Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online 2026-2
Effects of virtual reality-based therapy on cognitive and psychological outcomes in older adults with predementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Predementia, encompassing subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), represents an early phase of neurodegeneration with a heightened risk of progression to dementia. This stage offers a critical window for intervention. Virtual reality (VR) enhances neuroplasticity in predementia via multisensory stimulation, addressing research gaps.
Objective
To assess the impact of VR-based interventions on cognitive abilities, emotional well-being, and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in individuals with predementia conditions.
Methods
A search of seven databases identified studies involving seniors aged ≥65 with SCD or MCI. Eligible studies compared conventional cognitive training or usual care as controls. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and evidence certainty was graded using the GRADE framework.
Results
Twelve randomized controlled trials were included. The meta-analysis revealed that, in comparison to control groups, VR-based cognitive interventions had superior effects on subjective cognitive complaints (SMD = −4.06, 95% CI [−4.86, −3.25]), learning and memory (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI [0.02, 0.80]), working memory (SMD = −0.06, 95% CI [−0.08, −0.03]), verbal fluency (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI [0.03, 0.94]), spatial cognition (SMD = 1.43, 95% CI [0.77, 2.10]), and IADL (SMD = 0.77, 95% CI [0.14, 1.40]).
Conclusions
VR-based cognitive interventions could improve objective cognitive performance, subjective cognitive complaints, and IADL in predementia. Future research should prioritize optimizing the intervention protocols and enhancing the geriatric-specific VR-based cognitive intervention.
GBD 2019 Dementia Forecasting Collaborators. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Public Health2022; 7: e105–e125.
2.
WieseLKLinglerJLindauerA. Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia: discerning the differences: assessment is key for optimal management. Am Nurse J2021; 16: 10–17.
3.
WeilRSLashleyTLBrasJ, et al.Current concepts and controversies in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies. F1000Res2017; 6: 2132–2141.
4.
KhazaeeAEbrahimzadehABabajani-FeremiA. Identifying patients with Alzheimer's disease using resting-state fMRI and graph theory. Clin Neurophysiol2015; 126: 2132–2141.
5.
SnitzBEWangTCloonanYK, et al.Risk of progression from subjective cognitive decline to mild cognitive impairment: the role of study setting. Alzheimers Dement2018; 14: 734–742.
6.
MorozovaAZorkinaYAbramovaO, et al.Neurobiological highlights of cognitive impairment in psychiatric disorders. Int J Mol Sci2022; 23: 1217.
7.
OdawaraT. Cautious notification and continual monitoring of patients with mild cognitive impairment. Psychogeriatrics2012; 12: 131–132.
8.
LivingstonGSommerladAOrgetaV, et al.Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet2017; 390: 2673–2734.
9.
LiewTM. Trajectories of subjective cognitive decline, and the risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Alzheimers Res Ther2020; 12: 135.
10.
SharmaVSharmaPCYadavV, et al.Impact of GSK-3β and CK-1δ on Wnt signaling pathway in Alzheimer disease: a dual target approach. Bioorg Chem2024; 147: 107378.
11.
Toledano-DíazAÁlvarezMIToledanoA. The relationships between neuroglial and neuronal changes in Alzheimer's disease, and the related controversies II: gliotherapies and multimodal therapy. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis2022; 14: 11795735221123896.
12.
Bahar-FuchsAMartyrAGohAM, et al.Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2019; 3: CD013069.
13.
SimonSSYokomizoJEBottinoCM. Cognitive intervention in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2012; 36: 1163–1178.
14.
O'NeilOFernandezMMHerzogJ, et al.Virtual reality for neurorehabilitation: insights from 3 European clinics. PM R2018; 10: S198–s206.
15.
WankhedeNLKoppulaSBallalS, et al.Virtual reality modulating dynamics of neuroplasticity: innovations in neuro-motor rehabilitation. Neuroscience2025; 566: 97–111.
16.
