The human brain demonstrates intrinsic hemispheric asymmetry across structural, functional, and biochemical domains. While cortical gradients provide a multiscale framework for understanding brain network organization, their hemispheric divergence in Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains unexplored.
Objective
To characterize interhemispheric gradient lateralization patterns across the AD continuum and evaluate their clinical correlates.
Methods
Resting-state fMRI data of 45 normal controls (NC), 45 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 45 patients with AD underwent gradient networks processing. Interhemispheric comparisons of mean gradient values were conducted across these groups. A lateralization index (L value) was defined for 17 networks, and differences among the three groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Additionally, correlations between network L values and cognitive scores were examined.
Results
NC and MCI participants exhibited left lateralization of gradient values in the second gradient. In contrast, AD patients showed a loss of interhemispheric lateralization. Notably, AD patients demonstrated reduced lateralization in default mode network (DMN) and control network. The degree of lateralization in DMN was significantly positively correlated with cognitive function.
Conclusions
Our findings indicated that patients with AD demonstrated a diminished lateralization in gradient networks. Quantifying gradient laterality may serve as a multimodal biomarker for early AD detection and therapeutic monitoring.
EstevesMMoreiraPSMarquesP, et al.Asymmetrical subcortical plasticity entails cognitive progression in older individuals. Aging Cell2019; 18: e12857.
2.
KongX-ZMathiasSRGuadalupeT, et al.Mapping cortical brain asymmetry in 17,141 healthy individuals worldwide via the ENIGMA Consortium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2018; 115: E5154–E5163.
3.
VerébDKovácsMAKocsisK, et al.Functional connectivity lateralisation shift of resting state networks is linked to visuospatial memory and white matter microstructure in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Brain Topogr2022; 35: 268–275.
4.
ChanceSA. The cortical microstructural basis of lateralized cognition: a review. Front Psychol2014; 5: 20.
5.
HugdahlKWesterhausenR. Speech processing asymmetry revealed by dichotic listening and functional brain imaging. Neuropsychologia2016; 93: 466–481.
RingoJLDotyRWDemeterS, et al.Time is of the essence: a conjecture that hemispheric specialization arises from interhemispheric conduction delay. Cereb Cortex1994; 4: 331–343.
8.
EstevesMGanzESousaN, et al.Asymmetrical brain plasticity: physiology and pathology. Neuroscience2021; 454: 3–14.
9.
GüntürkünOStröckensFOcklenburgS. Brain lateralization: a comparative perspective. Physiol Rev2020; 100: 1019–1063.
10.
GeschwindNGalaburdaAM. Cerebral lateralization: biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Arch Neurol1985; 42: 428.
11.
HirnsteinMHugdahlKHausmannM. Cognitive sex differences and hemispheric asymmetry: a critical review of 40 years of research. Laterality2019; 24: 204–252.
AgcaogluOMillerRDamarajuE, et al.Decreased hemispheric connectivity and decreased intra- and inter- hemisphere asymmetry of resting state functional network connectivity in schizophrenia. Brain Imaging Behav2018; 12: 615–630.
14.
LiuHZhangLXiQ, et al.Changes in brain lateralization in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance study from Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Front Neurol2018; 9: 3.
15.
ThompsonPMHayashiKMDe ZubicarayG, et al.Dynamics of gray matter loss in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci2003; 23: 994–1005.
16.
KimJHLeeJWKimGH, et al.Cortical asymmetries in normal, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging2012; 33: 1959–1966.
17.
MarguliesDSGhoshSSGoulasA, et al.Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2016; 113: 12574–12579.
18.
HuntenburgJMBazinP-LMarguliesDS. Large-scale gradients in human cortical organization. Trends Cogn Sci2018; 22: 21–31.
19.
VogelJWLa JoieRGrotheMJ, et al.A molecular gradient along the longitudinal axis of the human hippocampus informs large-scale behavioral systems. Nat Commun2020; 11: 960.
20.
HansenJYShafieiGMarkelloRD, et al.Mapping neurotransmitter systems to the structural and functional organization of the human neocortex. Nat Neurosci2022; 25: 1569–1581.
21.
HongS-JVos De WaelRBethlehemRAI, et al.Atypical functional connectome hierarchy in autism. Nat Commun2019; 10: 1022.
22.
BayrakŞKhalilAAVillringerK, et al.The impact of ischemic stroke on connectivity gradients. Neuroimage Clin2019; 24: 101947.
23.
DongDLuoCGuellX, et al.Compression of cerebellar functional gradients in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull2020; 46: 1282–1295.
