Sex differences in the brain's structure, function, and response to interventions are increasingly recognized as critical factors in neurodegenerative diseases like mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease.
Objective
This study investigated sex differences in brain activity among participants classified as having MCI (based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores) during exposure to a 40 Hz rhythmic light (RL) intervention versus a control RL condition.
Methods
Twenty-four participants in the MCI group (mean age = 74.5 years, SD = 9.06; 15 women, 9 men) and 16 age-matched healthy controls (mean age = 70 years, SD = 8.97; 9 women, 7 men) were exposed to both light conditions and underwent electroencephalography recordings, cognitive performance testing (2-back task), and a subjective assessment of sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale).
Results
40 Hz RL increased gamma power significantly, indicating its potential to enhance brain function, especially in the MCI group. Men showed greater neural response and better cognitive performance under the 40 Hz RL while women (particularly in the MCI group) responded more strongly to the control. The sleepiness results were not significant.
Conclusions
There is compelling evidence that 40 Hz RL has sex-dependent effects on gamma oscillations and cognitive performance, particularly in individuals with MCI. Men may benefit more directly from gamma-enhancing interventions, whereas women may require alternative approaches that account for their unique neural responses to light. Further research with larger, more diverse populations is needed to confirm these findings and explore the potential for personalized therapeutic strategies based on sex and cognitive status.
MorettiDV. Theta and alpha EEG frequency interplay in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: evidence from EEG, MRI, and SPECT brain modifications. Front Aging Neurosci2015; 7: 31.
2.
FernandezANoceGDel PercioC, et al.Resting state electroencephalographic rhythms are affected by immediately preceding memory demands in cognitively unimpaired elderly and patients with mild cognitive impairment. Front Aging Neurosci2022; 14: 907130.
3.
GaoLZhangYSterlingK, et al.Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in Alzheimer's disease and its pharmaceutical potential. Transl Neurodegener2022; 11: 4.
4.
AlamalhodaMLeeschFGiovanettiF, et al.Flickering white light stimulation at 60Hz induces strong, widespread neural entrainment and synchrony in healthy subjects. bioRxiv 2025: 2025.2001.2027.634699.
5.
SahinLFigueiroMG. Flickering red-light stimulus for promoting coherent 40Hz neural oscillation: a feasibility study. J Alzheimers Dis2020; 75: 911–921.
6.
IaccarinoHFSingerACMartorellAJ, et al.Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature2016; 540: 230–235.
7.
ZhangYZhangZLuoL, et al.40Hz Light flicker alters human brain electroencephalography microstates and complexity implicated in brain diseases. Front Neurosci2021; 15: 777183.
8.
AdaikkanCMiddletonSJMarcoA, et al.Gamma entrainment binds higher-order brain regions and offers neuroprotection. Neuron2019; 102: 929–943.e928.
9.
BuzsakiGDraguhnA. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science2004; 304: 1926–1929.
10.
FriesP. A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn Sci2005; 9: 474–480.
11.
TraikapiAKonstantinouN. Gamma oscillations in Alzheimer’s disease and their potential therapeutic role. Front Syst Neurosci2021; 15: 782399.
12.
HoshiHShigiharaY. Age- and gender-specific characteristics of the resting-state brain activity: a magnetoencephalography study. Aging2020; 12: 21613–21637.
13.
DuffyFHMcanultyGBAlbertMS. Effects of age upon interhemispheric EEG coherence in normal adults. Neurobiol Aging1996; 17: 587–599.
14.
CaveAEBarryRJ. Sex differences in resting EEG in healthy young adults. Int J Psychophysiol2021; 161: 35–43.
BarthCVillringerASacherJ. Sex hormones affect neurotransmitters and shape the adult female brain during hormonal transition periods. Front Neurosci2015; 9: 37.
17.
CosgroveKPMazureCMStaleyJK. Evolving knowledge of sex differences in brain structure, function, and chemistry. Biol Psychiatry2007; 62: 847–855.
18.
McEwenBSMilnerTA. Understanding the broad influence of sex hormones and sex differences in the brain. J Neurosci Res2017; 95: 24–39.
19.
ShirzadiSDadgostarMEinalouZ, et al.Sex based differences in functional connectivity during a working memory task: an fNIRS study. Front Psychol2024; 15: 1207202.
20.
Vila-MerkleHGonzalez-MartinezACampos-JimenezR, et al.Sex differences in amygdalohippocampal oscillations and neuronal activation in a rodent anxiety model and in response to infralimbic deep brain stimulation. Front Behav Neurosci2023; 17: 1122163.
21.
WiesmanAIWilsonTW. The impact of age and sex on the oscillatory dynamics of visuospatial processing. Neuroimage2019; 185: 513–520.
22.
FujimotoTOkumuraEKodabashiA, et al.Sex differences in gamma band functional connectivity between the frontal lobe and cortical areas during an auditory oddball task, as revealed by imaginary coherence assessment. Open Neuroimag J2016; 10: 85–101.
23.
GurRCGurRE. Complementarity of sex differences in brain and behavior: from laterality to multimodal neuroimaging. J Neurosci Res2017; 95: 189–199.
24.
GurRCMozleyLHMozleyPD, et al.Sex differences in regional cerebral glucose metabolism during a resting state. Science1995; 267: 528–531.