Carbajal GalarzaMChinchihualpa ParedesNOAbanto PerezSA, et al.Effectiveness of technology-based stroke interventions to improve upper limb functioning in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil2025; 32: 723–743.
17.
van der KolkNMde VriesNMKesselsRPC, et al.Effectiveness of home-based and remotely supervised aerobic exercise in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol2019; 18: 998–1008.
18.
WinterCKernFGallD, et al.Immersive virtual reality during gait rehabilitation increases walking speed and motivation: a usability evaluation with healthy participants and patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil2021; 18: 68.
19.
VoinescuASuiJStanton FraserD. Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. J Clin Med2021; 10: 1478.
20.
CataniaVRundoFPaneraiS, et al.Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of acquired cognitive disorders: a narrative review. Bioengineering (Basel)2023; 11: 35.
21.
NapetschnigABrixiusKDeitersW. Development of a core set of quality criteria for virtual reality applications designed for older adults: multistep qualitative study. Interact J Med Res2023; 12: e45433.
22.
NaqviWMNaqviIMishraGV, et al.The dual importance of virtual reality usability in rehabilitation: a focus on therapists and patients. Cureus2024; 16: e56724.
23.
MaggioMGBenenatiAImpellizzeriF, et al.Impact of cognitive VR vs. traditional training on emotional self-efficacy and cognitive function in patients with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study focusing on gender differences. Brain Sci2024; 14: 1227.
24.
SeongSKimHChoY, et al.Impact of virtual reality-based biofeedback on sleep quality among individuals with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, or both: 4-week randomized controlled study. J Med Internet Res2025; 27: e65772.
25.
OlazaránJMuñizRReisbergB, et al.Benefits of cognitive-motor intervention in MCI and mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Neurology2004; 63: 2348–2353.
26.
LiaoYYTsengHYLinYJ, et al.Using virtual reality-based training to improve cognitive function, instrumental activities of daily living and neural efficiency in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med2020; 56: 47–57.
27.
KangJMKimNLeeSY, et al.Effect of cognitive training in fully immersive virtual reality on visuospatial function and frontal-occipital functional connectivity in predementia: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res2021; 23: e24526.
28.
ParkJH. Effects of virtual reality-based spatial cognitive training on hippocampal function of older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr2022; 34: 157–163.
29.
TorpilBŞahinSPekçetinS, et al.The effectiveness of a virtual reality-based intervention on cognitive functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. Games Health J2021; 10: 109–114.
30.
LiuZHeZYuanJ, et al.Application of immersive virtual-reality-based puzzle games in elderly patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment: a pilot study. Brain Sci2022; 13: 79.
31.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: n71.
32.
ChandlerJCumpstonMLiT. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2019.
33.
SterneJACSavovićJPageMJ, et al.Rob 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J2019; 366: l4898.
34.
HalimIStemmetLHachS, et al.Individualized virtual reality for increasing self-compassion: evaluation study. JMIR Ment Health2023; 10: e47617.
35.
Rubio-AparicioMMarín-MartínezFSánchez-MecaJ, et al.A methodological review of meta-analyses of the effectiveness of clinical psychology treatments. Behav Res Methods2018; 50: 2057–2073.
36.
GuyattGHOxmanADVistGE, et al.GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J2008; 336: 924–926.
37.
GranholmAAlhazzaniWMøllerMH. Use of the GRADE approach in systematic reviews and guidelines. Br J Anaesth2019; 123: 554–559.
38.
Evidence Prime. Streamline Evidence-Based Guidelines with GRADEpro, https://www.gradepro.org/ (2025, accessed 16 Mar 2025).
AlloreHGTripodisYInouyeSK. Introducing the guide to statistics and methods: a new series for JAMA internal medicine. JAMA Intern Med2023; 183: 1289–1290.
41.
SasaninezhadMMoradiAFarahimaneshS, et al.Enhancing cognitive flexibility and working memory in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: exploring the impact of virtual reality on daily life activities. Geriatr Nurs2024; 56: 32–39.
42.
