Abstract
Background
Research suggests that Lewy body dementia (LBD) is underdiagnosed, but reasons for this are under-studied.
Objective
To investigate the frequency of diagnosis codes aligned with LBD symptoms in Medicare beneficiaries.
Methods
The frequency of ICD-10 codes associated with dementia and core and supportive LBD features was assessed in a 15% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries (2017–2020). The frequency of diagnosis codes was assessed in the full cohort and a cohort with an LBD diagnosis code, overall and stratified by ethnoracial group. Differences between groups were assessed using chi-square and Mantel-Haenszel chi-square tests.
Results
The study included 4,261,782 Medicare beneficiaries, 22,092 (0.5%) with an ICD-10 code for LBD. Diagnosis codes for REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) were infrequent, whereas parkinsonism, hallucinations, and new onset schizophrenia were diagnosed more frequently than LBD. Of the total cohort, 1.6% of beneficiaries had a non-LBD dementia code plus at least one core LBD feature. LBD was least commonly diagnosed in Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaskan Native cohorts. RBD and parkinsonism were also less frequently coded in these groups. Hallucinations were more frequently coded in Black and American Indian/Alaskan Native beneficiaries and they had the highest frequency of very late onset schizophrenia diagnoses.
Conclusions
These findings suggest LBD is likely underdiagnosed overall and in certain ethnoracial groups. Identifying RBD and parkinsonism and recognizing new-onset hallucinations as an LBD feature could improve diagnosis. Further research is needed to investigate reasons for LBD under-diagnosis and to identify strategies to improve LBD diagnosis across all groups.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
