This paper focuses on the ‘flexibility-security nexus' in employment and the labour market in four EU-member states: Belgium, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands. The starting point of the paper is the concept of ‘flexicurity’, viewed as a particular way of dealing with this nexus. The paper explores differences in the emphasis put on types and levels of flexibility and security, as well as the particular trade-offs between forms of flexibility and security. Co-ordinated decentralisation and flexible multi-level governance in national Industrial Relations systems seem to represent important preconditions for the introduction of flexicurity arrangements, as the Danish and Dutch cases show.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnxoD.O'ReillyJ. (2000), ‘Working-time regimes and transitions in comparative perspective’, in O'ReillyJ.CebriánI.LallementM. (eds.), Working-Time Changes, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
2.
BennerM.VadT. B. (2000), ‘Sweden and Denmark: Defending the Welfare State’, in ScharpfF.W.SchmidV.A. (eds.) Welfare and Work in the Open Economy, (Vol II). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BjörklundA. (2000), ‘Going Different Ways: Labour Market Policy in Denmark and Sweden’, in Esping-AndersenG.ReginiM. (eds.) Why Deregulate Labour Markets?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
EIRO (2001), Variable pay in Europe, European Industrial Relations Observatory, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
6.
EIRO (2002), Annual Review 2001, European Industrial Relations Observatory, Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
7.
European Commission (2001), European Governance. A white paper, Brussels.
8.
FrenchS. (2001), ‘The prospects for organised decentralisation as an institutional solution to collective bargaining decline. Evidence from the German metalworking industry’, Oslo: IIRA 6th European Congress.
9.
FuchsS.SchettkatR. (2000), ‘Germany: A Regulated Flexibility’, in Esping-AndersenG.ReginiM. (eds.) Why Deregulate Labour Markets?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
GrijpstraD.HesselinkD. Kleinde KlaverP.MiedemaE. (1999), Eerste ervaringen met de Wet Flexibiliteit en Zekerheid, Den Haag: Ministerie SZW.
11.
HasselA. (1999), ‘The erosion of industrial relations in Germany’British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37, pp. 483–505.
12.
HemerijckA.UngerB.VisserJ. (2000), ‘How Small Countries Negotiate Change’, in ScharpfF.W.SchmidV.A. (eds.), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy (Vol II), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
JørgensenH. (2002), Consensus, Co-operation and Conflict: The Policy Making Process in Denmark, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14.
KallebergA.L. (2001), ‘Organizing flexibility: The flexible firm in a new century’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39, pp. 479–504.
15.
KlammerU.TillmanK. (2001), Flexicurity – Soziale Sicherung und Flexibilisierung der Arbeits- und Lebensverhältnisse, Düsseidorf: WSI-Hans Böcklerstiftung.
16.
de KlaverP.M.HesselinkD.J. KleinMiedemaE.P. (2000), Ervaringen met en effecten van de Wet Flexibiliteit en Zekerheid. Tweede meting, Den Haag: Ministerie SZW.
17.
KlikauerT. (2002), ‘Stability in Germany's industrial relations: A critique on Hassel's erosian thesis’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40, 295–308.
18.
LéonardL. (2001), ‘Industrial relations and the regulation of employment in Europe’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 7, 27–47.
19.
MadsenP.K. (1999), Denmark: Flexibility, security and labour market success. Genève: ILO.
20.
MadsenP.K. (2002), ‘The Danish Model of Flexicurity: A Paradise – with some snakes’, in SarfatiH.BonoliG. (eds.) Labour Market and Social Protection Reforms in International Perspective, Aldershot: Ashgate.
21.
MadsenJ.S.SørensenK.DueJ. (2001), ‘From centralised decentralisation towards multi-level regulation. Danish employment relations between continuity and change’, Oslo: IRRA 6th European Congress.
22.
ManowP.SeilsE. (2000), ‘Adjusting Badly: The German Welfare State, Structural Change and the Open Economy’, in ScharpfF. W.SchmidV.A. (eds.) Welfare and Work in the Open Economy (Vol II), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
MevissenJ.W.M.KnegtR.ZwinkelsW.S. (2001), Arbeidstijden in overleg? Evaluatie van de Arbeidstijdenwet, Doetinchem: Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie.
24.
