Abstract
Background
Subjective memory complaints are potential early indicators of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but their diagnostic utility is limited by high prevalence in cognitively normal older adults. The original Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire (SMCQ) shows suboptimal specificity and assigns equal weight to all items.
Objective
To develop and validate a revised SMCQ (SMCQ-R) with improved diagnostic accuracy through systematic item selection and empirical weighting.
Methods
Using a development dataset (252 AD patients, 252 age/sex-matched controls), we: 1) excluded items endorsed by >33% of controls, 2) applied Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression for item selection, and 3) derived integer weights from regression coefficients. Diagnostic performance was compared between SMCQ-R and original SMCQ using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Hierarchical regression assessed incremental value with the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE).
Results
The 9-item SMCQ-R (score range: 0–30) showed higher AUC than the original SMCQ in the development dataset (0.868 versus 0.811, p < 0.001) and maintained comparable performance in an independent validation dataset. In the validation dataset, SMCQ-R showed modest but significant gains in specificity (0.850 versus 0.813, p = 0.031) and accuracy (0.816 versus 0.789, p = 0.061) with comparable area under the curve (AUC) and sensitivity. Combining SMCQ-R with MMSE improved classification accuracy to 89.5%, compared with 86.0% for MMSE alone.
Conclusions
The SMCQ-R refines subjective memory assessment through evidence-based refinement and provides incremental diagnostic value for early symptomatic AD screening.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
