The focus of this study is to investigate whether there are links between social mobility and poverty from the viewpoint of the intergenerational transmission of poverty. The context for the study is the economic crisis of the early 1990s in Finland. The study seeks answers to questions such as whether there were changes in the intergenerational transmission of poverty during the first half of the 1990s and whether the intergenerational transmission of poverty is different among men and women. In addition, the study seeks to determine whether the intergenerational transmission of poverty is different among those coming from poor and non-poor family backgrounds in the period 1990 – 1995.
The data are derived from the 1970–1995 Longitudinal Census Data File of Statistics Finland. The panel, gathered every fifth year, is a register-based dataset, containing information on around 700 000 Finns. The 1960 birth cohort, who were 10 years old in 1970, and consequently 30 years old in 1990, was selected as the basis for the analysis.
The results of the study indicate that poverty shows clear signs of intergenerational transmission in Finland: those coming from a poor family background have around twice as high a risk of poverty in young adulthood compared to those from a non-poor family background. However, the transmission of poverty did not change during the depression: those coming from a poor family background had the same risk of poverty before and after the depression. In addition, intergenerational transmission of poverty was quite similar among men and women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AabergeR.BjörklundA.JänttiM.PalmeM.PedersenP.J.SmithN.WennemoT. (2002), ‘Income Inequality and Income Mobility in the Scandinavian Countries Compared to the United States’, Review of Income and Wealth, 48 (4), pp. 443–469.
2.
AirioINiemeläM. (2002), The Inheritance of Poverty in Finland, Paper presented in the XI Nordic Social Policy Research Meeting, Working group on ‘Marginalisation, Poverty and Social Exclusion’, 22–24.8.2002, Espoo, Finland.
3.
AtkinsonA.B.RainwaterL.SmeedingT. (1995), Income Distribution in OECD Countries, Paris: OECD.
4.
AtkinsonT.CantillonB.MarlierE.NolanB. (2002), Social Indicators. The EU and Social Inclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
BeckerG.TomesN. (1986), ‘Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families’, Journal of Labor Economics, 4 (3), pp. 1–39.
6.
BlauP.M.DuncanO.D. (1967), The American Occupational Structure, New York: Wiley.
7.
BradburyB.JenkinsS.P.MicklewrightJ. (2001), The Dynamics of Child Poverty in Industrialised Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BreenR.GoldthorpeJ.H. (2001), ‘Class, Mobility and Merit. The Experience of Two British Birth Cohorts,’European Sociological Review, 17 (2), pp. 81–101.
9.
BreenR.MoisioP. (2004), ‘Poverty Dynamics Corrected for Measurement Error’, The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2 (3), pp. 171–191.
10.
ColemanJ.S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
11.
CorcoranM.AdamsT. (1997), ‘Race, Sex, and the Intergenerational Transmission of Poverty,’ in DuncanG.J.Brooks-GunnJ. (eds.), Consequences of Growing Up Poor, New York: Russell Sage.
12.
DuncanG.J.Brooks-GunnJ. (eds.) (1997), Consequences of Growing Up Poor, New York: Russell Sage.
13.
DuncanG.J.YeungW.J.Brooks-GunnJ.SmithJ.R. (1998), ‘How Much Does Childhood Poverty Affect the Life Chances of Children?’American Sociological Review, 63, pp. 406–423.
14.
EriksonR.PöntinenS. (1985), ‘Social Mobility in Finland and Sweden: A Comparison of Men and Women,’ in AlapuroR.AlestaloM.Haavio-MannilaE.VäyrynenR. (eds.), Small States in Comparative Perspective. Essays for Erik Allardt, Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
15.
EriksonR.GoldthorpeJ.H. (1992), The Constant Flux. A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16.
Esping-AndersenG. (2002), ‘A Child-Centred Social Investment Strategy.’ in Esping-AndersenG. with GallieD.HemerijckA.MylesJ., Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Esping-AndersenG.KorpiW. (1987), ‘From Poor Relief to Institutional Welfare States: The Development of Scandinavian Social policy.’ in EriksonR.HansenE.J.RingenS.UusitaloH. (eds.), The Scandinavian Model. Welfare States and Welfare Research, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe Inc.
