Preventive policies have to be an integral part of any strategy to bring about a significant and lasting reduction in poverty. Of course, lifting people out of poverty is also essential, but this can only be a part of the plan. Preventing poverty in the first place and then preventing its recurrence must form a clear and specific part of the strategy.
This article begins by examining prevention within the anti-poverty strategies promoted by the European Commission through the objectives set out in its Reports on Social Inclusion. It also considers preventive measures presented in countries' National Action Plans on Social Inclusion and the Commission's responses to these. The second part of the article discusses why prevention has been given less priority than the Commission's specific objectives would seem to require. The paper concludes with an exploration of the issue of poverty prevention at a broader, structural level and suggests key elements for such a strategy.
Preventing poverty requires more attention to the underlying causes of poverty and the wider, structural factors that help to perpetuate it if a successful attack on the problem is to be sustained over time. This includes better linking of social and economic policy and closer attention to the ways in which widening and persistent inequalities handicap anti-poverty policies and undermine government effort – especially when they are combined with declining mobility.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchesonDonaldSir (1998), Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health, London, The Stationery Office.
2.
AlcockP. (eds.) (2001), Welfare and Wellbeing: Richard Titmuss's contribution to social policy, Bristol, The Policy Press.
3.
AtkinsonA. B.SalverdaWiemer (2005), ‘Top Incomes in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom over the 20th Century’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(4), pp. 883–913.
4.
BaldwinPeter (1999), Contagion and the State in Europe, 1830–1930, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
5.
BaratzMorton S.GrigsbyWilliam G. (1972), ‘Thoughts on Poverty and its Elimination’, Journal of Social Policy, 1(2), pp. 119–134.
Comité des Sages (1996), For a Europe of civic and social rights, Brussels, EC.
8.
EAPN (2006), The 2006–8 National Reports on Strategies for Social Protection and Social Inclusion: What do they deliver for people in poverty?, Brussels, European Anti-Poverty Network.
9.
EC (2000), Fight against poverty and social exclusion – Definition of appropriate objective, Brussels, EC, 30 November.
10.
EC (2002a), Common Outline for the 2003/2005 NAPs/Inclusion, Brussels, Social Protection Committee, EC.
11.
EC (2002b), Joint Report on Social Inclusion, Brussels, EC.
12.
EC (2003a), Employment in Europe 2003, Brussels, EC.
13.
EC (2003b), Improving quality in work: A review of recent progress, Communication from the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, EC, COM(2003) 729 final, 26 November.
EC (2004a), Joint Report on Social Inclusion, Brussels, EC, second report.
16.
EC (2004b), Report on Social Inclusion 2004: An analysis of the National Action Plans on Social Inclusion (2004–2006) submitted by the 10 new Member States, Commission Staff Working Paper.
17.
EC (2005a), Employment in Europe 2005, Brussels, EC.
18.
EC (2005b), Preventing and reducing child poverty, Community Action Programme Policy Studies Findings 1, Brussels, EC.
19.
EC (2006a), New Common Objectives from 2006, Brussels, EC.
20.
EC (2006b), Joint Opinion of the Social Protection Committee and the Economic Policy Committee, Brussels, Social Protection Committee, EC.
21.
EC (2006c), Social Inclusion in Europe 2006, Implementation and update reports, Brussels, EC.
22.
EC (2006d), Joint Report on Social Protection and Social Inclusion 2006, Brussels, EC.
23.
EC (2006e), Promoting decent work for all: The EU contribution to the implementation of the decent work agenda in the world, Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2006) 249, Brussels, EC, 24 May.
24.
EC (2006f), Employment in Europe 2006, Brussels, EC.
25.
FergeZ. (1997), ‘The changed welfare paradigm: The individualisation of the social’, Social Policy and Administration, 31(1), pp. 20–44.
26.
GallieD.PaugamS. (2002), Social Precarity and Social Integration, Brussels, EC.
27.
GansH.J. (1971), ‘The Uses of Poverty: The Poor Pay All’, Social Policy, July/August, pp. 20–24.
28.
GinnJ.StreetD.ArberS. (eds.) (2001), Women, Work and Pensions:International Issues and Prospects, Buckingham, Open University Press.
29.
GreveB. (1994), ‘The hidden welfare state: Tax expenditure and social policy’, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 3(4), pp. 203–211.
30.
GreveB. (forthcoming), Occupational Welfare – Winners and Losers, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
31.
HackerJ.S. (2002), The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
32.
HarkerL. (2006), Delivering on Child Poverty: What would it take?, London, Department for Work and Pensions.
33.
HillsJ. (2004), Inequality and the State, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
34.
HMRC (2006), ‘Tax expenditures and ready reckoners’, National Statistics, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs – www.hmrc.gov.uk/stats/taxexpenditures.
