: Home Bias and International. Diversification among Individual Investors’, Journal of Banking and Finance 31(2), 317–333.

38.

Katrougalos

(1996) ‘The implementation of social rights in Europe’, Columbia Journal of European Law 2, 277–312.

39.

Katrougalos

(2007) ‘The Privatisation of Social Insurance and its Effects on Social Integration’, European Journal of Social Security 9(1), 79–95.

40.

Katrougalos

(2010) ‘Constitutional Limitations of Social Security Privatisation: A Human Rights Approach”, European Journal of Social Security 12(1), 16–40.

41.

Kintis

(2010) ‘The contribution of proper asset management of social security carriers in social security sustainability’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 52, 427–432.

42.

Kremalis

(1985) Social Insurance Law, Sakkoula: Athens-Komotini.

43.

Leimgruber

(1994) ‘The historical roots of a diffusion process: The three-pillar doctrine and European pension debates (1972–1994)’, Global Social Policy, 12(1), 22–44.

44.

Littig

and Griessler

(2005) ‘Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory”, International Journal of Sustainable Development 8(1–2), 65–79.

45.

McGillivray

(2000) ‘Pension reform: Where are we now?’, International Social Security Review 53(1), 3–10.

46.

Mesa-Lago

(2008) ‘Social Protection in Chile: Reforms to improve equity’, International Labour Review 147(4), 377–402.

47.

Milonas

Papachristou

and Roupas

(2004) ‘On Improving the Greek Social Security System via Equity Investment”, Paper presented at EFMA Basel Meetings.

48.

Milonas

Papachristou

and Roupas

(2010) ‘Pension Funds under Investments Constraints: An Assessment of the Opportunity Cost to the Greek Social Security System’, MPRA Paper No. 36702, available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/36702/.

49.

Moore

M.H.

(1995) Creating Public Value. Strategic Management in Government, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

50.

Mouzoulas

(2010) ‘“Pension Institutions” Assets Investment: Social Security and Financial Speculation’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 52, 457–465.

51.

Müller

(2006) ‘Die Privatisierung der Alterssicherung Erfahrungen aus Lateinamerika und Osteuropa’, Deutsche Rentenversicherung 61(7–8), 423–437.

52.

Nectarios

(2007) ‘Social Security Funds Assets Investment through the Globalisation Framework’, SPOUDAI (Journal of Economics and Business) 57(1), 80–97.

53.

OECD (2008) Les partenariats public-privé. Partager les risques et optimiser les ressources, Paris.

54.

OECD (2009a) ‘Social Policy Division, Pensions and the Crisis- How should retirement-income respond to financial and economic pressures?’, Paris, available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/10/26/43060101.pdf.

55.

OECD (2009b) ‘Pension Markets in Focus’, Issue 6, Paris, available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/30/40/43943964.pdf.

56.

OECD (2010) ‘Pension Markets in Focus’, Issue 7, Paris, available at www.oecd.org/dataoecd/46/46/45637367.pdf.

57.

OECD (2011) ‘Pensions at a Glance 2011 Retirement-income systems in OECD and G20 countries’, Paris, available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/pension_glance-2011-en.

58.

OECD (2011b) ‘Pension Markets in Focus’, Issue 8, Paris.

59.

OECD (2012) OECD Pensions Outlook 2012: Retirement-income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries, Paris.

60.

Orenstein

(2008) Privatising Pensions. The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

61.

Paparrigopoulou-Pechlivanidi

(2011) ‘The distinction between basic pension and contributory pension: The paradoxes of the recent reform to the Greek pension scheme (Laws 3863 and 3865/2010)’, Pensions 16(1), 51–62.

62.

Pedersen

(1997) ‘Do Generous Public Pensions Crowd out Private Pensions? Comparative Analysis of Time Series Data for Denmark and Norway’, Working Paper 7, Copenhagen: Centre for Welfare State Research, Danish National Institute for Social Research.

63.

