Pension Privatisation in the Baltic States: Expectations and Early Experiences

Abstract

Just after the turn of the 20^th century, the three Baltic governments acted in close sequence to partially privatise their national pension schemes – Latvia adopted this change in 2000, Estonia, in 2001, and Lithuania in 2002. These reforms may be considered a ‘second generation’ of pension privatisation in Central Europe, following similar actions by the regional leaders, Hungary (1998) and Poland (1999). This article examines the Baltic countries' early experience with privatisation, by comparing them with each other and with the Hungarian and Polish experience. In doing so, it pays particular attention to the challenges of establishing the new second pillars, to the impact of the new privately-managed individual savings schemes on the pre-existing public pay-as-you-go pension systems, and to updated projections of the effect of the reforms on future benefit adequacy. The final section situates the Baltic reforms in the context of an evolving general understanding of the economic impacts of pension privatisation, especially on aging populations, and offers recommendations for ensuring that pension levels in the Baltic states meet a basic minimum level of adequacy, as set out in the social security standards of the ILO and Council of Europe.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barr

(2004), 4th edition, The Economics of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Brown

(1996), ‘Can a Nation Save for Retirement?’, in Canadian Institute of Actuaries Bulletin, 6 (7).

Eurostat (2005), ‘Employment Outlook 2005’, in www.EUROSTAT/theme3/employment/indic_y/emp_rt, visited on 2 March 2006.

Fox

Palmer

(1999), Latvian Pension Reform, The World Bank SP Discussion Paper No. 9922, Washington D.C., The World Bank.

Fultz

Ruck

(2000), Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: An Update on the Restructuring of National Pension in Selected Countries, Budapest, ILO CEET Report No. 25.

Fultz

(ed.) (2002), Pension Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Volume 1, Restructuring with Privatization: Case studies of Hungary and Poland, Budapest, ILO CEET.

Fultz

(ed.) (2006), Pension Reform in the Baltic States, Budapest, ILO SRO.

Gill

S. I.

Packard

Yermo

(2006), Keeping the Promise of Social Security in Latin America, Washington D.C., The World Bank and Stanford CA, Stanford University Press.

Holzmann

Palacios

(2001), Individual accounts as social insurance, SP Discussion Paper No. 0114, Washington D.C., The World Bank.

10.

International Labour Organization (1995), Review of Social Protection Reform Process: Report to the (Latvian) Government, Geneva, ILO.

11.

Matits

(2006), ‘The Efficiency of the Hungarian Pension System’, February, in mimeo.

12.

Mueller

(2003), Privatizing Old Age Security: Latin American and Eastern Europe Compared, Chettenham, Glos, Edward Elgar.

13.

World Bank (1994), Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth, New York, Oxford University Press Inc.

14.

World Bank (2005), ‘Special Topic: Sustainability of the Pension System in the EU8’, Quarterly Economic Report, Washington D.C.

15.

World Bank (2006a), ‘Evaluating World Bank Support for Pension Reforms: Affordability and Coverage Remain Center Stage’, Press release, 2 February.

16.

World Bank (2006b), Pension Reform and the Development of Pension Systems: An Evaluation of World Bank Assistance (conference edition), Washington D.C., World Bank Independent Evaluation Group.