Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an efficient intervention for alleviating cognitive symptoms in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the optimal treatment duration for high efficacy remains unclear.
Objective
This study investigates the effects of 2-week and 4-week rTMS on neural network plasticity and cognitive improvement, aiming to identify the optimal treatment duration for cognitive impairment.
Methods
rTMS was administered to cognitively impaired patients over 2-week and 4-week periods, exploring its effects on cognitive improvement and induced neural circuits. The study also examines the predictive value of these neural circuits for individual treatment responses.
Results
The 4-week rTMS treatment significantly outperformed the 2-week course in improving cognitive function. Neural activity analysis identified the precuneus as a key region for episodic memory. Changes in brain regions, particularly within the default mode network (DMN), visual network (VN), and motor network (MN), were associated with cognitive improvements. Baseline functional connectivity in these regions predicted changes in general cognition (r = 0.724, p < 0.001) and episodic memory (r = 0.447, p = 0.022) after rTMS.
Conclusions
Extended rTMS treatment enhances cognitive performance in cognitive impairment patients, with the 4-week course showing superior effects. Reduced connectivity in the DMN following rTMS was linked to cognitive improvements. The neural network baseline can predict patients’ treatment responses.
KnopmanDSAmievaHPetersenRC, et al.Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers2021; 7: 33.
2.
ScheltensPDe StrooperBKivipeltoM, et al.Alzheimer's disease. Lancet2021; 397: 1577–1590.
3.
SarikayaIKamelWAAteyahKK, et al.Visual versus semiquantitative analysis of (18)F- fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography brain images in patients with dementia. World J Nucl Med2021; 20: 82–89.
4.
van DyckCHSwansonCJAisenP, et al.Lecanemab in early Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med2023; 388: 9–21.
5.
ChanATCIpRTFTranJYS, et al.Computerized cognitive training for memory functions in mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digit Med2024; 7: 1.
6.
PetrellaJRMichaelAMQianM, et al.Impact of computerized cognitive training on default mode network connectivity in subjects at risk for Alzheimer's disease: a 78-week randomized controlled trial. J Alzheimers Dis2023; 91: 483–494.
7.
PowerJDSchlaggarBL. Neural plasticity across the lifespan. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol2017; 6: e216.
8.
MenardiADottiLAmbrosiniE, et al.Transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of its efficacy as a function of protocol characteristics and degree of personalization. J Neurol2022; 269: 5283–5301.
9.
BarkerATJalinousRFreestonIL. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet1985; 1: 1106–1107.
10.
JannatiAObermanLMRotenbergA, et al.Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychopharmacology2023; 48: 191–208.
11.
FeldmanDE. Synaptic mechanisms for plasticity in neocortex. Annu Rev Neurosci2009; 32: 33–55.
12.
ChouYHSundmanMTon ThatV, et al.Cortical excitability and plasticity in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation studies. Ageing Res Rev2022; 79: 101660.
13.
LefaucheurJPAlemanABaekenC, et al.Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): an update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol2020; 131: 474–528.
14.
GuLXuHQianF. Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on Alzheimer's disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis2022; 9: 410–424.
15.
TeselinkJBawaKKKooGK, et al.Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on global cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ageing Res Rev2021; 72: 101499.
16.
BagattiniCZanniMBaroccoF, et al.Enhancing cognitive training effects in Alzheimer's disease: rTMS as an add-on treatment. Brain Stimul2020; 13: 1655–1664.
17.
CuiHRenRLinG, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induced hypoconnectivity within the default mode network yields cognitive improvements in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled study. J Alzheimers Dis2019; 69: 1137–1151.
18.
PadalaPRPadalaKPLensingSY, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for apathy in mild cognitive impairment: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over pilot study. Psychiatry Res2018; 261: 312–318.
19.
XuYQiuZZhuJ, et al.The modulation effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Neurosci2019; 20: 2.
20.
FitzsimmonsSOostraEPostmaTS, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced neuroplasticity and the treatment of psychiatric disorders: state of the evidence and future opportunities. Biol Psychiatry2024; 95: 592–600.
21.
KlomjaiWKatzRLackmy-ValleeA. Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS). Ann Phys Rehabil Med2015; 58: 208–213.
22.
LuberBLisanbySH. Enhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuroimage2014; 85: 961–970.
23.
LiGMcLaughlinDWPeskinCS. A biochemical description of postsynaptic plasticity-with timescales ranging from milliseconds to seconds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2024; 121: e2311709121.
24.
ChenHFShengXNYangZY, et al.Multi-networks connectivity at baseline predicts the clinical efficacy of left angular gyrus-navigated rTMS in the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease: a sham-controlled study. CNS Neurosci Ther2023; 29: 2267–2280.
25.
ChenYHouXZhouH, et al.Distinguishable neural circuit mechanisms associated with the clinical efficacy of rTMS in aMCI patients. Cereb Cortex2024; 34: bhae310.
26.
JessenFAmariglioREvan BoxtelM, et al.A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement2014; 10: 844–852.
27.
McKhannGMKnopmanDSChertkowH, et al.The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement2011; 7: 263–269.
