Abstract
Background
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease affecting millions globally, with particular severity in low- and middle-income countries due to barriers in timely diagnosis and treatment. To date, two monoclonal anti-amyloids have shown positive results in phase III clinical trials. However, their administration is complex, requiring specialized infrastructure, highly trained professionals, and regular follow-ups, posing major challenges for healthcare systems.
Objective
This study explores Peruvian neurologists’ perceptions of changes needed to implement monoclonal antibodies in line with clinical guidelines.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted in Peru using the key informant (KI) methodology. KI were neurologists from multiple regions across the country. A comprehensive list of tertiary-level hospitals (public healthcare system, social security, and police and armed forces) was compiled, and at least one neurologist from each institution was contacted. The instrument used was adapted from a study conducted in Spain, which included questions focusing on changes in diagnosis, patient care, diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, public and family impact, neurology resources, and dementia research. Data analysis was employed using Stata18, using descriptive statistics and frequency distributions.
Results
Twenty-eight neurologists completed the survey. There was consensus on the significant impact monoclonal antibodies would have on neurology services. Over 85% agreed that more neurologists and nurses would be needed. Additionally, 93% supported using brief diagnostic scales in primary care and increasing follow-up visit frequency.
Conclusions
The introduction of monoclonal antibodies for AD in Peru requires modifications to healthcare institutions, highlighting the urgent need for strategic healthcare planning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
