Abstract
Background
The shift toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has led to increased use of biomarkers (e.g., amyloid, tau, APOE genotype) in research settings. As return of biomarker results becomes more common in AD research, understanding how participants perceive and make decisions about receiving individual research results is essential for ethical trial design and informed consent practices.
Objective
(1) To map and appraise the landscape of qualitative and mixed-methods research focused on perspectives of AD research community members related to biomarker result sharing in AD research settings; and (2) to synthesize findings on decisional needs of research participants considering whether to receive individual biomarker or genetic risk information.
Methods
We searched PubMed and EMBASE for qualitative and mixed-methods studies published between January 2012 and January 2025. Eligibility criteria included empirical studies reporting qualitative data on experiences, attitudes, or decision-making processes related to receiving AD biomarker or genetic results in research contexts.
Results
Of 3269 records screened, 42 records were assessed for eligibility and 8 met inclusion criteria and were included in our final analysis. Participants emphasized empowerment through research participation and desire for knowledge related to research results. Across studies, decisional needs, characterized as “aspects of decision-making” clustered around four domains: (1) clarity of biomarker meaning and limitations, (2) emotional readiness and support, (3) social consequences of disclosure, and (4) alignment with personal values and future planning.
Conclusions
Findings can inform the development of ethically grounded protocols for returning individual research results in preclinical AD trials.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
