Dementia impacts individuals, families, and society, necessitating effective prevention strategies.
Objective
To evaluate the feasibility of a community-adapted multi-domain intervention for dementia prevention among older adults in Obu City, Japan and how uncertainties in implementing definitive trials can be reduced.
Methods
A 12-month one-arm intervention trial was conducted with 80 community-dwelling older adults aged 65–86 years from two district regions. The multi-domain intervention included physical exercise, nutrition guidance, cognitive training, social participation, and vascular risk management. The primary outcome was the continuation rate, defined as the proportion of participants attending >60% of classes from the initial assessment to 6 months. Secondary outcomes, such as fidelity, acceptability, and appropriateness, were assessed through qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Additionally, health outcomes, including cognitive function and overall lifestyle, were evaluated.
Results
The study achieved continuation rates of 75% and 76% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, indicating high feasibility. Participants showed high program acceptability (average acceptance score, 4.4 of 5). Fidelity was high regarding content coverage and duration, although the frequency and coverage varied between study sites. Cognitive function remained stable; food-diversity status improved significantly over the study period, though the absence of a control group limits causal interpretation of these changes.
Conclusions
The community-adapted multi-domain intervention for dementia prevention demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability among older adults. Our findings can help reduce uncertainties and support planning future definitive trials to evaluate the effectiveness of community-based dementia-prevention programs.
SleemanKEde BritoMEtkindS, et al.The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions. Lancet Glob Health2019; 7: e883–e892.
2.
PapastavrouEKalokerinouAPapacostasSS, et al.Caring for a relative with dementia: family caregiver burden. J Adv Nurs2007; 58: 446–457.
3.
SadoMNinomiyaAShikimotoR, et al.The estimated cost of dementia in Japan, the most aged society in the world. PLoS One2018; 13: e0206508.
4.
BurgenerSCBuckwalterKPerkhounkovaY, et al.The effects of perceived stigma on quality of life outcomes in persons with early-stage dementia: longitudinal findings: part 2. Dementia (London)2015; 14: 609–632.
5.
MukadamNLivingstonG. Reducing the stigma associated with dementia: approaches and goals. Aging Health2012; 8: 377–386.
6.
KurodaYKoyamaYYoshidaH, et al.Preparation of an “information booklet for returnees” – building trust through collaboration with local communities. Radioprotection2020; 55: 309–315.
7.
NagataniMTanakaTSonB-K, et al.Oral frailty as a risk factor for mild cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults: kashiwa study. Exp Gerontol2023; 172: 112075.
8.
van DyckCHSwansonCJAisenP, et al.Lecanemab in early Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med2023; 388: 9–21.
9.
NganduTLehtisaloJSolomonA, et al.A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet2015; 385: 2255–2263.
10.
KivipeltoMMangialascheFSnyderHM, et al.World-Wide FINGERS network: a global approach to risk reduction and prevention of dementia. Alzheimers Dement2020; 16: 1078–1094.
11.
SakuraiTSugimotoTAkatsuH, et al.Japan-Multimodal Intervention trial for the prevention of dementia: a randomized controlled trial. Alzheimers Dement2024; 20: 3918–3930.
12.
SuzukiTMakizakoHDoiT, et al.Community-based intervention for prevention of dementia in Japan. J Prev Alzheimers Dis2015; 2: 71–76.
13.
KulmalaJRosenbergANganduT, et al.Facilitators and barriers to implementing lifestyle intervention programme to prevent cognitive decline. Eur J Public Health2021; 31: 816–822.
14.
KurodaYFujitaKSugimotoT, et al.Feasibility of a community-adapted multi-domain intervention for dementia prevention among older adults: a research protocol. Arch Public Health2023; 81: 191.
15.
BobittJJarrottSE. Strengthening aging research through dissemination and implementation science methods. Gerontologist2023; 63: 401–404.
16.
ChambersDANortonWE. The adaptome: advancing the science of intervention adaptation. Am J Prev Med2016; 51: S124–S131.
17.
CabassaLJBaumannAA. A two-way street: bridging implementation science and cultural adaptations of mental health treatments. Implement Sci2013; 8: 90.
18.
Wiltsey StirmanSBaumannAAMillerCJ. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci2019; 14: 58.
19.
ShimadaHMakizakoHDoiT, et al.Cognitive impairment and disability in older Japanese adults. PLoS One2016; 11: e0158720.
20.
SugimotoTSakuraiTAkatsuH, et al.The Japan-multimodal intervention trial for prevention of dementia (J-MINT): the study protocol for an 18-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Prev Alzheimers Dis2021; 8: 465–476.
21.
ChapmanSBAslanSSpenceJS, et al.Shorter term aerobic exercise improves brain, cognition, and cardiovascular fitness in aging. Front Aging Neurosci2013; 5: 75.
22.
StimpsonNJDavisonGJavadiA-H. Joggin’ the noggin: towards a physiological understanding of exercise-induced cognitive benefits. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2018; 88: 177–186.
23.
ShimadaHMakizakoHDoiT, et al.Effects of combined physical and cognitive exercises on cognition and mobility in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc2018; 19: 584–591.
