Existing studies on Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) performance in South Korea have not fully accounted for key demographic factors and often include limited sample sizes. This study examines ROCF performance in a non-demented aging sample to explore cognitive variability and provide comparative data for future research.
Objective
This study investigates the effects of age, education, and gender on performance on the ROCF test copy, immediate recall, and delayed recall trials for middle-aged and elderly Koreans.
Methods
The ROCF was administered to 461 community-dwelling, non-demented adults aged 50 to 90 years (M = 70.1, SD = 8.4), with 0 to 25 years of education (M = 11.4, SD = 4.7). We analyzed cognitive performance across age groups (50–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80–90 years), education levels (0–8, 9–12, ≥13 years), and gender to characterize cognitive variability in a non-demented aging sample. Analysis of variance and stepwise multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess the relative contributions of the demographic variables.
Results
Lower education levels, advanced age, and female gender were associated with poorer performance. Education accounted for the greatest variation in the copy trials, whereas age accounted for the largest portion of the variance in the recall trials.
Conclusions
The findings highlight the necessity of accounting for age, education, and gender when interpreting ROCF test scores in aging populations, especially in South Korea where educational attainment among older adults varies widely. Based on these findings, we established reference values stratified by these demographic variables for middle-aged and older Korean adults.
TremblayM-PPotvinOCallahanBL, et al.Normative data for the Rey–Osterrieth and the Taylor complex figure tests in Quebec-French people. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2015; 30: 78–87.
2.
RabinLABarrWBBurtonLA. Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: a survey of INS, NAN, and APA division 40 members. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2005; 20: 33–65.
3.
KneeboneACLeeGPWadeLT, et al.Rey complex figure: figural and spatial memory before and after temporal lobectomy for intractable epilepsy. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2007; 13: 664–671.
4.
SargéniusHLBylsmaFWLydersenS, et al.Visual-constructional ability in individuals with severe obesity: Rey complex figure test accuracy and the Q-score. Front Psychol2017; 8: 1629.
5.
KramerJHWellsAM. The role of perceptual bias in complex figure recall. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol2004; 26: 838–845.
6.
SapozhnikovaASmithBL. Assessment intervention using the Rey–Osterrieth complex figure test: a clinical illustration. J Pers Assess2017; 99: 503–509.
7.
VicenteSGRamos-UsugaDBarbosaF, et al.Regression-based norms for the Hopkins verbal learning test-revised and the rey–osterrieth complex figure in a Portuguese adult population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2021; 36: 587–596.
8.
DarwishHZeinounPFarranN, et al.Rey figure test with recognition trial: normative data for Lebanese adults. Clin Neuropsychol2018; 32: 102–113.
9.
BinettiGCappaSFMagniE, et al.Visual and spatial perception in the early phase of Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology1998; 12: 29.
10.
MachuldaMIvnikRSmithG, et al.Mayo's older Americans normative studies: visual form discrimination and copy trial of the rey–osterrieth complex figure. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol2007; 29: 377–384.
11.
TsataliMEmmanouelAGialaouzidisM, et al.Rey complex figure test (RCFT): norms for the Greek older adult population. Appl Neuropsychol Adult2022; 29: 958–966.
12.
VogelAStokholmJJørgensenK. Performances on Rey auditory verbal learning test and Rey complex figure test in a healthy, elderly Danish sample–reference data and validity issues. Scand J Psychol2012; 53: 26–31.
13.
KohSLeeYKimS, et al.A study of malingering discrimination index of Rey complex figure test; RCFT. Korean J Clin Psychol2008; 27: 653–e667.
14.
ZhangXLvLMinG, et al.Overview of the complex figure test and its clinical application in neuropsychiatric disorders, including copying and recall. Front Neurol2021; 12: 680474.
15.
KangYJahngSNaD. Seoul neuropsychological screening battery (SNSB). (SNSB-II). Incheon: Human Brain Research & Consulting, 2012.
ArdilaARosselliM. Educational effects on the ROCF performance. In: KnightJAKaplanE (eds) The handbook of Rey-Osterrieth complex figure usage: clinical and research applications. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., 2003, pp.271–281.
18.
RosselliMArdilaA. Effects of age, education, and gender on the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure. Clin Neuropsychol1991; 5: 370–376.
19.
ByunMSYiDLeeJH, et al.Korean Brain aging study for the early diagnosis and prediction of Alzheimer's disease: methodology and baseline sample characteristics. Psychiatry Investig2017; 14: 851.
20.
LeeJHLeeKULeeDY, et al.Development of the Korean version of the consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease assessment packet (CERAD-K) clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci2002; 57: P47–P53.
21.
AlbertMSDeKoskySTDicksonD, et al.The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the national institute on aging-Alzheimer’s association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Focus2013; 11: 96–106.
22.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
23.
MeyersJEMeyersKR. Rey complex figure test under four different administration procedures. Clin Neuropsychol1995; 9: 63–67.
24.
StrausEShermanESpreenO. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp.267–270.
25.
CaffarraPVezzadiniGDieciF, et al.Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci2002; 22: 443–447.