28.
PetersenRC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med2004; 256: 183–194.
29.
YangZShengXQinR, et al.Cognitive improvement via left angular gyrus-navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation inducing the neuroplasticity of thalamic system in amnesic mild cognitive impairment patients. J Alzheimers Dis2022; 86: 537–551.
30.
WangJXRogersLMGrossEZ, et al.Targeted enhancement of cortical-hippocampal brain networks and associative memory. Science2014; 345: 1054–1057.
31.
HuXJiangYJiangX, et al.Altered functional connectivity density in subtypes of Parkinson's disease. Front Hum Neurosci2017; 11: 458.
32.
ChenXBlumbergerDMDownarJ, et al.Depressive symptom trajectories with prolonged rTMS treatment. Brain Stimul2024; 17: 525–532.
33.
HuttonTMAaronsonSTCarpenterLL, et al.Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry. Brain Stimul2023; 16: 1510–1521.
34.
PalopJJMuckeL. Amyloid-beta-induced neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: from synapses toward neural networks. Nat Neurosci2010; 13: 812–818.
35.
SelkoeDJ. Alzheimer's disease is a synaptic failure. Science2002; 298: 789–791.
36.
KochGSpampinatoD. Alzheimer disease and neuroplasticity. Handb Clin Neurol2022; 184: 473–479.
37.
Di LorenzoFMottaCCasulaEP, et al.LTP-like cortical plasticity predicts conversion to dementia in patients with memory impairment. Brain Stimul2020; 13: 1175–1182.
38.
ZiemannUSiebnerHR. Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity. Brain Stimul2008; 1: 60–66.
39.
GaoYQiuYYangQ, et al.Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training for cognitive function and activities of daily living in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev2023; 87: 101919.
40.
YangTLiuWHeJ, et al.The cognitive effect of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with cognitive training in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Res Ther2024; 16: 140.
41.
TomasiDVolkowND. Functional connectivity hubs in the human brain. Neuroimage2011; 57: 908–917.
42.
TomasiDVolkowND. Functional connectivity density mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2010; 107: 9885–9890.
43.
LundstromBNPeterssonKMAnderssonJ, et al.Isolating the retrieval of imagined pictures during episodic memory: activation of the left precuneus and left prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage2003; 20: 1934–1943.
44.
LouHCLuberBCrupainM, et al.Parietal cortex and representation of the mental Self. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2004; 101: 6827–6832.
45.
CavannaAETrimbleMR. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain2006; 129: 564–583.
46.
BucknerRLAndrews-HannaJRSchacterDL. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci2008; 1124: 1–38.
Whitfield-GabrieliSFordJM. Default mode network activity and connectivity in psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol2012; 8: 49–76.
49.
PalmqvistSSchollMStrandbergO, et al.Earliest accumulation of beta-amyloid occurs within the default-mode network and concurrently affects brain connectivity. Nat Commun2017; 8: 1214.
50.
Andrews-HannaJR. The brain's default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation. Neuroscientist2012; 18: 251–270.
51.
Andrews-HannaJRSmallwoodJSprengRN. The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Ann N Y Acad Sci2014; 1316: 29–52.
52.
SperlingRALaviolettePSO'KeefeK, et al.Amyloid deposition is associated with impaired default network function in older persons without dementia. Neuron2009; 63: 178–188.
53.
MyersNPasquiniLGottlerJ, et al.Within-patient correspondence of amyloid-beta and intrinsic network connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. Brain2014; 137: 2052–2064.
54.
GiorgioJAdamsJNMaassA, et al.Amyloid induced hyperexcitability in default mode network drives medial temporal hyperactivity and early tau accumulation. Neuron2024; 112: 676–686.e674.
55.
WuXJiGJGengZ, et al.Strengthened theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation as an adjunctive treatment for Alzheimer's disease: an open-label pilot study. Brain Stimul2020; 13: 484–486.
56.
DipasqualeOGriffantiLClericiM, et al.High-dimensional ICA analysis detects within-network functional connectivity damage of default-mode and sensory-motor networks in Alzheimer's disease. Front Hum Neurosci2015; 9: 43.
57.
FabbroSPiccoloDVescoviMC, et al.Resting-state functional-MRI in iNPH: can default mode and motor networks changes improve patient selection and outcome? Preliminary report. Fluids Barriers CNS2023; 20: 7.
58.
MartenLESinghAMuellenAM, et al.Motor performance and functional connectivity between the posterior cingulate cortex and supplementary motor cortex in bipolar and unipolar depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci2024; 274: 655–671.
59.
WuJHeYLiangS, et al.Computerized cognitive training enhances episodic memory by down-modulating posterior cingulate-precuneus connectivity in older persons with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry2023; 31: 820–832.
60.
SabbaghMSadowskyCTousiB, et al.Effects of a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and cognitive training intervention in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement2020; 16: 641–650.
61.
LiSLanXLiuY, et al.Unlocking the potential of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to optimize intervention strategies. J Alzheimers Dis2024; 98: 481–503.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
