Abstract
Background
Lecanemab reduces amyloid levels and modestly slows cognitive decline in a large cohort of early Alzheimer's disease (AD) but lacks real-world safety data in Chinese population.
Objective
The real-world study aims to analyze baseline characteristics and preliminary safety of lecanemab for AD in Zhejiang Province, and to evaluate the efficacy of plasma biomarkers for patient screening.
Methods
This multi-center study included 190 patients with AD in Zhejiang Province, who completed baseline assessments and received lecanemab treatment with follow-up.
Results
The study included 176 participants with early AD and 14 moderate. In the early AD (mean age 68.04 years, Mini-Mental State Examination 20.03 and Montreal Cognitive Assessment 14.93), 124 (70.5%) participants were female, and 127 (72.1%) were junior high school education level or less. APOE4 heterozygote was predominant (48.9%). Logistic regression for distinguishing early AD from the Aβ negative cognitively unimpaired populations showed that p-Tau 217 independently provided better classification efficacy (area under the curve = 0.9983, p < 0.0001). In the early AD, 29 (16.5%) participants experienced infusion-related reactions (IRR) after the first-dose lecanemab, and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) were identified in 17 patients (9.7%), while 3 (21.4%) with IRR and none ARIA observed in the moderate AD.
Conclusions
The real-world lecanemab cohort had more females, lower educational level, and higher disease burden compared with the clinical trial cohort. Overall lecanemab exhibited a manageable short-term safety profile with no measurable cognitive efficacy. Extensive monitoring and management are required for ARIA of clinically importance. The plasma p-Tau 217 showed high accuracy for early AD screening.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
