Abstract
Background
Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients experience elevated mortality during emergency department (ED) encounters, yet the associated risk factors remain insufficiently characterized.
Objective
To identify predictors of mortality among older adults with AD during ED visits and examine differences in comorbidity patterns between those who died and those who survived.
Methods
We analyzed 20,532,351 ED visits for adults aged ≥60 from the 2012–2014 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Visits were stratified by AD status, ZIP-code income quartile, and mortality outcome (defined as in-ED or in-hospital death following ED presentation). We used logistic regression and machine learning models (random forest, gradient boosting, XGBoost) to predict mortality in a 1:1 matched case-control dataset. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were applied to interpret model outputs.
Results
AD patients accounted for 1.76–2.13% of all ED visits, with mortality rates of 2.55–2.68% compared to 1.10–1.76% for non-AD patients. Socioeconomic status and ED charges were not associated with increased mortality. Odds ratio analysis identified rare terminal events as top predictors (e.g., respiratory arrest, OR = 55.5), while SHAP analysis highlighted more prevalent and clinically actionable conditions such as acute respiratory failure and septicemia as major drivers of mortality. All models performed comparably (AUC ≈ 0.85).
Conclusions
AD patients face significantly higher mortality during ED encounters. Integrating explainable machine learning with large-scale administrative data may help flag lethal comorbidities in real time and improve outcomes through better ED triage and care prioritization.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
