Recent studies have revealed disrupted dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) in stroke or dementia brains. However, it remains unclear how the dFNC was altered in post-stroke dementia (PSD).
Objective
This study aimed to explore PSD-specific alterations in the dFNC and their association with clinical assessments.
Methods
We included 19 normal controls (NC), 16 PSD, and 20 post-stroke non-dementia (PSND) patients who underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scan. Independent component analysis, combined with a sliding-window approach, was employed to calculate dFNC. The cognitive performance was assessed by both Mini-Mental State Examination and MiniCog assessments, which were subsequently used for multiple regression analysis to investigate the relationships with dFNC.
Results
We identified 13 meaningful resting-state networks, and the dFNC among them derived four states exhibiting different connection patterns. In state III with strong connections within high-order networks, PSD and PSND both showed increased connectivity between visual network (VN) and high-order networks relative to NC; in state I with weak connections among all networks, PSD showed weaker connectivity between default mode network (DMN) and executive control network and between VN and DMN compared to PSND. Moreover, the dFNC measures showed significant correlations with cognitive assessments of patients.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that PSD-specific functional network connectivity (FNC) alterations are state-dependent, and dFNC reveals a coexistence mechanism of functional impairment and compensation in large-scale brain networks, which is not observed in static FNC. This offers a new perspective to understand the neural mechanisms of PSD.
KimKYShinKYChangKA. Potential biomarkers for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci2022; 23: 602.
2.
FeiginVLStarkBAJohnsonCO, et al.Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol2021; 20: 795–820.
3.
MijajlovićMDPavlovićABraininM, et al.Post-stroke dementia – a comprehensive review. BMC Med2017; 15: 11.
4.
PengCYChenYCCuiY, et al.Regional coherence alterations revealed by resting-state fMRI in post-stroke patients with cognitive dysfunction. PLoS One2016; 11: e0159574.
5.
YaoGLiJLiuS, et al.Alterations of functional connectivity in stroke patients with basal ganglia damage and cognitive impairment. Front Neurol2020; 11: 980.
6.
ZhaoZCaiHZhengW, et al.Atrophic pattern of hippocampal subfields in post-stroke demented patient. J Alzheimers Dis2021; 80: 1299–1309.
7.
ZhaoZCaiHHuangM, et al.Altered functional connectivity of hippocampal subfields in poststroke dementia. J Magn Reson Imaging2021; 54: 1337–1348.
8.
CaiHZhaoZNiL, et al.Structural and functional deficits in patients with poststroke dementia: a multimodal MRI study. Neural Plast2021; 2021: 3536234.
9.
LoCYZSuTWHuangCC, et al.Randomization and resilience of brain functional networks as systems-level endophenotypes of schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2015; 112: 9123–9128.
10.
StamCJ. Modern network science of neurological disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci2014; 15: 683–695.
11.
ZouYZhaoZYinD, et al.Brain anomaly networks uncover heterogeneous functional reorganization patterns after stroke. Neuroimage Clin2018; 20: 523–530.
12.
HuQLiYWuY, et al.Brain network hierarchy reorganization in Alzheimer’s disease: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Hum Brain Mapp2022; 43: 3498–3507.
13.
NgASLWangJNgKK, et al.Distinct network topology in Alzheimer’s disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimers Res Ther2021; 13: 13.
14.
WangYWangCWeiY, et al.Abnormal functional connectivities patterns of multidomain cognitive impairments in pontine stroke patients. Hum Brain Mapp2022; 43: 4676–4688.
15.
RaoBWangSYuM, et al.Suboptimal states and frontoparietal network-centered incomplete compensation revealed by dynamic functional network connectivity in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment. Front Aging Neurosci2022; 14: 893297.
16.
YueXLiZLiY, et al.Altered static and dynamic functional network connectivity in post-stroke cognitive impairment. Neurosci Lett2023; 799: 137097.
17.
NomiJSFarrantKDamarajuE, et al.Dynamic functional network connectivity reveals unique and overlapping profiles of insula subdivisions. Hum Brain Mapp2016; 37: 1770–1787.
18.
FuZCaprihanAChenJ, et al.Altered static and dynamic functional network connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease and subcortical ischemic vascular disease: shared and specific brain connectivity abnormalities. Hum Brain Mapp2019; 40: 3203–3221.
19.
FiorenzatoEStrafellaAPKimJ, et al.Dynamic functional connectivity changes associated with dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Brain2019; 142: 2860–2872.
20.
BonkhoffAKEspinozaFAGazulaH, et al.Acute ischaemic stroke alters the brain’s preference for distinct dynamic connectivity states. Brain2020; 143: 1525–1540.
21.
WangYWangCMiaoP, et al.An imbalance between functional segregation and integration in patients with pontine stroke: a dynamic functional network connectivity study. Neuroimage Clin2020; 28: 102507.
22.
Cognitive Impairment Committee of Neurology Branch, Chinese Medical Association and Writing Group of Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Vascular Cognitive Impairment. Chinese Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of vascular cognitive impairment. Natl Med J China2019; 99: 2737–2744.
23.
HongWLiuZZhangX, et al.Distance-related functional reorganization predicts motor outcome in stroke patients. BMC Med2024; 22: 247.
