Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-11
The bidirectional effect of attention on gamma sensory stimulation: 40 Hz entrainment is weakened by externally-induced distraction but enhanced by internally-induced distraction
Forty-hertz gamma sensory entrainment has been shown to influence neural oscillations, reduce amyloid-β plaques and tau phosphorylation, and improve cognitive functioning in Alzheimer's disease. However, the role of the user's attentional states in modulating this entrainment effect remains poorly understood.
Objective
Here we manipulated users’ attentional state to investigate the effect of focused vs. distracted attention on 40 Hz entrainment.
Methods
During 40 Hz auditory stimulation, participants’ attentional states were manipulated to 3 attentional conditions: (1) attentive (i.e., attention directed towards 40 Hz clicking sound), (2) internally distracted (attention directed towards memory/thought), and (3) externally distracted (i.e., attention directed towards a podcast interview that is overlaid with 40 Hz auditory stimulation).
Results
We observed strong 40 Hz oscillation in the attentive condition, and even stronger oscillation in the internal distraction condition, but minimal activation in the external distraction condition. These patterns are possibly driven by internally-generated stochastic resonance in the internal distraction condition, and sensory competition in the external distraction condition.
Conclusions
In real-world applications, researchers should exercise caution when introducing features aimed at minimizing user boredom and discomfort, as these may create sensory competition and reduce entrainment. Instead, features that guide users’ internal attention may offer a promising direction for future research and implementation. Large-scale studies that employ larger sample size and more diverse participant pool are warranted to verify the findings reported here for better market implementations of the 40 Hz sensory entrainment.
AdaikkanCTsaiLH. Gamma entrainment: impact on neurocircuits, glia, and therapeutic opportunities. Trends Neurosci2020; 43: 24–41.
2.
IaccarinoHFSingerACMartorellAJ, et al.Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature2016; 540: 230–235.
3.
AdaikkanCMiddletonSJMarcoA, et al.Gamma entrainment binds higher-order brain regions and offers neuroprotection. Neuron2019; 102: 929–943.e8.
4.
MartorellAJPaulsonALSukHJ, et al.Multi-sensory gamma stimulation ameliorates Alzheimer’s-associated pathology and improves cognition. Cell2019; 177: 256–271.e22.
5.
ChanDSukHJJacksonBL, et al.Gamma frequency sensory stimulation in mild probable Alzheimer’s dementia patients: results of feasibility and pilot studies. PLoS One2022; 17: e0278412.
6.
YangYLLaiTW. Chronic visual stimulation with LED light flickering at 24, 40, or 80Hz failed to reduce amyloid β load in the 5XFAD Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. eNeuro2023; 10: ENEURO.0189-23.2023.
7.
SoulaMMartín-ÁvilaAZhangY, et al.Forty-hertz light stimulation does not entrain native gamma oscillations in Alzheimer’s disease model mice. Nat Neurosci2023; 26: 570–578.
8.
MurdockMHYangCYSunN, et al.Multisensory gamma stimulation promotes glymphatic clearance of amyloid. Nature2024; 627: 149–156.
9.
SukHJChanDJacksonB, et al.Sensory gamma frequency stimulation in cognitively healthy and AD individuals safely induces highly coordinated 40Hz neural oscillation: a preliminary study of non-invasive sensory stimulation for treating Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement2020; 16: e041146.
10.
Clements-CortesAAhonenHEvansM, et al.Short-term effects of rhythmic sensory stimulation in Alzheimer’s disease: an exploratory pilot study. J Alzheimers Dis2016; 52: 651–660.
11.
ManippaVPalmisanoAFilardiM, et al.An update on the use of gamma (multi) sensory stimulation for Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Front Aging Neurosci2022; 14: 1095081.
12.
SahuPPTsengP. Gamma sensory entrainment for cognitive improvement in neurodegenerative diseases: opportunities and challenges ahead. Front Integr Neurosci2023; 17: 1146687.
13.
HsiungPCHsiehPJ. Forty-Hertz audiovisual stimulation does not have a promoting effect on visual threshold and visual spatial memory. J Vis2024; 24: 8.