26.
L’Ecuyer-GiguèreFGreffouSTabetS, et al.Visual memory performance following mild traumatic brain injury and its relationship with intellectual functioning. Appl Neuropsychol Adult2020; 27: 219–231.
27.
LeeDYLeeKULeeJH, et al.A normative study of the CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery in the Korean elderly. J Int Neuropsychol Soc2004; 10: 72–81.
28.
PaukerJD. Constructing overlapping cell tables to maximize the clinical usefulness of normative test data: rationale and an example from neuropsychology. J Clin Psychol1988; 44: 930–933.
29.
HanJYSeoEHYiD, et al.A normative study of total scores of the CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery in an educationally diverse elderly population. Int Psychogeriatr2014; 26: 1897–1904.
30.
JoungHYiDAhnH, et al.Normative study of the block design test for adults aged 55 years and older in Korean aging population. Psychiatry Invest2021; 18: 539.
31.
BooneKBLesserIMHill-GutierrezE, et al.Rey-Osterrieth complex figure performance in healthy, older adults: relationship to age, education, sex, and IQ. Clin Neuropsychol1993; 7: 22–28.
32.
FlickerCFerrisSHCrookT, et al.Cognitive decline in advanced age: future directions for the psychometric differentiation of normal and pathological age changes in cognitive function. Dev Neuropsychol1986; 2: 309–322.
33.
FlickerCFerrisSHReisbergB. A two-year longitudinal study of cognitive function in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol1993; 6: 84–96.
34.
PontónMOSatzPHerreraL, et al.Normative data stratified by age and education for the neuropsychological screening battery for Hispanics (NeSBHIS): initial report. J Int Neuropsychol Soc1996; 2: 96–104.
35.
ChiulliSJHaalandKYLarueA, et al.Impact of age on drawing the Rey-Osterrieth figure. Clin Neuropsychol1995; 9: 219–224.
36.
LuPHBooneKBCozolinoL, et al.Effectiveness of the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test and the Meyers and Meyers recognition trial in the detection of suspect effort. Clin Neuropsychol2003; 17: 426–440.
37.
BlaskewitzNMertenTBrockhausR. Detection of suboptimal effort with the Rey complex figure test and recognition trial. Appl Neuropsychol2009; 16: 54–61.
38.
SilmGPedasteMTähtK. The relationship between performance and test-taking effort when measured with self-report or time-based instruments: a meta-analytic review. Educ Res Rev2020; 31: 100335.
39.
BrockmoleJRParraMASalaSD, et al.Do binding deficits account for age-related decline in visual working memory?Psychon Bull Rev2008; 15: 543–547.
40.
KoPCDudaBHusseyE, et al.Understanding age-related reductions in visual working memory capacity: examining the stages of change detection. Atten Percept Psychophys2014; 76: 2015–2030.
41.
BarelETzischinskyO. Age and sex differences in verbal and visuospatial abilities. Adv Cogn Psychol2018; 2: 51.
42.
VoyerDVoyerSDSaint-AubinJ. Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: a meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev2017; 24: 307–334.
43.
BerryDTAllenRSSchmittFA. Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: psychometric characteristics in a geriatric sample. Clin Neuropsychol1991; 5: 143–153.
44.
Peña-CasanovaJGramunt-FombuenaNQuiñones-ÚbedaS, et al.Spanish multicenter normative studies (NEURONORMA project): norms for the Rey–Osterrieth complex figure (copy and memory), and free and cued selective reminding test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2009; 24: 371–393.
45.
GallagherCBurkeT. Age, gender and IQ effects on the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test. Br J Clin Psychol2007; 46: 35–45.
46.
MitchellMBCiminoCRBenitezA, et al.Cognitively stimulating activities: effects on cognition across four studies with up to 21 years of longitudinal data. J Aging Res2012; 2012: 461592.
47.
BaldiviaBAndradeVMBuenoOFA. Contribution of education, occupation and cognitively stimulating activities to the formation of cognitive reserve. Dement Neuropsychol2008; 2: 173–182.
PaikIIhmJ. The effect of higher education for women on wage differentials. J Econ Finance Educ2009; 18: 1–26.
50.
ArdilaARosselliM. Effects of educational level on visuospatial and constructional abilities. Arch Clin Neuropsychol1989; 4: 127–127.
51.
Ardila AlfredoRM. Illiterates and cognition: the impact of education. New York, NY: International Handbook of Cross-Cultural Neuropsychology, 2007.
52.
FastenauPSDenburgNLHuffordBJ. Adult norms for the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test and for supplemental recognition and matching trials from the extended complex figure test. Clin Neuropsychol1999; 13: 30–47.
53.
LavoieMCallahanBBellevilleS, et al.Normative data for the dementia rating scale-2 in the French-Quebec population. Clin Neuropsychol2013; 27: 1150–1166.
54.
KimJLParkJHKimBJ, et al.Interactive influences of demographics on the Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and the demographics-adjusted norms for MMSE in elderly Koreans. Int Psychogeriatr2012; 24: 642–650.
