Routes to Employment for Administrators of Discretionary Payments within Social Assistance Schemes in Britain and the Netherlands

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the routes to employment taken by administrators of discretionary exceptional needs payments within social assistance in Britain and the Netherlands and questions assertions that administrators seek out their ‘occupations because of their potential as socially useful roles’ (Lipsky 1980). Empirical data illustrates that whilst Dutch administrators had often purposely embarked on a previous course of study and a subsequent career in ‘helping people’, British administrators had often come from a bureaucratic background and had, as they saw it, ‘ended up’ as Social Fund Officers, having mostly perceived the Civil Service as a means to helping themselves get a secure career. The paper concludes that, when asked to make the same kinds of decisions about (the sometimes complex exceptional needs of) social assistance beneficiaries, the two sets of workers came equipped to deal with their stressful occupations with quite different personal resources, which may be thought to impact on their understandings of poverty and the nature of social assistance dynamics.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

Asquith

(eds.) (1981), Discretion and Welfare, London: Heinemann Educational Books.

Baldwin

(1997), ‘Rules, Discretion and Legitimacy’ in Hill

(ed.) (1997), The Policy Process. A Reader, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Bradshaw

(1981), ‘From Discretion to Rules: The Experience of the Family Fund.’ in Adler

Asquith

(eds.) (1981), Discretion and Welfare, London: Heinemann Educational Books.

Clark

P.B.

Wilson

J.Q.

(1961), ‘Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organisations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 6 (2), pp. 129–166.

Dageling

Colebatch

(1997), ‘Structure and Action as Constructs in the Practice of Public Administration’ in Hill

(ed.) (1997), The Policy Process. A reader, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Elmore

(1997), ‘Organisational models of social program implementation’ in Hill

(ed.) (1997), The Policy Process. A Reader, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Esping-Andersen

(1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Esping-Andersen

(1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Feldman

(1992), ‘Social Limits to Discretion: An Organisational Perspective’ in Hawkins

(ed.) (1992), The Uses of Discretion, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

10.

Hasenfeld

(1972), ‘People Processing Organisations: An Exchange Approach’, American Sociological Review, 37 (June), pp. 256–263.

11.

Hill

(1997), The Policy Process in the Modern State, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.

12.

Howe

L.E.A.

(1985), ‘The ‘Deserving and the Undeserving’: Practises in an Urban, Local Social Security Office’, Journal of Social Policy, 14 (1), pp. 49–72.

13.

Lipsky

(1980), Street-level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

14.

Lødemel

(1997), The Welfare Paradox, Income maintenance and personal social services in Norway and Britain, 1946–1966, Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.

15.

Lødemel

Trickey

(eds.) (2001), An offer you can't Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective, Bristol: The Policy Press.

16.

Peters

B.G.

(1985), The Politics of Bureaucracy. A comparative perspective, New York: Longmans.

17.

Pollit

(1997), ‘The development of Management Thought’ in Hill

(ed.) (1997), The Policy Process. A Reader, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.

18.

Ragin

(1997), ‘Turning the Tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research’, Comparative Social Research, 16, pp. 27–42.

19.

Shragge

(ed.) (1997), Workfare. Ideology for a New Under-Class, Toronto: Garamond Press.

20.

Tullock

(1997), ‘The economic theory of bureaucracy’ in Hill

(ed.) (1997), The Policy Process. A Reader, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.

21.

Sims

Fineman

Gabriel

(1993), Organizing and Organizations. An introduction, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.

22.

Spies

Van Berkel

(2001), ‘Workfare in the Netherlands – young unemployed people and the Jobseeker's Employment Act’ in Lødemel

Trickey

(eds.) (2001), An offer you can't Refuse: Workfare in International Perspective, Bristol: The Policy Press.

23.

Van Oorschot

(2000), ‘Who should get What, and Why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public’, Policy and Politics, 28(1), pp. 33–48.