14.
ManippaVFilardiMVilellaD, et al.Gamma (60Hz) auditory stimulation improves intrusions but not recall and working memory in healthy adults. Behav Brain Res2024; 456: 114703.
15.
WuCSLinTXLoYH, et al.Single-session gamma sensory stimulation entrains real-time electroencephalography but does not enhance perception, attention, short-term memory, or long-term memory. J Alzheimers Dis Rep2025; 9: 25424823241311927.
16.
ManippaVNitscheMAFilardiM, et al.Temporal gamma tACS and auditory stimulation affect verbal memory in healthy adults. Psychophysiology2024; 61: e14653.
17.
LeeKParkYSuhSW, et al.Optimal flickering light stimulation for entraining gamma waves in the human brain. Sci Rep2021; 11: 16206.
18.
RothCGuptaCNPlisSM, et al.The influence of visuospatial attention on unattended auditory 40Hz responses. Front Hum Neurosci2013; 7: 370.
19.
GanderPEBosnyakDJWolekR, et al.Modulation of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response by attention during acoustic training. Int Congr Ser2007; 1300: 37–40.
20.
PaltoglouAESumnerCJHallDA. Examining the role of frequency specificity in the enhancement and suppression of human cortical activity by auditory selective attention. Hear Res2009; 257: 106–118.
21.
Griskova-BulanovaIRuksenasODapsysK, et al.Distraction task rather than focal attention modulates gamma activity associated with auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs). Clin Neurophysiol2011; 122: 1541–1548.
22.
SahuPPLoYHTsengP. 40Hz Sensory entrainment: is real-time EEG a good indicator of future cognitive improvement?Neurological Sci2024; 45: 1271–1274.
23.
DelormeAMakeigS. EEGLAB: an open-source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. J Neurosci Methods2004; 134: 9–21.
24.
KhachatryanEWittevrongelBReinartzM, et al.Cognitive tasks propagate the neural entrainment in response to a visual 40Hz stimulation in humans. Front Aging Neurosci2022; 14: 1010765.
25.
MarisEOostenveldR. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods2007; 164: 177–190.
26.
ChewTHoKALooCK. Inter- and intra-individual variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at varying current intensities. Brain Stimul2015; 8: 1130–1137.
27.
HsuTYJuanCHTsengP. Individual differences and state-dependent responses in transcranial direct current stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci2016; 10: 643.
28.
KeSCLoYHTsengP. No frequency-specific effect of transcranial random noise stimulation on resting EEG. J Integr Neurosci2024; 23: 59.
29.
SahuPPTsengP. Frontoparietal theta tACS nonselectively enhances encoding, maintenance, and retrieval stages in visuospatial working memory. Neurosci Res2021; 172: 41–50.
30.
TsengPHsuTYChangCF, et al.Unleashing potential: transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex improves change detection in low-performing individuals. J Neurosci2022; 32: 10554–10561.
31.
TsengPChangYTChangCF, et al.The critical role of phase difference in gamma oscillation within the temporoparietal network for binding visual working memory. Sci Rep2016; 6: 32138.
32.
TsengPIuKCJuanCH. The critical role of phase difference in theta oscillation between bilateral parietal cortices for visuospatial working memory. Sci Rep2018; 8: 349.
33.
MiramsLPoliakoffEBrownRJ, et al.Interoceptive and exteroceptive attention have opposite effects on subsequent somatosensory perceptual decision making. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)2012; 65: 926–938.
34.
SimmonsWKAveryJABarcalowJC, et al.Keeping the body in mind: insula functional organization and functional connectivity integrate interoceptive, exteroceptive, and emotional awareness. Hum Brain Mapp2012; 34: 2944–2958.
35.
FarbNASegalZVAndersonAK. Attentional modulation of primary interoceptive and exteroceptive cortices. Cereb Cortex2013; 23: 114–126.
36.