24.
LiKZHRoudaiaELussierM, et al.Benefits of cognitive dual-task training on balance performance in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci2010; 65: 1344–1352.
25.
Der WarburtonGNJamnikVKBredinSSD, et al.Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity clearance: consensus. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab2011; 36: S266–S298. Document 2011.
26.
KurodaYGotoASugimotoT, et al.Participatory approaches for developing a practical handbook integrating health information for supporting individuals with mild cognitive impairment and their families. Health Expect2024; 27: e13870.
27.
OtsukaRNishitaYTangeC, et al.Dietary diversity decreases the risk of cognitive decline among Japanese older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int2017; 17: 937–944.
28.
SasakiS. What is the scientific definition of the Japanese dies from the viewpoint of nutrition and health. Nutr Rev2020; 78: 18–26.
29.
KouzukiMFurukawaSMitaniK, et al.Examination of the cognitive function of Japanese community-dwelling older adults in a class for preventing cognitive decline during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One2021; 16: e0248446.
30.
KouzukiMKatoTWada-IsoeK, et al.A program of exercise, brain training, and lecture to prevent cognitive decline. Ann Clin Transl Neurol2020; 7: 318–328.
31.
ShimadaHLeeSHaradaK, et al.Study protocol of a comprehensive activity promotion program for the prevention of dementia: a randomized controlled trial protocol. J Prev Alzheimers Dis2022; 9: 376–384.
32.
KellyMEDuffHKellyS, et al.The impact of social activities, social networks, social support and social relationships on the cognitive functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review. Syst Rev2017; 6: 259.
33.
ShimadaHDoiTTsutsumimotoK, et al.Elevated risk of dementia diagnosis in older adults with low frequencies and durations of social conversation. J Alzheimers Dis2024; 98: 659–669.
34.
Committee report: glycemic targets for elderly patients with diabetes: Japan diabetes society (JDS)/Japan geriatrics society (JGS) joint committee on improving care for elderly patients with diabetes. J Diabetes Investig2017; 8: 126–128.
35.
UmemuraSArimaHArimaS, et al.The Japanese society of hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2019). Hypertens Res2019; 42: 1235–1481.
36.
KinoshitaMYokoteKAraiH, et al.Japan Atherosclerosis society (JAS) guidelines for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases 2017. J Atheroscler Thromb2018; 25: 846–984.
37.
FujiwaraYSuzukiHYasunagaM, et al.Brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment in older Japanese: validation of the Japanese version of the Montreal cognitive assessment. Geriatr Gerontol Int2010; 10: 225–232.
38.
WeinerBJLewisCCStanickC, et al.Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci2017; 12: 108.
39.
CarrollCPattersonMWoodS, et al.A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci2007; 2: 40.
40.
MorleyJEMalmstromTKMillerDK. A simple frailty questionnaire (frail) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans. J Nutr Health Aging2012; 16: 601–608.
41.
ProchaskaJOVelicerWF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot1997; 12: 38–48.
42.
OtaniS. Step for coding and theorization. Kansei Eng J2010; 10: 155.
AbbeyMBartholomewLKNonvignonJ, et al.Factors related to retention of community health workers in a trial on community-based management of fever in children under 5 years in the Dangme West District of Ghana. Int Health2014; 6: 99–105.
45.
Devereux-FitzgeraldAPowellRDewhurstA, et al.The acceptability of physical activity interventions to older adults: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Soc Sci Med2016; 158: 14–23.
46.
BaileySCWismerGAParkerRM, et al.Development and rationale for a multifactorial, randomized controlled trial to test strategies to promote adherence to complex drug regimens among older adults. Contemp Clin Trials2017; 62: 21–26.
47.
CorryDASDohertyJCarterG, et al.Acceptability of a nurse-led, person-centred, anticipatory care planning intervention for older people at risk of functional decline: a qualitative study. PLoS One2021; 16: e0251978.
48.
VidovichMRLautenschlagerNTFlickerL, et al.Treatment fidelity and acceptability of a cognition-focused intervention for older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Int Psychogeriatr2013; 25: 815–823.
49.
Tai-SealeMElwynGWilsonCJ, et al.Enhancing shared decision making through carefully designed interventions that target patient and provider behavior. Health Aff (Millwood)2016; 35: 605–612.
50.
SekhonMCartwrightMFrancisJJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res2017; 17: 88.
51.
NkimbengMCottonQParkerL. Culturally responsive interventions for older adults: from development to adaptation. Innov Aging2023; 7: 307–307.
52.
CohenGDPerlsteinSChaplineJ, et al.The impact of professionally conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health, and social functioning of older adults. Gerontologist2006; 46: 726–734.
53.
GagliardiAR. Tailoring interventions: examining the evidence and identifying gaps. J Contin Educ Health Prof2011; 31: 276–282.
54.
NgTPFengLNyuntMSZ, et al.Nutritional, physical, cognitive, and combination interventions and frailty reversal among older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med2015; 128: 1225–1236. e1.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