MokA.L. (2001), ‘Het poldermodel in Nederland en België’, in van den HeuvelN.HolderbekeF.WielersR.De transitionele arbeidsmarkt. Contouren van een actief arbeidsmarktbeleid, Den Haag: Elsevier.
25.
OzakiM. (ed.) (1999), Negotiating flexibility. The role of the Social Partners and the State, Geneva: International Labour Office.
26.
van PeijpeT. (1998), Employment Protection Under Strain: Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, Den Haag: Kluwer Law International.
27.
SchmidG.SchönmannK. (eds.) (1999), Von Dänemark lernen. Learning from Denmark, Berlijn: WZB Discussion Paper (FS I 99-201).
28.
SchroederW.WeinertR. (2002), ‘Third Way Politics in Germany? From a mono- to a poly-regulated structure in German employment relations’, Paper for the British Journal of Industrial Relations ‘The Politics of Employment Relations’ Conference, Cumberland Lodge, The Great Park Windsor, UK: 16–17 September 2002.
29.
SelsL.van HootegemG. (1999), ‘België-Nederland: Strijd om de meeste flexibiliteit’, in van HoofJ.MevissenJ.In banen geleid. Nieuwe vormen van sturing op de arbeidsmarkt in België en Nederland, Elsevier/SISWO.
30.
SissonK.MarginsonP, (2002), ‘Co-ordinated bargaining: A process for our times?’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40, pp. 197–220.
31.
SørensenJ.H. (2001), ‘Jobrotation – a conjunctural influenced instrument of active labour market policy – and its effects on enterprises' qualification strategies’, Paper presented at the WZB workshop Reacting in time to qualification needs. Berlijn (27–28 September).
32.
Van den TorenJ.P.EversG.H.M.CommissarisE.J. (2002), Flexibiliteit en zekerheid. Effecten en doeltreffendheid van de Wet Flexibiliteit en Zekerheid, Den Haag: min. SZW.
33.
TraxlerF. (1995), ‘Farewell to labour market associations? Organised versus disorganised decentralisation as a map for industrial relations’, in CrouchC.TraxlerF. (eds.) Organised Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future?, Aldershot: Avebury.
34.
TrosF.H. (2000), Decentralisering van arbeidsverhoudingen: Een onderzoek naar de arbeidsvoorwaardenvorming in Nederlandse private sector in de periode 1982–2000, Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.
35.
TrosF. (2002), ‘Decentraliserende arbeidsverhoudingen. De casus arbeidstijden’, in NagelkerkeA.G.WilthagenA.C.J.M. (eds.) Arbeidsverhoudingen in ontwikkeling. Deventer: Kluwer.
36.
VandenbrandeT. (2001), ‘De mobiele arbeidsmarkt. Kwantitatieve analyse van transities op de arbeidsmarkt in Europese landen’, in van den HeuvelN.HolderbekeF.WielersR.De transitionele arbeidsmarkt. Contouren van een actief arbeidsmarktbeleid, Den Haag: Elsevier.
37.
VisserJ. (2001), ‘Industrial relations and social dialogue’, in AuerP. (ed.) Changing labour markets in Europe. The role of institutions and policies, Geneva: ILO.
38.
VisserJ.van der MeerM.WilthagenT.van der HeijdenP. (forthcoming), Weg van het overleg, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
39.
WellinkA.H.E.M.CavelaarsP.A.D. (2002), ‘De ontwikkeling van de Nederlandse economie: Zijn de polderinstituties klaar voor de toekomst?’, in GradusR.KremersJ.Van SinderenJ. (eds.) Nederland Kennisland?, Kennis en innovatie: Uitdagingen voor economisch beleid, Groningen: Stenfert Kroese.
40.
WilthagenA.C.J.M. (1998), Flexicurity: A New Paradigm for Labour Market Policy Reform?, Berlin: WZB Discussion Paper.
41.
WilthagenT. (2002), ‘The Flexibility-Security Nexus: New approaches to regulating employment and labour markets’, Paper for the British Journal of Industrial Relations ‘The Politics of Employment Relations’ Conference, Cumberland Lodge, The Great Park Windsor, UK: 16–17 September 2002.
42.
WilthagenT.RogowsiR. (2002), ‘Legal Regulation of Transitional Labour Markets’ in SchmidG.GazierB. (eds.) The Dynamics of Full Employment: Social Integration through Transitional Labour Markets, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