WangXWuQEganL, et al.Anterior insular cortex plays a critical role in interoceptive attention. Elife2019; 8: e42265.
37.
Van der GroenOPotokWWenderothN, et al.Using noise for the better: the effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on the brain and behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2022; 138: 104702.
38.
BrancucciARivoltaDNitscheMA, et al.The effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on motor function: a comprehensive review of the literature. Physiol Behav2023; 261: 114073.
39.
NyhusECurranT. Functional role of gamma and theta oscillations in episodic memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2010; 34: 1023–1035.
40.
SausengPGriesmayrBFreunbergerR, et al.Control mechanisms in working memory: a possible function of EEG theta oscillations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2010; 34: 1015–1022.
41.
KösterMFrieseUSchöneB, et al.Theta–gamma coupling during episodic retrieval in the human EEG. Brain Res2014; 1577: 57–68.
42.
RugeDMuggletonNHoadD, et al.An unavoidable modulation? Sensory attention and human primary motor cortex excitability. Eur J Neurosci2014; 40: 2850–2858.
43.
García-CorderoIEstevesSMikulanEP, et al.Attention, in and out: scalp-level and intracranial EEG correlates of interoception and exteroception. Front Neurosci2017; 11: 411.
44.
AlhoKRinneTHerronTJ, et al.Stimulus-dependent activations and attention-related modulations in the auditory cortex: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Hear Res2014; 307: 29–41.
45.
WangYHollandSK. Comparison of functional network connectivity for passive-listening and active-response narrative comprehension in adolescents. Brain Connect2014; 4: 273–285.
46.
da SilvaMDGonçalvesÓFBrancoD, et al.Revisiting consciousness: distinguishing between states of conscious focused attention and mind wandering with EEG. Conscious Cogn2022; 101: 103332.
47.
DoesburgSMRoggeveenABKitajoK, et al.Large-scale gamma-band phase synchronization and selective attention. Cereb Cortex2008; 18: 386–396.
48.
Tallon-BaudryCBertrandOHénaffMA, et al.Attention modulates gamma-band oscillations differently in the human lateral occipital cortex and fusiform gyrus. Cereb Cortex2005; 15: 654–662.
49.
McDonnellMDAbbottD. What is stochastic resonance? Definitions, misconceptions, debates, and its relevance to biology. PLoS Comput Biol2009; 5: e1000348.
50.
OnoratoID’AlessandroGDi CastroMA, et al.Noise enhances action potential generation in mouse sensory neurons via stochastic resonance. PLoS One2016; 11: e0160950.
51.
RemediosLMabilPFlores-HernándezJ, et al.Effects of short-term random noise electrical stimulation on dissociated pyramidal neurons from the cerebral cortex. Neuroscience2019; 404: 371–386.
52.
WardLMMacLeanSEKirschnerA. Stochastic resonance modulates neural synchronization within and between cortical sources. PLoS One2010; 5: e14371.
53.
HymelMRCranfordJLCarpenterM, et al.Electrophysiologic signs of auditory competition in the human brain. Neurosci Lett2000; 283: 105–108.
54.
Bidet-CauletAFischerCBesleJ, et al.Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. J Neurosci2007; 27: 9252–9261.
55.
BenussiACantoniVGrassiM, et al.Increasing brain gamma activity improves episodic memory and restores cholinergic transmission in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol2022; 92: 322–334.
56.
GüntekinBErdalFBölükbaşB, et al.Alterations of resting-state gamma frequency characteristics in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Cogn Neurodyn2023; 17: 829–844.
57.
ParkYLeeKParkJ, et al.Optimal flickering light stimulation for entraining gamma rhythms in older adults. Sci Rep2022; 12: 15550.
58.
MoreauDWangCHTsengP, et al.Blending transcranial direct current stimulations and physical exercise to maximize cognitive improvement. Front Psychol2015; 6: 678.
59.
MoussaviZKimuraKKehlerL, et al.A novel program to improve cognitive function in individuals with dementia using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and tutored cognitive exercises. Front Aging2021; 2: 632545.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