KwanRYCLiuJSinOSK, et al.Effects of virtual reality motor-cognitive training for older people with cognitive frailty: multicentered randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res2024; 26: e57809.
43.
ParkJH. Does the virtual shopping training improve executive function and instrumental activities of daily living of patients with mild cognitive impairment?Asian J Psychiatr2022; 69: 102977.
44.
BollerBOuelletÉBellevilleS. Using virtual reality to assess and promote transfer of memory training in older adults with memory complaints: a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol2021; 12: 627242.
45.
ThapaNParkHJYangJG, et al.The effect of a virtual reality-based intervention program on cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized control trial. J Clin Med2020; 9: 1283.
46.
ParkJHLiaoYKimDR, et al.Feasibility and tolerability of a culture-based virtual reality (VR) training program in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 3030.
47.
SunZWangTGuX, et al.Virtual reality training can effectively improve the cognitive functioning and functional fitness of persons with subjective cognitive decline. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil2023; 45: 320–325.
48.
YangHLChuHKaoCC, et al.Development and effectiveness of virtual interactive working memory training for older people with mild cognitive impairment: a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing2019; 48: 519–525.
49.
BueleJAvilés-CastilloFDel-Valle-SotoC, et al.Effects of a dual intervention (motor and virtual reality-based cognitive) on cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil2024; 21: 130.
BullJL.Experiences of Adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Relationship to Executive Function Deficits. PhD Thesis, University of Staffordshire, UK, 2014.
53.
IjazKAhmadpourNNaismithSL, et al.An immersive virtual reality platform for assessing spatial navigation memory in predementia screening: feasibility and usability study. JMIR Ment Health2019; 6: e13887.
54.
FariaALAndradeASoaresL, et al.Benefits of virtual reality based cognitive rehabilitation through simulated activities of daily living: a randomized controlled trial with stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil2016; 13: 96.
55.
TortoraCDi CrostaALa MalvaP, et al.Virtual reality and cognitive rehabilitation for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev2024; 93: 102146.
56.
MatsangidouMSolomouTFrangoudesF, et al.Affective out-world experience via virtual reality for older adults living with mild cognitive impairments or mild dementia. Int J Environ Res Public Health2023; 20: 2919.
57.
BrimelowREThangaveluKBeattieR, et al.Feasibility of group-based multiple virtual reality sessions to reduce behavioral and psychological symptoms in persons living in residential aged care. J Am Med Dir Assoc2022; 23: 831–837.e832.
58.
JeongEHamYLeeSJ, et al.Virtual reality-based music attention training for acquired brain injury: a randomized crossover study. Ann N Y Acad Sci2024; 1541: 151–162.
59.
LampitAHallockHValenzuelaM. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med2014; 11: e1001756.
60.
MontanaJIMatamala-GomezMMaistoM, et al.The benefits of emotion regulation interventions in virtual reality for the improvement of wellbeing in adults and older adults: a systematic review. J Clin Med2020; 9: 500.
61.
MuCGDangXLLuoXJ. Mendelian randomization analyses reveal causal relationships between brain functional networks and risk of psychiatric disorders. Nat Hum Behav2024; 8: 1417–1428.
62.
OudegaMLWagenmakersMJPalsmaT, et al.Brainfit: improving executive and subjective cognitive functioning in late-life mood disorders - a double-blind randomized active-controlled study evaluating the effect of online cognitive training. Front Psychiatry2024; 15: 1509821.
63.
IamsakulKPavlovcikAVCalderonJI, et al.PROJECT HEAVEN: preoperative training in virtual reality. Surg Neurol Int2017; 8: 59.
64.
AriasPRobles-GarcíaVSanmartínG, et al.Virtual reality as a tool for evaluation of repetitive rhythmic movements in the elderly and Parkinson's disease patients. PLoS One2012; 7: e30021.
65.
GoyalCVardhanVNaqviW. Virtual reality-based intervention for enhancing upper extremity function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a literature review. Cureus2022; 14: e21693.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
