In the analysis of the usages of Europe in Portuguese reconciliation policies presented in this article, we found a general concordance/temporal sequence between EU and national level developments. In an overall context of limited policy change induced by the EU, the main actors using EU resources were political entrepreneurs: firstly, ministerial elites, and secondly, high-level officials either in government or in the independent bodies for gender equality. These actors used primarily cognitive and financial resources: the European Employment Strategy (cognitive usage), and EU funds (strategic usage), whereas legal resources were not used. Finally, cognitive usage occurred in the beginning of the reform process (the EU was reform initiator) whereas strategic usage took place to support existing goals during the reform process (the EU was reform supporter).
BacalhauM. (1993) ‘The Image, Identity and Benefits of the EC’, in LopesJ. Silva (ed.) Portugal and EC Membership Evaluated, London, Pinter.
2.
BarbosaM. (1981) ‘Women in Portugal’, Women's Studies International Quarterly, 4(4), 477–480.
3.
BERR (2008) ‘Employment Relations Research Series No. 100’, International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research, July, Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR); available at www.berr.gov.uk/files/file47247.pdf.
4.
BettioF.PlantengaJ. (2004) ‘Comparing Care Regimes in Europe’, Feminist Economics, 10(1), 85–113.
5.
CadeirasP. (2004) ‘National Report for Portugal, 4th Round’, in Govecor (ed.) Self-Coordination at the National Level: Towards a collective “gouvernement économique”? Final Report, April, Cologne.
6.
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) (1999–2008) ‘Fourth-Seventh periodic report of Portugal’.
7.
CheckelJ.T. (2005) ‘It's the Process Stupid! Process Tracing in the Study of European and International Politics’, Working Paper No. 26, ARENA Working Papers, Oslo.
8.
CousinsC. (2000) ‘Women and Employment in Southern Europe: The Implications of Recent Policy and Labour Market Directions’, South European Society and Politics, 5(1), 97–122.
FalknerG.TriebO. (2008) ‘Three worlds of compliance or four? The EU-15 compared to new member states’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 293–303.
17.
FalknerG.TriebO.HartlappM.LeiberS. (2005) Complying with Europe: EU Harmonisation and Soft Law in the Member States, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
FreireA.LoboM.C. (2006) ‘The Portuguese 2005 legislative election: Return to the left’, West European Politics, 29(3), 581–588.
20.
GonzalezM.P. (2001) Assessment of the National Action Plan for Employment 2002 from a Gender Perspective – Portugal, European Expert Group on Gender and Employment Report to the Equal Opportunities Unit, DG Employment, Brussels.
HoogheL.MarksG. (2009) ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.
23.
JacquotS.WollC. (2004) Introduction to Les usages de l'Europe, Acteurs et transformations européennes, Paris, L'Harmattan.
24.
KatrougalosG.LazaridisG. (2003) Southern European Welfare States: Problems, Challenges and Prospects, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
LarsenT.P. (2004) ‘Work and Care Strategies of European Families: Similarities or National Differences?’, Social Policy and Administration, 38(6), 654–677.
26.
LeitnerS. (2003) ‘Varieties of familialism’, European Societies, 5(4), 353–375.
27.
LewisS.HaasL. (2005) ‘Work-Life Integration and Social Policy: A Social Justice Theory and Gender Equity Approach to Work and Family’, in KossekE.LambertS.J. (eds.) Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
LoboM.C. (2003) ‘Portuguese Attitudes towards EU Membership: Social and Political Perspectives’, South European Society and Politics, 8(1), 97–118.
MossP.CorinthusM. (eds.) (2008) International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2008, Employment Relations Research Series, No. 100, available at www.berr.gov.uk/publications.
31.
NAP (1998–2005) National Action Plan for Employment – Portugal (various years).
32.
NRP (2005–2007) National Reform Programs – Portugal (various years).
33.
OECD (2006) Starting Strong II: Early childhood education and care, Paris.
34.
OECD (2004) Babies and Bosses (Vol. 3): New Zealand, Portugal and Switzerland, Paris.
35.
PeristaH. (2003) ‘Time, paid and unpaid workin Portugal – A gender issue’, Working Paper No. 4, Centre for the Study of Law and Policy in Europe, University of Leeds.
PortugalS. (1999) ‘Family and Social Policy in Portugal’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 13(3), 245–246.
38.
RuberyJ.GrimshawD.FigueiredoH.SmithM.DonellyR. (2005) ‘The National Reform Programme 2004 and the gender aspects of the European Employment Strategy. The co-ordinators' synthesis report prepared for the Equality Unit’, Final Report, Brussels, European Commission.
39.
RuberyJ.GrimshawD.SmithM.DonellyR. (2006) ‘The National Reform Programme 2005 and the gender aspects of the European Employment Strategy. The co-ordinators' synthesis report prepared for the Equality Unit’, Final Report, Brussels, European Commission.
40.
ThrelfallM. (1989) ‘Social Policy towards women in Spain, Greece and Portugal’ in GallagherT.WilliamsA.M. (eds.) Southern European Socialism: Parties, elections and the challenge of government, Manchester and New York, Manchester University Press.
41.
TorresA. (2009) ‘Women, Gender and Work: The Portuguese Case in the Context of the European Union’, International Journal of Sociology, 38(4), 36–56.
42.
WallK.LeitãoM. (2008) ‘Portugal’ in MossP.CorinthusM. (eds.) International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2008, Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR), Employment Relations Research Series, No. 100, available at www.berr.gov.uk/publications.
43.
WallK.AboimS.CunhaV.VasconcelosP. (2001) ‘Families and informal support networks in Portugal: The reproduction of inequality’, Journal of European Social Policy, 11(3), 213–233.
44.
ZartaloudisS. (2011) ‘A Compass or a Spear? The partisan usage of Europe in Portuguese Employment-Friendly Reforms’ in GrazianoP.R.JacquotS.PalierB. (eds.) The EU and the Domestic Politics of Welfare State Reforms: Europa, Europae, Basingstoke and New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
