Abstract
Background
Blood-based biomarkers (BBMs), including plasma phosphorylated tau (pTau), have been considered as a promising, less-invasive tool for detecting Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology in real-world applications. Plasma pTau levels are known to be elevated in individuals with chronic kidney disease, which may require caution when corrected for renal function since it alters testing performance—decreased sensitivity and increased specificity.
Objective
We aimed to quantify how correcting for renal function affects BBM test performance.
Methods
We analyzed plasma pTau181 and pTau217 measured by multiple platforms, using data from our ongoing trial-ready cohort study in Japan and the ADNI study, in which approximately 30% of participants had mild or moderate renal impairment (eGFR < 60). We compared models with and without renal correction to predict amyloid PET positivity status.
Results
Compared to no correction, adjusting for renal function reduced sensitivity by 0.06–0.07 and increased specificity by 0.04–0.10. It also slightly increased positive predictive value, negative predictive value, balanced accuracy, and area under the curve–each by less than 0.02. These shifts by correction were more pronounced when the participant prevalence of those with renal function was higher, though mainly for sensitivity and specificity.
Conclusions
Our findings demonstrated that applying renal function correction decreases sensitivity and increases specificity of BBM test depending on the prevalence of renal impairment, without undermining overall prediction accuracy. They emphasize the need of considering the background characteristics of the target population when interpreting BBM performances in the real-world settings.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
