In 2006 new social policy legislation was introduced in the Netherlands, under which employees with chronic health problems may be allocated a ‘double identity’, being assessed simultaneously as partly sick and partly able to work. Employees in this situation receive a proportion of disability benefit according to their assessed loss of earning capacity and are required to engage in paid work in order to earn an income over and above this. Our central research question is: Which factors elicit the labour market participation of these partially disabled employees? This article reports results from a survey of 772 partially disabled employees. We analyse our data using structural equation modelling and find that labour market participation of partially disabled employees is particularly strongly associated with perceptions of their capability to work and of their chances of returning to work. The results are considered in relation to Parsons' (1951) classical theory of the sick role and are elaborated on the basis of Sen's (1993, 1999) conceptualisation of capability.
AartsL.De JongP.Van der VeenR. (2002) Met de beste bedoelingen. WAO: 1975–1999, trends, onderzoek en beleid, 's Gravenhage: Elsevier.
2.
BuitendamA. (2001) Een open architectuur voor arbeid en organisatie. Assen, van Gorcum.
3.
BarnesH.SissonsP.StevensH. (2011) Employment and Support Allowance: Findings from a Follow-up Survey with Customers. Research Report No 745. Sheffield: Department of Work and Pensions.
ClasenJ.CleggD. (2007) ‘Levels and levers of conditionality: Measuring change within welfare states’, in ClasenJ.SiegelN. (eds.), Investigating Welfare State Change. The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 167–197.
6.
DeanH.BonvinJ.-M.VielleP.FarvaqueN. (2005) ‘Developing capabilities and rights in welfare-to work policies’, European Societies, 7(1), 3–26.
7.
De CroonE.M.SluiterJ.K.DijkmansB.A. (2004) ‘Predictive factors of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review’, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63(11), 1362–1367.
8.
DWP (2006) A New Deal for Welfare: Empowering People to Work, Cm 6730, London: Department of Work and Pensions.
9.
HallP.A. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state. The case of economic policy making in Britain’, Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.
10.
HarringtonM. (2010) An Independent Review of the Work Capability Act, Report of the WCA Independent Review Team, London: Department of Work and Pensions.
11.
HobsonB.FahlénS. (2009) Applying Sen's capabilities framework within a European context: Theoretical and empirical challenges. REC-WP03/2009', Working Papers on Reconciliation Work and Welfare in Europe, Edinburgh: RECWOWE Publication, Dissemination and Dialogue Center.
12.
HulisJ.KoppesL.TarisT.BlonkR. (2012) ‘Differences in predictors of return to work among long-term sick-listed employees with different self-reported reasons for sick leave’, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation18(1), DOI: 10.1007/s10926-011-9351-z.
13.
JöreskogK.SörbomD. (1993) Lisrel 8: Structuring equation modeling with the simplis command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
14.
NagelkerkeA.WilthagenT. (2002) ‘Towards a transnational concept of social security’, in BerghmanJ. (eds.) Social Security in Transition, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 157–170.
15.
OECD (2003) Transforming Disability into Ability. Policies to Promote Work and Income Security for Disabled People, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
16.
ParsonsT. (1951) ‘Illness and the role of the physician: A sociological perspective’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 21(3), 452–460.
17.
SchaufeliW.B.MaslachC.MarekT. (eds.) (1993) Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research, Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
18.
SenA. (1993) ‘Capability and Well-Being’, in NussbaumM.SenA. (eds.) The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 30–53.
19.
SenA. (1999), Development as Freedom, New York: Anchor Books.
20.
SmuldersP.G.W.NijhuisF.J.N. (1999) ‘The Job Demands-Job Control Model and absence behaviour: Results of a 3-year longitudinal study’, Work and Stress, 13, 115–131.
21.
SnelE.LinderF. (2008) ‘Back to work after incapacity benefit in the Netherlands’, Social Policy and Administration, 42(7), 768–788.
22.
SprengersM.TazelaarF.FlapH. (1988) ‘Social resources, situational constraints, and reemployment’, Netherlands Journal of Sociology, 24, 98–116.
23.
TarisT.W. (2002) ‘Unemployment and mental health: A longitudinal perspective’, International Journal of Stress Management, 9, 43–57.
Van RhenenW.SchaufeliW.B.Van DijkF.J.H.BlonkR. (2008) ‘Coping and sickness absence’, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 81, 461–472.
26.
VisserJ.HemerijckA. (1997) ‘A Dutch Miracle’. Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
27.
WilthagenT. (2002) ‘Managing social risks with transitional labour markets’, in MosleyH.O'ReillyJ.SchönemannK. (eds.) Labour Markets, Gender and Institutional Changes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 264–298.
