ColeJ.A. (1987) ‘A new category of Free Exercise claims: Protection for individuals objecting to government actions that impede their religions’, 135University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1557.
2.
GolynkerO. (2009) ‘Co-ordination of Social Security Schemes in the European Union: The Rashomon effect’, 16(2), Journal of Social Security Law, 61.
3.
MarshallW. (1991) ‘In defence of Smith and Free Exercise Revisionism’, 58University of Chicago Law Review, 308.
4.
McConnellM.W. (1990) ‘Free exercise revisionism and the Smith decision’, 57University of Chicago Law Review, 1109.
5.
MowbrayA. (2007, 2nd edition) Cases and Materials on the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
6.
RyanJ.E. (1992) ‘Smith and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act: An. Iconoclastic Assessment’, 78Virginia Law Review, 1407.