24.
QiuWKuangHTelegE, et al.Machine learning for detecting early infarction in acute stroke with non–contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology2020; 294: 638–644.
25.
HimbergJHyvärinenAEspositoF. Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization. Neuroimage2004; 22: 1214–1222.
26.
GriffantiLDouaudGBijsterboschJ, et al.Hand classification of fMRI ICA noise components. Neuroimage2017; 154: 188–205.
27.
SmithSMFoxPTMillerKL, et al.Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2009; 106: 13040–13045.
28.
HutchisonRMWomelsdorfTAllenEA, et al.Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage2013; 80: 360–378.
29.
FuZDuYCalhounVD. The dynamic functional network connectivity analysis framework. Eng Beijing China2019; 5: 190–193.
30.
CuiQShengWChenY, et al.Dynamic changes of amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. Hum Brain Mapp2020; 41: 1667–1676.
31.
AllenEADamarajuEPlisSM, et al.Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cereb Cortex2014; 24: 663–676.
32.
DamarajuEAllenEABelgerA, et al.Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia. Neuroimage Clin2014; 5: 298–308.
33.
FriedmanJHastieTTibshiraniR. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics2008; 9: 432–441.
34.
VaroquauxGGramfortAPolineJ, et al.Brain covariance selection: better individual functional connectivity models using population prior. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on neural information processing systems - volume 2, Vancouver, British Colubmia, Canada, 2010, pp.2334–2342. New York: Curran Associates, Inc.
35.
WuLWangCLiuJ, et al.Voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity associated with change of cognitive function in chronic pontine stroke. Front Aging Neurosci2021; 13: 621767.
36.
LiuFChenCHongW, et al.Selectively disrupted sensorimotor circuits in chronic stroke with hand dysfunction. CNS Neurosci Ther2022; 28: 677–689.
37.
ZhangJChangY. Alterations of static and dynamic functional network connectivity in acute ischemic brainstem stroke. Acta Radiol2023; 64: 1623–1630.
38.
LuLZhangJLiF, et al.Aberrant static and dynamic functional network connectivity in acute mild traumatic brain injury with cognitive impairment. Clin Neuroradiol2022; 32: 205–214.
39.
MoguilnerSGarcíaAMPerlYS, et al.Dynamic brain fluctuations outperform connectivity measures and mirror pathophysiological profiles across dementia subtypes: a multicenter study. Neuroimage2021; 225: 117522.
40.
NijboerTCBumaFEWintersC, et al.No changes in functional connectivity during motor recovery beyond 5 weeks after stroke; A longitudinal resting-state fMRI study. PLoS One2017; 12: e0178017.
41.
Dacosta AguayoRGrañaMIturria MedinaY, et al.Impairment of functional integration of the default mode network correlates with cognitive outcome at three months after stroke. Hum Brain Mapp2015; 36: 577–590.
42.
JiangLGengWChenH, et al.Decreased functional connectivity within the default-mode network in acute brainstem ischemic stroke. Eur J Radiol2018; 105: 221–226.
43.
CaiSChongTPengY, et al.Altered functional brain networks in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a resting-state fMRI study. Brain Imaging Behav2017; 11: 619–631.
44.
UddinLQClare KellyAMBiswalBB, et al.Functional connectivity of default mode network components: correlation, anticorrelation, and causality. Hum Brain Mapp2009; 30: 625–637.
45.
DuYFuZSuiJ, et al.Neuromark: an automated and adaptive ICA based pipeline to identify reproducible fMRI markers of brain disorders. Neuroimage Clin2020; 28: 102375.
46.
LeeDHLeePSeoSW, et al.Neural substrates of cognitive reserve in Alzheimer’s disease spectrum and normal aging. Neuroimage2019; 186: 690–702.
47.
DautricourtSGonneaudJLandeauB, et al.Dynamic functional connectivity patterns associated with dementia risk. Alzheimers Res Ther2022; 14: 72.
48.
Van Den HeuvelMPHulshoff PolHE. Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol2010; 20: 519–534.
49.
MasonMFNortonMIVan HornJD, et al.Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science2007; 315: 393–395.
50.
GusnardDARaichleME. Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat Rev Neurosci2001; 2: 685–694.
51.
TagliazucchiEBalenzuelaPFraimanD, et al.Criticality in large-scale brain fMRI dynamics unveiled by a novel point process analysis. Front Physiol2012; 3: 15.
52.
CifreIMiller FloresMTPenalbaL, et al.Revisiting nonlinear functional brain co-activations: directed, dynamic, and delayed. Front Neurosci2021; 15: 700171.
53.
Penalba SánchezLOliveira SilvaPSumichAL, et al.Increased functional connectivity patterns in mild Alzheimer’s disease: a rsfMRI study. Front Aging Neurosci2023; 14: 1037347.
54.
KeilholzSCaballero GaudesCBandettiniP, et al.Time-resolved resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis: current status, challenges, and new directions. Brain Connect2017; 7: 465–481.
55.
TagliazucchiESiniatchkinMLaufsH, et al.The voxel-wise functional connectome can be efficiently derived from co-activations in a sparse spatio-temporal point-process. Front Neurosci2016; 10: 381.
