In the last 20 years, cognitive-behavioral units (CBUs) have been opened in various countries to provide care for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias who experience severe behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD).
Objective
This study examines the perspectives of relatives and healthcare professionals caring for patients in three CBUs in France and highlights key issues in clinical ethics.
Methods
Using the commitment model (a qualitative methodology in clinical ethics), we conducted 154 semi-structured interviews between March 2019 and March 2020, which were subsequently analyzed thematically. The study focused on three CBUs: one in a public hospital and another in a private hospital in the Paris region, and one in a public hospital in the Hauts-de-France region. We interviewed 62 individuals, including 25 relatives and 37 healthcare professionals. Some of the professionals were interviewed several times about their experience with the 30 patients included in the study (18 men and 12 women, average age 79 years).
Results
Three key themes emerged from the interviews: 1) general appreciation for the relational approach adopted in the CBUs, 2) concerns regarding the limitations of care, and 3) distress regarding restrictions to patients’ personal freedom.
Conclusions
CBUs are a promising and welcome initiatives but would benefit from a reconsideration of cultural approaches to care for older people with BPSD. End-of-life care, interprofessional collaboration and respect for autonomy need to be more thoroughly discussed. In doing so, CBUs could act as catalysts for public debate on the accommodation of people with BPSD.
ColomboMVitaliSCairatiM, et al.Behavioral and psychotic symptoms of dementia (BPSD) improvements in a special care unit: a factor analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr2007; 44: 113–120.
2.
LövheimHSandmanP-OKarlssonS, et al.Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia in relation to level of cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr2008; 20: 777–789.
3.
PoptsiETsolakiMBerghS, et al.Rationale, design, and methodology of a prospective cohort study for coping with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. The RECage Project. J Alzheimers Dis2021; 80: 1613–1627.
KersaléMVazSClerayM. Therapeutic cooking activity adapted to finger-foods in a specialized psychogeriatric unit. NPG Neurol Psychiatr Gériatr2019; 19: 300–306.
7.
BailleulMBailleulMG. The ethics of care in a Cognitive-Behavioral Unit: from ‘‘proofs of care’’ to ‘‘tools for care’’. NPG Neurolog Psychiatr Gériatr2021; 21: 118–125.
8.
KoskasPBelqadiSMazouziS, et al.Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia in a pilot psychogeriatric unit: management and outcomes. Rev Neurol (Paris)2011; 167: 254–259.
9.
Delphin-CombeFRoubeaudCMartin-GaujardG, et al.Effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral unit on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Rev Neurol (Paris)2013; 169: 490–494.
10.
SaidlitzPSourdetSVellasB, et al.Management of behavioral symptoms in dementia in a specialized unit care. Gériatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil2014; 12: 371–378.
11.
LaiCKYeungJHMokV, et al.Special care units for dementia individuals with behavioural problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2009; 7: CD006470.
12.
LauridsenSSchou-JuulFFolkerAP, et al.Developing the CARE intervention to enhance ethical self-efficacy in dementia care through the use of literary texts. BMC Med Ethics2021; 24: 45.
13.
FlorackJAbeleCBaischS, et al.Project DECIDE, part II: decision-making places for people with dementia in Alzheimer’s disease: supporting advance decision-making by improving person-environment fit. BMC Med Ethics2023; 24: 26.
14.
PoppeCElgerBSWangmoT, et al.Evaluation of decision-making capacity in patients with dementia: challenges and recommendations from a secondary analysis of qualitative interviews. BMC Med Ethics2020; 21: 55.
15.
SanchiniVSalaRGastmansC. The concept of vulnerability in aged care: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. BMC Med Ethics2022; 23: 84.
16.
FournierV. Clinical ethics: methods. In: Ten HaveH (eds) Encyclopedia of global bioethics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015, pp.1–10.
17.
FournierVBeretonnièreSSpranziM. Empirical research in clinical ethics: the ‘committed researcher’ approach. Bioethics2020; 34: 719–726.
18.
MuranoMCMaglioMFoureurN, et al.The ‘commitment model’ of clinical ethics consultation: revisiting the meaning of expertise and professionalization. J Clin Ethics2021; 32: 287–297.
19.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
20.
