While low handgrip strength (HGS) and cognitive impairment could be bidirectionally associated through shared neurological systems, the role of HGS asymmetry for this directional association is not well-understood in males and females.
Objective
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the directional associations between HGS asymmetry and cognitive impairment in Americans by sex.
Methods
The analytical sample included 5298 male and 7070 female participants aged at least 50-years from the 2006–2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. HGS was measured with a handgrip dynamometer. The highest recorded HGS on both hands were included in the quantification of HGS asymmetry. Cognitive function was assessed with the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status. Individual generalized estimating equations evaluated the directional associations of HGS asymmetry and impaired cognitive function.
Results
Categorical asymmetric HGS was associated with 1.25 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.54) greater odds for future cognitive impairment in males. Every unit increase in continuous HGS asymmetry ratio was also associated with 1.37 (CI: 1.04–1.80) greater odds for future cognitive impairment in males. However, cognitive impairment, in males, was not significantly associated with future asymmetric HGS (odds ratio: 1.18; CI: 0.97–1.44). No significant directional associations between asymmetric HGS and impaired cognitive function were observed in females.
Conclusions
Asymmetric HGS, as another marker of muscle dysfunction, may provide direction for the association between muscle and cognitive function, particularly in males. While more research is needed for examining the prognostic value of asymmetric HGS, including asymmetry is feasible in conventional HGS protocol guidelines.
ShaughnessyKAHackneyKJClarkBC, et al.A narrative review of handgrip strength and cognitive functioning: bringing a new characteristic to muscle memory. J Alzheimers Dis2020; 73: 1265–1278.
2.
ZammitARRobitailleAPiccininAM, et al.Associations between aging-related changes in grip strength and cognitive function in older adults: a systematic review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci2019; 74: 519–527.
3.
DuchownyKAAckleySFBrenowitzWD, et al.Associations between handgrip strength and dementia risk, cognition, and neuroimaging outcomes in the UK Biobank cohort study. JAMA Netw Open2022; 5: e2218314–e2218314.
4.
McGrathRRobinson-LaneSGCookS, et al.Handgrip strength is associated with poorer cognitive functioning in aging Americans. J Alzheimers Dis2019; 70: 1187–1196.
5.
Esteban-CornejoIHoFKPetermann-RochaF, et al.Handgrip strength and all-cause dementia incidence and mortality: findings from the UK Biobank prospective cohort study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle2022; 13: 1514–1525.
6.
HendriksSRansonJMPeetoomK, et al.Risk factors for young-onset dementia in the UK Biobank. JAMA Neurol2023; 81: 134–142.
7.
CarsonRG. Get a grip: individual variations in grip strength are a marker of brain health. Neurobiol Aging2018; 71: 189–222.
8.
ChristensenHMackinnonAJKortenA, et al.The” common cause hypothesis” of cognitive aging: evidence for not only a common factor but also specific associations of age with vision and grip strength in a cross-sectional analysis. Psychol Aging2001; 16: 588–599.
9.
SalthouseTAHambrickDZMcGuthryKE. Shared age-related influences on cognitive and noncognitive variables. Psychol Aging1998; 13: 486–500.
10.
EzzatiAKatzMJLiptonML, et al.The association of brain structure with gait velocity in older adults: a quantitative volumetric analysis of brain MRI. Neuroradiology2015; 57: 851–861.
11.
KimGRSunJHanM, et al.Evaluation of the directional relationship between handgrip strength and cognitive function: the Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing2019; 48: 426–432.
12.
McGrathRVincentBMHackneyKJ, et al.The longitudinal associations of handgrip strength and cognitive function in aging Americans. J Am Med Dir Assoc2020; 21: 634–639.
13.
BhasinSTravisonTGManiniTM, et al.Sarcopenia definition: the position statements of the sarcopenia definition and outcomes consortium. J Am Geriatr Soc2020; 68: 1410–1418.
14.
BeaudartCRollandYCruz-JentoftAJ, et al.Assessment of muscle function and physical performance in daily clinical practice. Calcif Tissue Int2019; 105: 1–14.
15.
McGrathR. Maximal handgrip strength alone could be an incomplete measure of muscle function. J Am Med Dir Assoc2021; 22: 882–883.
16.
RobertsHCDenisonHJMartinHJ, et al.A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardized approach. Age Ageing2011; 40: 423–429.
17.
McGrathRTomkinsonGRClarkBC, et al.Assessing additional characteristics of muscle function with digital handgrip dynamometry and accelerometry: framework for a novel handgrip strength protocol. J Am Med Dir Assoc2021; 22: 2313–2318.
18.
MahoneySJHackneyKJJurivichDA, et al.Handgrip strength asymmetry is associated with limitations in individual basic self-care tasks. J Appl Gerontol2022; 41: 450–454.
19.