35.
HoelscherP. (2004), A thematic study using transnational comparisons to analyse and identify what combinations of policy responses are most successful in preventing and reducing high levels of child poverty, Final Report, Brussels, European Commission.
36.
HoelscherP. (2006), ‘What Works? Preventing and reducing child poverty in Europe’, European Journal of Social Security, 8(3), pp. 257–277.
37.
HughesG.SinfieldA. (2004), ‘Financing Pensions by Stealth’, in HughesG.StewartJ. (eds.), Reforming Pensions in Europe: Evolution of Pension Financing and Sources of Retirement Income, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 163–192.
38.
ILO (2001), Social Security: A new consensus, Geneva, International Labour Office.
39.
KerrC. (1954), ‘The Balkanization of Labor Markets’, in BakkeE.W. (ed.), Labor Mobility and Economic Opportunity, New York, John Wiley.
40.
KvistJ.SinfieldA. (1996), Comparing Tax Routes to Welfare in Denmark and the United Kingdom, Copenhagen, Danish National Institute of Social Research.
41.
KvistJ.SinfieldA. (1997), ‘Comparing Tax Welfare States’ in Social Policy Review9, pp. 249–275.
42.
LorentzenT. (2006), ‘Income Dynamics in Norwegian Families on Social Assistance: A panel study of a social assistance cohort’, European Journal of Social Security, 8(3), pp. 279–298.
43.
MackintoshJ. M. (1953), Trends of Opinion about the Public Health, 1901–51, London, Oxford University Press.
44.
MillerS. M. (1999), ‘Prevention of Poverty’, CROP Newsletter, Comparative Research Programme on Poverty, 6(2), May, pp. 1–2.
45.
MillsC. Wright (1959a), The Sociological Imagination, New York, Oxford University Press.
46.
MillsC. Wright (1959b), The Power Elite, New York, Galaxy.
47.
MillsC. Wright (1963), ‘The Professional Ideology of Social Pathologists’, Power, Politics and People, New York, Ballantyne, pp. 525–552.
48.
MinklerM.EstesC. (1999), Critical Gerontology: Perspectives from political and moral economy, New York, Baywood.
NobleC. (1997), Welfare as we knew it – a political history of the American welfare state, New York, Oxford University Press.
51.
O'ConnorA. (2001), Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-century U.S. History, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
52.
OECD (1994), The OECD Jobs Study, Paris, OECD.
53.
OECD (2006), OECD Employment Outlook 2006 – Boosting Jobs and Incomes, Paris, OECD.
54.
ØyenE. (2002), ‘Poverty Production: A Different Approach to Poverty Understanding’, www.crop.org/news.
55.
PhilpottJ. (2006), ‘Getting to the Core of Welfare to Work Policy’, Scottish Anti-Poverty Review, summer, pp. 13–15.
56.
SampsonA. (2004), Who Runs this Place? The Anatomy of Britain in the 21st Century, London, John Murray.
57.
SinfieldA. (2001), ‘Benefits and Research in the Labour Market’, European Journal of Social Security, 3(3), pp. 209–235.
58.
SinfieldA. (2004a), ‘Preventing Poverty: The Neglected Part of the Strategy against Child Poverty’, in House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee, Child Poverty in the UK, Second report of Session 2003–04, vol. II accessed at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmworpen/85/85we43.htm.
SinfieldA. (2006), ‘The need to strengthen preventive strategies against poverty’, Scottish Anti-Poverty Review, 3, spring, pp. 19–21.
61.
SinfieldA. (2007), ‘Tax welfare’, in PowellM. (ed.), Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, Bristol, Policy Press, pp. 129–148.
62.
St JohnS. (2006), ‘New Zealand's Financial Assistance for Poor Children: Are work incentives the answer?’, European Journal of Social Security, 8(3), pp. 299–316.
63.
TawneyR.H. (1913), ‘Poverty as an industrial problem’, reproduced in Memoranda on the Problem of Poverty, London, William Morris Press.
64.
TitmussR.M. (1958), Essays on ‘the Welfare State’, London, Allen and Unwin.
65.
TitmussR.M. (1962), Income Distribution and Social Change, London, Allen and Unwin.
66.
TitmussR.M. (1965), ‘Poverty vs. Inequality: Diagnosis’, Nation, February, pp. 130–133.
Veit-WilsonJ. (2006), ‘No Rights without Remedies: Necessary conditions for abolishing child poverty’, European Journal of Social Security, 8(3), pp. 317–337.
69.
WhitefordP.AdemaW. (2006), ‘Combating Child Poverty in OECD Countries: Is work the answer?’, European Journal of Social Security, 8(3), pp. 235–256.