JonsenARToulminS. The abuse of casuistry: a history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
21.
ClarkeVBraunV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3: 77–101.
22.
ScalesKZimmermanSMillerSJ. Evidence-based nonpharmacological practices to address behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Gerontologist2018; 58: S88–S102.
23.
PaulFAGanieAURDarDR, et al.Exploring psychiatric patient restraints: balancing safety, ethics, and patient rights in mental healthcare. Asian J Psychiatr2024; 96: 104051.
24.
MalboisEFoureurN. La contention nocturne en gériatrie, faut-il toujours l’éviterComment, au contraire, se poser la question au cas par cas. Bioethica Forum2019; 12: 105–109.
25.
Mendonça LimaCABanerjeeDAyalonL, et al.IPA And WPA-SOAP position statement on deprivation of liberty of older persons with mental health conditions. Int Psychogeriatr2022; 34: 949–952.
26.
DoddsS. Exercising restraint: autonomy, welfare and elderly patients. J Med Ethics1996; 22: 160–163.
27.
HamersJPHHuizingAR. Why do we use physical restraints in the elderly?Z Gerontol Geriatr2005; 38: 19–25.
28.
GjerbegELillemoenLPedersenR, et al.Coercion in nursing homes: perspectives of patients and relatives. Nurs Ethics2016; 23: 253–264.
29.
GailleM. En soutie à la vie. Éthique du care et médecine. Paris: Vrin, 2022.
30.
EsquerdaM. Hablar de la muerte para vivir y morir mejor. Cómo evitar dolor y sufrimiento añadido al final de la vida. Barcelona: Alienta, 2022.
31.
HirotF. Palliative care for dementia patients. Gériatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil2016; 14: 447–453.
32.
SellarsMChungONolteL, et al.Perspectives of people with dementia and carers on advance care planning and end-of-life care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Palliat Med2019; 33: 274–290.
33.
McClearyLThompsonGNVenturatoL, et al.Meaningful connections in dementia end of life care in long term care homes. BMC Psychiatry2018; 18: 307.
34.
EisenmannYGollaHSchmidtH, et al.Palliative care in advanced dementia. Front Psychiatry2020; 11: 699.
35.
MoonFMcDermottFKissaneD. Systematic review for the quality of end-of-life care for patients with dementia in the hospital setting. Am J Hosp Palliat Care2018; 35: 1572–1583.
36.
KupeliNLeaveyGMooreK, et al.Context, mechanisms and outcomes in end of life care for people with advanced dementia. BMC Palliat Care2016; 15: 31.
37.
LazzariCKoteraYGreenP, et al.Social network analysis of Alzheimer's teams: a clinical review and applications in psychiatry to explore interprofessional care. Curr Alzheimer Res2021; 18: 380–398.
38.
SourdeauAJacquesDZdanowiczN. Difficulties in combining somatic and psychiatric care in psychogeriatry. Psychiatr Danub2023; 35: 225–229.
39.
SandvollAMBjordalTHollekveI, et al.Tailor-made services: cooperation and supervision are essential for older people with dementia and challenging behaviour. Scand Psychol2019; 6: e4.
40.
BrudneyDLantosJ. Agency and authenticity: which value grounds patient choice?Theor Med Bioeth2011; 32: 217–227.
41.
TheurerKBen MortensonWStoneR, et al.The need for a social revolution in residential care. J Aging Stud2015; 35: 201–210.
42.
DescartesR. Meditations on first philosophy: With selections from the objections and replies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
43.
LederD. A tale of two bodies. The Cartesian corpse and the lived body. In: LederD (eds) The body in medical thought and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992, pp.17–35.
44.
SlatmanJWiddershovenG. An ethics of embodiment: the body as object and subject. In: MachamD (eds) Medicine and society, new perspectives in continental philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015, pp.87–104.
45.
Merleau-PontyM. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge, 2014.
46.
MackenzieCStoljarN. Relational Autonomy. Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
47.
Gómez-VírsedaCde MaeseneerYGastmansC. Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real life complexities. BMC Med Ethics2020; 21: 50.
48.
BowersB. Guest editorial: culture change – challenges, opportunities and questions. Int J Older People Nurs2011; 6: 3.