18.
HaatanenP. (1968), Suomen maalaisköyhälistö, Porvoo: WSOY.
19.
HillM.S.DuncanG.J. (1987), ‘Parental Family Income and the Socioeconomic Attainment of Children,’Social Science Research, 1, pp. 39–73.
20.
JencksC.PetersonP.E. (1991), The Urban Underclass, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
21.
JänttiM.RitakallioV-M. (1999), ‘Income Poverty in Finland 1971–1995’, in GustafssonB.PedersenP.J. (eds.), Poverty and Low Income in the Nordic Countries, Aldershot: Ashgate.
22.
KalelaJ.KianderJ.KivikuruU.LoikkanenH.A.SimpuraJ. (2001), Down from the Heavens, Up from the Ashes. The Finnish Economic Crisis of the 1990s in the Light of Economic and Social Research, VATT-Publications 27:6. Saarijärvi: Gummerus.
23.
KangasO.PalmeJ. (2000), ‘Does Social Policy Matter? Poverty Cycles in OECD Countries’, International Journal of Health Services, 30 (2), pp. 335–352.
24.
KangasO.RitakallioV-M. (1998), ‘Different Methods – Different Results? Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty,’ in AndressH-J. (ed.), Empirical Poverty Research in a Comparative Perspective, Aldershot: Ashgate.
25.
KaristoA. (1984), Hyvinvointi ja sairauden ongelma (Welfare and the Problem of Illness), Publications of the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, M 46, Helsinki.
26.
LewisO. (1965), La Vida, a Puerto Rican Family in the Culture of Poverty: San Juan and New York, New York: Random House.
27.
LewisO. (1969), ‘The Culture of Poverty.’ in MoynihanD.P. (ed.), On Understanding Poverty, New York: Basic Books.
28.
LipsetS.M.BendixR. (1959), Social Mobility in Industrial Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
MeadL.M. (1992), The New Politics of Poverty: The Non-Working Poor in America, New York: Basic Books.
30.
MurrayC. (1984), Losing Ground: American Social Policy 1950–80, New York: Basic Books.
31.
NiemeläM. (2005), Trends in the Relationship between Low Income and Low Expenditure in Finland 1966–2001, Working Paper Series C 16/2005, University of Turku, Department of Social Policy: Turku.
32.
OECD (2005), Babies and Bosses: Reconciling Work and Family Life. Canada, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Volume 4, OECD: Paris.
33.
PajunenA. (2005), ‘Tuloerot Suomessa vuosina 1966–2003’, Hyvinvointikatsaus 1/2005, pp. 4–10.
34.
ParikkaR. (1994), ‘Pitkä varjo – Huono-osaisuus historiallisena jatkuvuutena,’ in HeikkiläM.VähätaloK. (eds.), Huono-osaisuus ja hyvinvointivaltion muutos, Tampere: Gaudeamus.
35.
PowersD.A.XieY. (2000), Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis, Academic Press.
36.
RiiheläM.SullströmR.TuomalaM. (2002), On Economic Poverty in Finland in the 1990's, Government Institute for Economic Research. Research Reports 80, Helsinki.
37.
RingenS. (1987), The Possibility of Politics. A Study in the Political Economy of the Welfare State, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
38.
RitakallioV-M. (2002), ‘Trends of Poverty and Income Inequality in Cross-National Comparison’, European Journal of Social Security, 4 (2), pp. 151–177.
39.
SilvennoinenH. (2002), Koulutus marginalisaation hallintana, Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
40.
StenbergS-Å, (2000), ‘Inheritance of Welfare Recipiency: An Intergenerational Study of Social Assistance Recipiency in Postwar Sweden,’Journal of Marriage and Family, 62 (1), pp. 228–239.
41.
Statistics Finland (1996), The Finnish Longitudinal Census Data File, Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
42.
TitmussR.M. (1974), Social Policy. An Introduction, London: George Allen and Unwin.
43.
WilsonW.J. (1987), The Truly Disadvantaged: The inner City, the Underclass and Public Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
ÖsterbackaE. (2004), It Runs in the Family. Empirical Analyses of Family Background and Economic Status, Turku: Åbo Akademi University Press.
