Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-4
Effects and mechanisms of a mobile-based intelligent recommender system for dementia care on the psychological health of family caregivers: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial
Health recommender systems show promise in delivering remote support and improving coping among family caregivers of persons with dementia.
Objective
To evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile-based intelligent recommender system for dementia care (DCIRS) in enhancing psychological well-being among family caregivers and to explore the mechanisms underlying its effects.
Methods
Data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) were used. Of the 250 eligible participants, 125 caregivers were randomly allocated to the intervention group (receiving DCIRS) and 125 to the waitlist control group. Outcomes, including benefit finding, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, and coping styles, were assessed at baseline (T0), 6 weeks (T1), and 12 weeks (T2). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to evaluate changes over time and between-group differences, while path analysis examined mediation pathways.
Results
At 12 weeks, the intervention group showed significant within-group improvements in coping, self-efficacy, and benefit finding (all p < 0.05 for group × time interaction). Between-group analyses revealed greater reductions in depressive symptoms at T1 and T2, though the group × time interaction was non-significant (p = 0.393). Path analysis indicated that reduced depressive symptoms were mediated primarily by increased self-efficacy.
Conclusions
This DCIRS demonstrated the potential to reduce depressive symptoms and enhance benefit finding in caregivers of people with dementia. Strengthening self-efficacy and active coping styles should remain a core focus in digital health interventions, providing meaningful guidance to healthcare professionals in developing caregiver support program.
Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health2022; 7: e105–e125.
2.
ChenMCLinHR. The experiences of family caregivers in response to a dementia diagnosis disclosure. BMC Psychiatry2022; 22: 475.
3.
PrizerLPZimmermanS. Progressive support for activities of daily living for persons living with dementia. Gerontologist2018; 58: S74–s87.
4.
FeastAOrrellMCharlesworthG, et al.Behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia and the challenges for family carers: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry2016; 208: 429–434.
5.
MessinaALattanziMAlbaneseE, et al.Caregivers of people with dementia and mental health during COVID-19: findings from a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr2022; 22: 56.
6.
MattapSMMohanDMcGrattanAM, et al.The economic burden of dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health2022; 7: e007409.
7.
SommerladAKivimäkiMLarsonEB, et al.Social participation and risk of developing dementia. Nat Aging2023; 3: 532–545.
8.
AltamiranoOWeisman de MamaniA. Risk and resiliency factors related to dementia caregiver mental health. Fam Process2021; 60: 904–919.
9.
MoonHERoteSMFolkerA, et al.Caregiver sleep quality and depression: the roles of dementia caregiving, support availability, and rural-urban contexts. Gerontologist2025; 65: gnaf120.
10.
RothDLBrownSLRhodesJD, et al.Reduced mortality rates among caregivers: does family caregiving provide a stress-buffering effect?Psychol Aging2018; 33: 619–629.
11.
VelandiaPPMiller-PetrieMKChenC, et al.Global and regional spending on dementia care from 2000-2019 and expected future health spending scenarios from 2020-2050: an economic modelling exercise. EClinicalMedicine2022; 45: 101337.
12.
ChengSTLiKKOrPPL, et al.Do caregiver interventions improve outcomes in relatives with dementia and mild cognitive impairment? A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Aging2022; 37: 929–953.
13.
LengMZhaoYXiaoH, et al.Internet-based supportive interventions for family caregivers of people with dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res2020; 22: e19468.
14.
LiangJArandaMP. The use of telehealth among people living with dementia-caregiver dyads during the COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review. J Med Internet Res2023; 25: e45045.
15.
ThaiGHRivetteSSharmanJ, et al.Dementia caregiver experiences: insights from a telephone-based support program. J Appl Gerontol2024; 43: 1241–1250.
16.
SunYLengMLuW, et al.A knowledge graph-based recommender system for dementia care: design and evaluation study. Int J Med Inform2024; 191: 105554.
17.
LengMSunYLiC, et al.Usability evaluation of a knowledge graph-based dementia care intelligent recommender system: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res2023; 25: e45788.
18.
PearlinLIMullanJTSempleSJ, et al.Caregiving and the stress process: an overview of concepts and their measures. Gerontologist1990; 30: 583–594.
19.
HaleyWELevineEGBrownSL, et al.Stress, appraisal, coping, and social support as predictors of adaptational outcome among dementia caregivers. Psychol Aging1987; 2: 323–330.
20.
KramerBJ. Gain in the caregiving experience: where are we? What next?Gerontologist1997; 37: 218–232.
