Abstract
Background
Participant attrition can compromise the statistical power and generalizability of research results. Prior investigations have shown that perceptions of higher research burden are positively associated with participant withdrawal from longitudinal studies.
Objective
We measured participants’ perceived burden in a cohort of older adult research participants enrolled in a longitudinal study of memory and aging at the Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (MADRC).
Methods
Participants completed a modified, 22-item version of the Perceived Research Burden Assessment (PeRBA), which quantitatively measures perceptions of research burden. We performed a multiple linear regression analysis to ascertain the associations between individual participant characteristics (e.g., demographic, clinical, and logistical/socioecological factors) and ratings of perceived research burden.
Results
A total of 300 participants completed the PeRBA. Overall burden was relatively low (mean = 36.6, SD = 9.38), with possible scores ranging from 22–110. Participants who self-identified as Black/African American reported significantly higher levels of perceived research burden relative to participants who self-identified as non-Hispanic White (β = 6.91, p < 0.001). Additionally, participants with a dementia diagnosis endorsed significantly higher levels of burden than their cognitively unimpaired counterparts (β = 4.85, p = 0.03)
Conclusions
The PeRBA is a useful tool for monitoring participant burden, as well as identifying differential levels of self-reported burden within research cohorts. These findings can inform tailored retention strategies that support the sustained engagement of participants, particularly those who may be the most susceptible to research burden.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
