The Digits-in-Noise (DIN) test is recognized as a promising hearing screening tool due to its feasibility and reliability, particularly in noisy environments. Although endorsed by the World Health Organization for general population hearing screening, it has not been validated in older adults with cognitive impairment, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia, including Alzheimer's disease.
Objective
To address this gap, this study aimed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of DIN compared to pure-tone audiometry, marking the first validation of the DIN test in this specific group.
Methods
Participants with MCI and dementia were recruited from memory clinics. Each participant underwent an audiologic evaluation, including the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly, pure-tone audiometry, and smartphone-based DIN test. Additionally, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, was administered.
Results
Among 93 adults (mean age 71.9), an optimal speech reception threshold (SRT) cutoff of −3.5 dB yielded 90.5% sensitivity and 50% specificity for detecting moderate hearing loss. The area under the curve was 0.649 for mild hearing loss and 0.746 for moderate. A significant weak positive correlation was observed between SRT and pure tone average (ρ= 0.35, p < 0.001)
Conclusion
Our findings underscore the potential of the DIN test in detecting disabling hearing loss among cognitively impaired individuals, which warrants immediate hearing intervention to improve their quality of life.
ChadhaSKamenovKCiezaA. The world report on hearing, 2021. Bull World Health Organ2021; 99: 242–242a.
2.
LivingstonGHuntleyJSommerladA, et al.Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the lancet commission. Lancet2020; 396: 413–446.
3.
GoldMLightfootLAHnath-ChisolmT. Hearing loss in a memory disorders clinic. A specially vulnerable population. Arch Neurol1996; 53: 922–928.
4.
LivingstonGHuntleyJLiuKY, et al.Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the lancet standing commission. Lancet2024; 404: 572–628.
5.
CanevelliMGrandeGLacorteE, et al.Spontaneous reversion of mild cognitive impairment to normal cognition: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc2016; 17: 943–948.
6.
ChenYQianXZhangY, et al.Prediction models for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci2022; 14: 840386.
7.
Tábuas-PereiraMBaldeirasIDuroD, et al.Prognosis of early-onset vs. late-onset mild cognitive impairment: comparison of conversion rates and its predictors. Geriatrics (Basel)2016; 1: 11.
8.
McClannahanKSChiuYFSommersMS, et al.Test-retest reliability of audiometric assessment in individuals with mild dementia. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2021; 147: 442–449.
9.
LeeSJLeeS. Clinical utility of response time in speech audiometry in elderly with mild cognitive impairment. Int J Audiol2023; 62: 418–423.
10.
YeoBSYSongHTohEMS, et al.Association of hearing aids and cochlear implants with cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol2023; 80: 134–141.
11.
LinFRPikeJRAlbertMS, et al.Hearing intervention versus health education control to reduce cognitive decline in older adults with hearing loss in the USA (ACHIEVE): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet2023; 402: 786–797.
12.
IshakEBurgEAPikeJR, et al.Population attributable fraction of incident dementia associated with hearing loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2025; 151: 568–575.
13.
BottAMeyerCHicksonL, et al.Can adults living with dementia complete pure-tone audiometry? A systematic review. Int J Audiol2019; 58: 185–192.
14.
SmitsCTheo GovertsSFestenJM. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise. J Acoust Soc Am2013; 133: 1693–1706.
15.
Van den BorreEDenysSvan WieringenA, et al.The digit triplet test: a scoping review. Int J Audiol2021; 60: 946–963.
16.
KwakCSeoJ-HOhY, et al.Efficacy of the digit-in-noise test: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Audiol Otol2022; 26: 10–21.
17.
StevensonJSCliftonLKuźmaE, et al.Speech-in-noise hearing impairment is associated with an increased risk of incident dementia in 82,039 UK biobank participants. Alzheimers Dement2022; 18: 445–456.
18.
FrisinaDRFrisinaRD. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res1997; 106: 95–104.
19.
GatesGAAndersonMLFeeneyMP, et al.Central auditory dysfunction in older persons with memory impairment or Alzheimer dementia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2008; 134: 771–777.
20.
LimkitisupasinPJongpradubgiatPUtoomprurkpornN. Hearing screening for older adults with cognitive impairment: a systematic review. J Audiol Otol2024; 28: 260–270.
21.
World Health Organization. ICD-10: international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: tenth revision. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
22.
OlusanyaBODavisACHoffmanHJ. Hearing loss grades and the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Bull World Health Organ2019; 97: 725–728.
23.
SchistermanEFFaraggiDReiserB, et al.Youden Index and the optimal threshold for markers with mass at zero. Stat Med2008; 27: 297–315.
24.
SchoberPBoerCSchwarteLA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg2018; 126: 1763–1768.
25.
MaximLDNieboRUtellMJ. Screening tests: a review with examples. Inhal Toxicol2014; 26: 811–828.
26.
KooleANagtegaalAPHomansNC, et al.Using the digits-in-noise test to estimate age-related hearing loss. Ear Hear2016; 37: 508–513.
27.
SchimmelCCormierKManchaiahV, et al.Digits-in-Noise test as an assessment tool for hearing loss and hearing aids. Audiol Res2024; 14: 342–358.
28.
IdrizbegovicEHederstiernaCDahlquistM, et al.Central auditory function in early Alzheimer's disease and in mild cognitive impairment. Age Ageing2011; 40: 249–254.
29.
UtoomprurkpornNHardyCJDStottJ, et al.The dichotic digit test” as an index indicator for hearing problem in dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Audiol2020; 31: 646–655.
30.
UtoomprurkpornNStottJCostafredaSG, et al.Lack of association between audiogram and hearing disability measures in mild cognitive impairment and dementia: what audiogram does not tell you. Healthcare (Basel)2021; 9: 769.
31.
ZhouXFuXZhangY, et al.Optimization of utilizing the HHIE-S for hearing screening in older people: a cross-sectional study of associated factors. Sci Rep2025; 15: 18080.
32.
TsimpidaDKontopantelisEAshcroftD, et al.Comparison of self-reported measures of hearing with an objective audiometric measure in adults in the English longitudinal study of ageing. JAMA Netw Open2020; 3: e2015009.
33.
KimSYKimHJKimMS, et al.Discrepancy between self-assessed hearing status and measured audiometric evaluation. PLoS One2017; 12: e0182718.
34.
PerfectDGriffithsAWVasconcelos Da SilvaM, et al.Collecting self-report research data with people with dementia within care home clinical trials: benefits, challenges and best practice. Dementia (London)2021; 20: 148–160.
35.
ChangHPHoCYChouP. The factors associated with a self-perceived hearing handicap in elderly people with hearing impairment–results from a community-based study. Ear Hear2009; 30: 576–583.
36.
DawesPFortnumHMooreDR, et al.Hearing in middle age: a population snapshot of 40- to 69-year olds in the United Kingdom. Ear Hear2014; 35: e44–e51.
37.
ArmstrongNMOosterlooBCCrollPH, et al.Discrimination of degrees of auditory performance from the digits-in-noise test based on hearing status. Int J Audiol2020; 59: 897–904.
38.
KnoetzeMManchaiahVMothemelaB, et al.Factors influencing hearing help-seeking and hearing aid uptake in adults: a systematic review of the past decade. Trends Hear2023; 27: 23312165231157255.
39.
SchreiweisBPobiruchinMStrotbaumV, et al.Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of ehealth services: systematic literature analysis. J Med Internet Res2019; 21: e14197.
