Abstract
Background
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is a common early complaint in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Evidence for the 21-item SCD-Questionnaire (SCD-Q21) to discriminate MCI from normal controls (NCs) is limited.
Objective
To investigate the discrimination performance of Chinese SCD-Q21 and compare it with SCD-Q9 for community-based MCI early detection, assess the added value of simple covariates, and determine an optimal SCD-Q21 cut-off.
Methods
294 NCs and 83 people with MCI were assessed and collected demographic and clinical data. Participants completed SCD-Q21, SCD-Q9, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) scale; clinical adjudication used Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic, Clinical Dementia Rating, and Activities of Daily Living. Group comparison, logistic regression and ROC analyses were applied. Optimal cut-offs were derived using the Youden index and AUCs were compared using DeLong tests. Within-MCI analyses contrasted screen-positive versus screen-negative subgroups.
Results
Total SCD-Q21 scores were higher in MCI, although five items [question 1 (Q1), Q2, Q3, Q11, and Q17] did not differ between groups. In multivariable binary logistic regression models, lower education (OR = 0.786), higher body mass index (BMI) (OR = 17.874), and higher SCD-Q21 total scores (OR = 1.114) were independently associated with MCI, whereas SCD-Q9 was not. Standalone AUCs were 0.662 (SCD-Q21) and 0.640 (SCD-Q9). Combing age, sex, education, BMI, and HAMA/HAMD with SCD instrument yielded AUC ∼0.91. SCD-Q21 ≥ 7 gave 69.88% sensitivity and 62.93% specificity. Screen-negative MCI cases showed lower vascular/metabolic comorbidity and lower HAMA/HAMD scores.
Conclusions
SCD-Q21 provides independent information but modest stand-alone discrimination. As part of a brief multivariable triage including education, BMI, vascular risk review, and anxiety rating, it supports efficient case-finding in community settings.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