21.
QuinnCTomsG. Influence of positive aspects of dementia caregiving on caregivers’ well-being: a systematic review. Gerontologist2019; 59: e584–e596.
22.
SohnMYangJSohnJ, et al.Digital healthcare for dementia and cognitive impairment: a scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud2023; 140: 104413.
23.
González-FraileEBallesterosJRuedaJR, et al.Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2021; 1: CD006440.
24.
ChengSTChanWCFungHH, et al.Self-efficacy in controlling upsetting thoughts, but not positive gains, mediates the effects of benefit-finding group intervention for Alzheimer family caregivers. Psychol Aging2022; 37: 766–775.
25.
LuchsingerJABurgioLMittelmanM, et al.Northern Manhattan Hispanic Caregiver Intervention Effectiveness Study: protocol of a pragmatic randomised trial comparing the effectiveness of two established interventions for informal caregivers of persons with dementia. BMJ Open2016; 6: e014082.
26.
XiaoH. The level of caregiver gain and the impact pathways of internal and external resources on caregiver gain among home-based dementia caregivers. Doctoral dissertation. Peking University, Beijing, China, 2012.
27.
ZhangJSchwarzerR. Measuring optimistic self-beliefs: achinese adaptation of the general self-efficacy scale. Psychologia1995; 38: 174–181.
28.
XieYN. Preliminary study on the reliability and validity of the Short Coping Style Scale. Chin J Clin Psychol1998; 6: 114–115.
29.
ZungWW. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry1965; 12: 63–70.
30.
WangMKongLLiZ, et al.Covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations (GEE) in longitudinal analysis with small samples. Stat Med2016; 35: 1706–1721.
31.
HayesAF. PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable moderation, mediation, and conditional process modeling. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf (2012).
32.
HayesAF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2017.
33.
ZhaoMNaNXingN, et al.The impact of social support on benefit finding among patients with advanced lung cancer and their caregivers: based on actor-partner interdependence mediation model. Support Care Cancer2024; 32: 287.
34.
SongYWangMZhuM, et al.Benefit finding among family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer in a palliative treatment: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs2024; 23: 397.
35.
XiaoH.Benefit finding of family caregivers of people with dementia and influence path of internal and external resources. Master’s thesis. Peking University, Beijing, China, 2022.
36.
JingBLanfengZZhunzhunL, et al.Analysis of influencing factors of disease benefit perception among family caregivers of cancer patients based on the stress-coping theory. J Nurs Train2019; 34: 2203–2207.
37.
WuJ. The current status and influencing factors of perceived benefits in caregivers of hospitalized cancer patients. Master’s thesis, 2020.
38.
AiJ. The current status and related factors analysis of benefit finding among caregivers of chronic heart failure patients. Master’s thesis, 2018.
39.
ChengSTLamLCKwokT, et al.Self-efficacy is associated with less burden and more gains from behavioral problems of Alzheimer's disease in Hong Kong Chinese caregivers. Gerontologist2013; 53: 71–80.
40.
ChenowethLStein-ParburyJWhiteD, et al.Coaching in self-efficacy improves care responses, health and well-being in dementia carers: a pre/post-test/follow-up study. BMC Health Serv Res2016; 16: 166.
41.
KassieSAAstellAJ. Reimagining neuroscientific and andragogical principles for dementia care education. Gerontol Geriatr Educ2025; 46: 232–243.
42.
ImmelDHilpertBSchwarzP, et al.Patients’ and health care professionals’ expectations of virtual therapeutic agents in outpatient aftercare: qualitative survey study. JMIR Form Res2025; 9: e59527.
43.
BlomMMBosmansJECuijpersP, et al.Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an internet intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry2013; 13: 17.
44.
HaleyWERothDLColetonMI, et al.Appraisal, coping, and social support as mediators of well-being in black and white family caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Consult Clin Psychol1996; 64: 121–129.
45.
GilhoolyKJGilhoolyMLSullivanMP, et al.A meta-review of stress, coping and interventions in dementia and dementia caregiving. BMC Geriatr2016; 16: 106.
46.
PossinKLMerrileesJJDulaneyS, et al.Effect of collaborative dementia care via telephone and internet on quality of life, caregiver well-being, and health care use: the care ecosystem randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med2019; 179: 1658–1667.
47.
BanduraA. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol1982; 37: 122–147.
48.
TuJYJinGChenJH, et al.Caregiver burden and dementia: a systematic review of self-report instruments. J Alzheimers Dis2022; 86: 1527–1543.