McGrathRCawthonPMCesariM, et al.Handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness are associated with lower cognitive function: a panel study. J Am Geriatr Soc2020; 68: 2051–2058.
20.
ParkerKRheeYTomkinsonGR, et al.Handgrip weakness and asymmetry independently predict the development of new activity limitations: results from analyses of longitudinal data from the US health and retirement study. J Am Med Dir Assoc2021; 22: 821–826.
21.
JiaSZhaoWGeM, et al.Association of handgrip strength weakness and asymmetry with incidence of motoric cognitive risk syndrome in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Neurology2023; 100: e2342–e2349.
22.
ChenZHoMChauPH. Handgrip strength asymmetry is associated with the risk of neurodegenerative disorders among Chinese older adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle2022; 13: 1013–1023.
23.
ZhangYZhuRGeL, et al.Association of handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness with cognitive function: a nationally representative cohort study. Maturitas2024; 187: 108057.
24.
PengLXiangQZhouY, et al.Associations of handgrip strength weakness and asymmetry with lower cognitive function: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011–2014). J Alzheimers Dis2024; 99: 393–402.
25.
PengT-CChiouJ-MChenY-C, et al.Handgrip strength asymmetry and cognitive impairment risk: insights from a seven-year prospective cohort study. J Nutr Health Aging2024; 28: 100004.
McGrathRLangJJOrtegaFB, et al.Handgrip strength asymmetry is associated with slow gait speed and poorer standing balance in older Americans. Arch Gerontol Geriatr2022; 102: 104716.
33.
PrattJPessanhaLNariciM, et al.Handgrip strength asymmetry as a new biomarker for sarcopenia and individual sarcopenia signatures. Aging Clin Exp Res2023; 35: 2563–2571.
34.
PlassmanBLNewmanTTWelshKA, et al.Properties of the telephone interview for cognitive Status: application in epidemiological and longitudinal studies. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol1994; 7: 235–241.
35.
CrimminsEMKimJKLangaKM, et al.Assessment of cognition using surveys and neuropsychological assessment: the health and retirement study and the aging, demographics, and memory study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci2011; 66: i162–i171.
LangaKMLarsonEBKarlawishJH, et al.Trends in the prevalence and mortality of cognitive impairment in the United States: is there evidence of a compression of cognitive morbidity?Alzheimers Dement2008; 4: 134–144.
38.
FengXCroteauKKoltGS, et al.Does retirement mean more physical activity? A longitudinal study. BMC Public Health2016; 16: 1–7.
39.
TurveyCLWallaceRBHerzogR. A revised CES-D measure of depressive symptoms and a DSM-based measure of major depressive episodes in the elderly. Int Psychogeriatr1999; 11: 139–148.
40.
LiangK-YZegerSL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika1986; 73: 13–22.
41.
MlinacMEFengMC. Assessment of activities of daily living, self-care, and independence. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2016; 31: 506–516.
42.
TunçBSolmazBParkerD, et al.Establishing a link between sex-related differences in the structural connectome and behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci2016; 371: 20150111.
43.
GurRCGurRE. Complementarity of sex differences in brain and behavior: from laterality to multimodal neuroimaging. J Neurosci Res2017; 95: 189–199.
44.
LiuXChenJGengR, et al.Sex-and age-specific mild cognitive impairment is associated with low hand grip strength in an older Chinese cohort. J Int Med Res2020; 48: 0300060520933051.
45.
MikóAPótóLMátraiP, et al.Gender difference in the effects of interleukin-6 on grip strength–A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr2018; 18: 1–9.
46.
FriedLPTangenCMWalstonJ, et al.Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci2001; 56: M146–M157.
OkoyeSMFabiusCDReiderL, et al.Predictors of falls in older adults with and without dementia. Alzheimers Dement2023; 19: 2888–2897.
49.
ChenKKLeeSYPangBWJ, et al.Associations of low handgrip strength and hand laterality with cognitive function and functional mobility–The Yishun study. BMC Geriatr2022; 22: 677.
50.
BruyèreOBeaudartCReginsterJ-Y, et al.Assessment of muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance in clinical practice: an international survey. Eur Geriatr Med2016; 7: 243–246.
51.
MastrudMJuhlKDahlL, et al.Patient and healthcare provider perceptions of handgrip strength in an internal medicine resident clinic. Therapeutics (Basel)2025; 2: 4.
52.
LeongDPTeoKKRangarajanS, et al.Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the prospective urban rural epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet2015; 386: 266–273.
53.
VaishyaRMisraAVaishA, et al.Hand grip strength as a proposed new vital sign of health: a narrative review of evidences. J Health Popul Nutr2024; 43: 7.
54.
Sousa-SantosAAmaralT. Differences in handgrip strength protocols to identify sarcopenia and frailty-A systematic review. BMC Geriatr2017; 17: 238.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