Petroglou

(1983) ‘The State is responsible for the proper function of all the social security institutions’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 25, 194.

64.

Petroglou

(2010) ‘Utilisation of the Social Security Funds Assets: Is it a solution to the problem?’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 52, 417–418, available at www.ppm.nu.

65.

Protonotarios

(2010) ‘Management and Utilisation of the Social Security Real Estate Assets’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 52, 475–479.

66.

Rofman

Fajnylber

and Herrera

(2008) Reforming the pension reforms: The recent initiatives and actions on pensions in Argentina and Chile, Washington, DC: World Bank.

67.

Roupas

(2010) ‘Historical Valuation and the Role of Reserves in the Greek Social Security System’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 52, 433–456.

68.

Sakellaropoulos

, (2007) ‘Greece: The quest for national welfare expansion through more social Europe’, in Kvist

and Saari

(2007) (eds.) The Europeanisation of social protection. The political responses of eleven Member States, Bristol, Policy Press, 211–227.

69.

Sender

(2009a) ‘The European pension fund industry again beset by deficits’, EDHEC-Risk Institute Publication (May).

70.

Sepulveda

(2003) The Nature of the Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Antwerp: Intersentia.

71.

Sol

(2010) ‘Public-Private Partnerships for the Unemployed’, European Journal of Social Security 12(1), 41.

72.

Stergiou

(2005) ‘The right to Social Insurance – Equivalence versus Solidarity’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 47, 161–179.

73.

Stergiou

(2009) ‘Public-Private Partnerships in Statutory Systems: A New Interaction between the Public and the Private Sectors’, Deltio Ergatikis Nomothesias (Review of Labour Law), 68, 1321–1385.

74.

Stergiou

(2010) ‘Clarifying the objectives of our pension system’ in Stergiou

and Sakellaropoulos

(eds.) Insurance Reform, Athens: Dionikos.

75.

Stergiou

(2012) The Principle of Equality in Social Insurance’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 54, 1–357.

76.

Stergiou

(2013) ‘The Reductions on the Old-Age Pension Benefits under the view of the Article 1 of the First Protocol of the ECHR’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 55, 23–34.

77.

Tausch

(2004) ‘World Bank Pension reforms and development patterns in the world system and in the “Wider Europe”, paper prepared for the Conference on Reforming European Pension Systems. 24 and 25 September 2004, Luxemburg, Institute for European and International Studies.

78.

Tessaromatis

(2010) ‘Public Pension Funds Assets Administration: International and Greek Experience’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 52, 480–485.

79.

Tessaromatis

(2013) ‘Managing Public Pension Reserves: Greek and International Experience’, EPKODI (Union for the Protection of Social Rights), available at www.edekt.gr/link2.html.

80.

The Ageing Report (2009) ‘Economic and budgetary projections for the EU-27 Member States (2008–2060)’, Joint Report prepared by the European Commission (DG ECFIN) and the Economic Policy Committee (AWG) EUROPEAN ECONOMY 2.

81.

The Ageing Report (2012) “Economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU Member States (2010–2060)”, Joint Report prepared by the European Commission (DG ECFIN) and the Economic Policy Committee (AWG) EUROPEAN ECONOMY 2, 10–12, 26.

82.

The Social Protection Committee (2008) ‘Privately managed funded pension provision and their contribution to adequate and sustainable pensions adopted’, 4–7.

83.

Tinios

(2010) ‘“Funds” Assets and Social Security; a Diachronic Misunderstanding and its Effects’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 52, 420–426.

84.

Vasilakopoulos

(2010) ‘The responsibilities of those managing the reserves of the social security funds and these of the auditing bodies’, Epitheorisis Dikaiou Koinonikis Asfalisis, (Review of Social Security Law), 52, 470–454.

85.

Vonk

(2010) ‘Social Security as a Public Interest: A Multidisciplinary Inquiry into the Foundations of the Regulatory Welfare State’, European Journal of Social Security, 12(1), 2–15.