25.
YenerGKiyiIDuzenli-OzturkS, et al.Age-related aspects of sex differences in event-related brain oscillatory responses: A Turkish study. Brain Sci2024; 14: 567.
26.
EkhtiariHTavakoliHAddoloratoG, et al.Transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) for addiction medicine: a consensus paper on the present state of the science and the road ahead. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2019; 104: 118–140.
27.
PeterchevAVWagnerTAMirandaPC, et al.Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices. Brain Stimul2012; 5: 435–453.
28.
LefaucheurJP. Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Handb Clin Neurol2019; 160: 559–580.
29.
ZhigalovADueckerKJensenO. The visual cortex produces gamma band echo in response to broadband visual flicker. PLoS Comp Biol2021; 17: e1009046.
30.
NairuzTSangwooCLeeJH. Photobiomodulation therapy on brain: pioneering an innovative approach to revolutionize cognitive dynamics. Cells2024; 13: 966.
31.
PanWTLiuPMMaD, et al.Advances in photobiomodulation for cognitive improvement by near-infrared derived multiple strategies. J Transl Med2023; 21: 135.
32.
ShenQGuoHYanY. Photobiomodulation for neurodegenerative diseases: a scoping review. Int J Mol Sci2024; 25: 1625.
33.
HendersonVW. Estrogen-containing hormone therapy and Alzheimer's disease risk: understanding discrepant inferences from observational and experimental research. Neuroscience2006; 138: 1031–1039.
34.
NebelRAAggarwalNTBarnesLL, et al.Understanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer's disease: a call to action. Alzheimers Dement2018; 14: 1171–1183.
35.
DumasJAKutzAMNaylorMR, et al.Increased memory load-related frontal activation after estradiol treatment in postmenopausal women. Horm Behav2010; 58: 929–935.
36.
SundermannEEMakiPMRubinLH, et al.Female advantage in verbal memory: evidence of sex-specific cognitive reserve. Neurology2016; 87: 1916–1924.
37.
BuysseDJReynoldsCFMonkTH, et al.The Pittsburgh sleep quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res1989; 28: 193–213.
38.
NasreddineZSPhillipsNABédirianV, et al.The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc2005; 53: 695–699.
39.
BrainardGCHanifinJPGreesonJM, et al.Action spectrum for melatonin regulation in humans: evidence for a novel circadian photoreceptor. J Neurosci2001; 21: 6405–6412.
40.
ThapanKArendtJSkeneDJ. An action spectrum for melatonin suppression: evidence for a novel non-rod, non-cone photoreceptor system in humans. J Physiol2001; 535: 261–267.
41.
JaeggiSMBuschkuehlMPerrigWJ, et al.The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure. Memory2010; 18: 394–412.
42.
ÅkerstedtTGillbergM. Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int J Neurosci1990; 52: 29–37.
43.
WelchP. The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoustics1967; 15: 70–73.
44.
CompstonA. The Berger rhythm: potential changes from the occipital lobes in man, by E.D. Adrian and B.H.C. Matthews (From the Physiological Laboratory, Cambridge). Brain 1934: 57; 355–385. Brain2009; 133: 3–6.
45.
HerrmannCS. Human EEG responses to 1–100Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena. Exp Brain Res2001; 137: 346–353.
FallgatterAJBartschAJZielasekJ, et al.Brain electrical dysfunction of the anterior cingulate in schizophrenic patients. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging2003; 124: 37–48.
48.
GongGHeYEvansAC. Brain connectivity: gender makes a difference. Neuroscientist2011; 17: 575–591.
49.
FriesP. Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. Annu Rev Neurosci2009; 32: 209–224.
50.
MuthukumaraswamySD. Functional properties of human primary motor cortex gamma oscillations. J Neurophysiol2010; 104: 2873–2885.
51.
PfurtschellerGNeuperCKrauszG. Functional dissociation of lower and upper frequency mu rhythms in relation to voluntary limb movement. Clin Neurophysiol2000; 111: 1873–1879.
52.
ChoRYWalkerCPPolizzottoNR, et al.Development of sensory gamma oscillations and cross-frequency coupling from childhood to early adulthood. Cereb Cortex2015; 25: 1509–1518.
53.
TanLLOswaldMJHeinlC, et al.Gamma oscillations in somatosensory cortex recruit prefrontal and descending serotonergic pathways in aversion and nociception. Nat Commun2019; 10: 983.
54.
GalvinCNinanI. Regulation of the mouse medial prefrontal cortical synapses by endogenous estradiol. Neuropsychopharmacology2014; 39: 2086–2094.
55.
GaoRPetersonEJVoytekB. Inferring synaptic excitation/inhibition balance from field potentials. Neuroimage2017; 158: 70–78.
56.
CahillL. Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci2006; 7: 477–484.
57.
KlimeschW. EEG Alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Rev1999; 29: 169–195.
58.
SausengPKlimeschWSchabusM, et al.Fronto-parietal EEG coherence in theta and upper alpha reflect central executive functions of working memory. Int J Psychophysiol2005; 57: 97–103.
59.
TóthBKardosZFileB, et al.Frontal midline theta connectivity is related to efficiency of WM maintenance and is affected by aging. Neurobiol Learn Mem2014; 114: 58–69.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