24.
LiangXZhaoCJinX, et al.Sex-related human brain asymmetry in hemispheric functional gradients. Neuroimage2021; 229: 117761.
25.
Gonzalez AlamTRDJMckeownBLAGaoZ, et al.A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition. Brain Struct Funct2022; 227: 631–654.
26.
HuQLiYWuY, et al.Brain network hierarchy reorganization in Alzheimer’s disease: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Hum Brain Mapp2022; 43: 3498–3507.
27.
HongS-JXuTNikolaidisA, et al.Toward a connectivity gradient-based framework for reproducible biomarker discovery. Neuroimage2020; 223: 117322.
28.
KnodtARElliottMLWhitmanET, et al.Test–retest reliability and predictive utility of a macroscale principal functional connectivity gradient. Hum Brain Mapp2023; 44: 6399–6417.
29.
KongRYangQGordonE, et al.Individual-specific areal-level parcellations improve functional connectivity prediction of behavior. Cereb Cortex2021; 31: 4477–4500.
30.
ZhouZ-XZuoX-N. Editorial: lifespan connectome gradients for a road to mental health. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry2024; 63: 25–28.
31.
BanksSJZhuangXBayramE, et al.Default mode network lateralization and memory in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis2018; 66: 1223–1234.
32.
NielsenJAZielinskiBAFletcherPT, et al.Abnormal lateralization of functional connectivity between language and default mode regions in autism. Mol Autism2014; 5: 8.
33.
BishopDVM. Cerebral asymmetry and language development: cause, correlate, or consequence?Science2013; 340: 1230531.
34.
WilliamsLZJFitzgibbonSPBozekJ, et al.Structural and functional asymmetry of the neonatal cerebral cortex. Nat Hum Behav2023; 7: 942–955.
35.
AgcaogluOMillerRMayerAR, et al.Lateralization of resting state networks and relationship to age and gender. Neuroimage2015; 104: 310–325.
36.
YangCZhongSZhouX, et al.The abnormality of topological asymmetry between hemispheric brain white matter networks in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Front Aging Neurosci2017; 9: 261.
37.
SmallwoodJBernhardtBCLeechR, et al.The default mode network in cognition: a topographical perspective. Nat Rev Neurosci2021; 22: 503–513.
38.
BucknerRLAndrews-HannaJRSchacterDL. The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci2008; 1124: 1–38.
39.
BucknerRLCarrollDC. Self-projection and the brain. Trends Cogn Sci2007; 11: 49–57.
40.
GordonEMLaumannTOMarekS, et al.Default-mode network streams for coupling to language and control systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2020; 117: 17308–17319.
41.
MisiuraMBHowellJCWuJ, et al.Race modifies default mode connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease. Transl Neurodegener2020; 9: 8.
42.
ZhaoQSangXMetmerH, et al.Functional segregation of executive control network and frontoparietal network in Alzheimer’s disease. Cortex2019; 120: 36–48.
43.
YuanPZhangMTongL, et al.PLD3 Affects axonal spheroids and network defects in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature2022; 612: 328–337.
44.
LiuYYuCZhangX, et al.Impaired long distance functional connectivity and weighted network architecture in Alzheimer’s disease. Cereb Cortex2014; 24: 1422–1435.
45.
CabezaR. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychol Aging2002; 17: 85–100.
46.
Reuter-LorenzPACappellKA. Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci2008; 17: 177–182.
47.
FringsLHellwigSSpehlTS, et al.Asymmetries of amyloid-β burden and neuronal dysfunction are positively correlated in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain2015; 138: 3089–3099.
48.
LiXLiT-QAndreasenN, et al.The association between biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid and structural changes in the brain in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Intern Med2014; 275: 418–427.
49.
AlbericiABenussiAPremiE, et al.Clinical, genetic, and neuroimaging features of early onset Alzheimer disease: the challenges of diagnosis and treatment. Curr Alzheimer Res2014; 11: 909–917.
50.
JacobsHILVan BoxtelMPJJollesJ, et al.Parietal cortex matters in Alzheimer’s disease: an overview of structural, functional and metabolic findings. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2012; 36: 297–309.
51.
KoenJDSrokovaSRuggMD. Age-related neural dedifferentiation and cognition. Current Opin Behav Sci2020; 32: 7–14.
52.
JacobsonMWDelisDCLansingA, et al.Asymmetries in global-local processing ability in elderly people with the apolipoprotein e-epsilon4 allele. Neuropsychology2005; 19: 822–829.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
