It is known that eyes-open (EO) and eyes-closed (EC) conditions invoke different organizations of brain functional networks, such as sensorimotor, attention, and salience networks in healthy participants. Functional connectivity (FC) extracted from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data, under either EO or EC conditions, has been widely applied to explore the neural substrates of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the impact of eye conditions on FC within the AD continuum remains not fully understood.
Objective
This study aims to investigate the effects of eye conditions on FC across the AD continuum.
Methods
FC with the primary visual cortex (V1) seed was analyzed for both EO and EC conditions in 59 amyloid-β (Aβ)-positron emission tomography (PET)-negative cognitively normal (CN−), 14 Aβ-PET-positive CN+, 24 mild cognitive impairment (MCI+), and 15 AD individuals.
Results
EO and EC differently modulated FC between the V1 and cerebellum, especially the posterior vermis, in all groups. In CN−, CN+, and MCI+ groups, EO significantly facilitated FC between V1 and the cerebellum compared with the EC condition. However, the AD group showed the reverse pattern. Moreover, a sub-analysis demonstrated that the FC significantly correlated with a truncal balance measure under EO, but not EC, in participants with MCI+ and AD.
Conclusions
The results show that the FC between the V1 and cerebellum changed in AD. This finding may partially explain the impaired truncal balance and tendency to fall down in AD. This study suggests that analyzing FC under EO and EC conditions may provide a new functional biomarker for AD.
HeddenTVan DijkKRBeckerJA, et al.Disruption of functional connectivity in clinically normal older adults harboring amyloid burden. J Neurosci2009; 29: 12686–12694.
2.
JonesDTMachuldaMMVemuriP, et al.Age-related changes in the default mode network are more advanced in Alzheimer disease. Neurology2011; 77: 1524–1531.
3.
ShelineYIRaichleMESnyderAZ, et al.Amyloid plaques disrupt resting state default mode network connectivity in cognitively normal elderly. Biol Psychiatry2010; 67: 584–587.
4.
BalthazarMLde CamposBMFrancoAR, et al.Whole cortical and default mode network mean functional connectivity as potential biomarkers for mild Alzheimer's disease. Psychiatry Res2014; 221: 37–42.
5.
BinnewijzendMASchoonheimMMSanz-ArigitaE, et al.Resting-state fMRI changes in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging2012; 33: 2018–2028.
6.
PalmqvistSSchollMStrandbergO, et al.Earliest accumulation of beta-amyloid occurs within the default-mode network and concurrently affects brain connectivity. Nat Commun2017; 8: 1214.
7.
WeilerMTeixeiraCVNogueiraMH, et al.Differences and the relationship in default mode network intrinsic activity and functional connectivity in mild Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Brain Connect2014; 4: 567–574.
8.
JaoTVertesPEAlexander-BlochAF, et al.Volitional eyes opening perturbs brain dynamics and functional connectivity regardless of light input. Neuroimage2013; 69: 21–34.
9.
XuPHuangRWangJ, et al.Different topological organization of human brain functional networks with eyes open versus eyes closed. Neuroimage2014; 90: 246–255.
10.
ZhangDLiangBWuX, et al.Directionality of large-scale resting-state brain networks during eyes open and eyes closed conditions. Front Hum Neurosci2015; 9: 81.
11.
LiangBZhangDWenX, et al.Brain spontaneous fluctuations in sensorimotor regions were directly related to eyes open and eyes closed: evidences from a machine learning approach. Front Hum Neurosci2014; 8: 45.
12.
CostumeroVBueichekuEAdrian-VenturaJ, et al.Opening or closing eyes at rest modulates the functional connectivity of V1 with default and salience networks. Sci Rep2020; 10: 9137.
13.
RiedlVBienkowskaKStrobelC, et al.Local activity determines functional connectivity in the resting human brain: a simultaneous FDG-PET/fMRI study. J Neurosci2014; 34: 6260–6266.
14.
HayLBardCFleuryM, et al.Availability of visual and proprioceptive afferent messages and postural control in elderly adults. Exp Brain Res1996; 108: 129–139.
15.
JudgeJOKingMBWhippleR, et al.Dynamic balance in older persons: effects of reduced visual and proprioceptive input. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci1995; 50: M263–M270.
16.
ManchesterDWoollacottMZederbauer-HyltonN, et al.Visual, vestibular and somatosensory contributions to balance control in the older adult. J Gerontol1989; 44: M118–M127.
17.
PerrySDSantosLCPatlaAE. Contribution of vision and cutaneous sensation to the control of centre of mass (COM) during gait termination. Brain Res2001; 913: 27–34.
18.
OsobaMYRaoAKAgrawalSK, et al.Balance and gait in the elderly: a contemporary review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol2019; 4: 143–153.
19.
DipoppaMRansonAKruminM, et al.Vision and locomotion shape the interactions between neuron types in mouse visual cortex. Neuron2018; 98: 602–615.e8.
20.
Di MarcoSFattoriPGalatiG, et al.Preference for locomotion-compatible curved paths and forward direction of self-motion in somatomotor and visual areas. Cortex2021; 137: 74–92.
21.
FajenBR. Visual Control of Locomotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
22.
PatlaAE. Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion. Gait Posture1997; 5: 54–69.
23.
PriestHNCuttingJETorreyCC, et al.Visual flow and direction of locomotion. Science1985; 227: 1063–1064.
24.
SheridanPLSolomontJKowallN, et al.Influence of executive function on locomotor function: divided attention increases gait variability in Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc2003; 51: 1633–1637.
25.
TangenGGEngedalKBerglandA, et al.Relationships between balance and cognition in patients with subjective cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer disease. Phys Ther2014; 94: 1123–1134.
26.
VisserH. Gait and balance in senile dementia of Alzheimer's type. Age Ageing1983; 12: 296–301.
27.
PottorfTSNoceraJREicholtzSP, et al.Locomotor adaptation deficits in older individuals with cognitive impairments: a pilot study. Front Neurol2022; 13: 800338.
28.
FujitaKSugimotoTNomaH, et al.Postural control characteristics in Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and vascular dementia. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci2024; 79: glae061.
29.
NakamuraACuestaPKatoT, et al.Early functional network alterations in asymptomatic elders at risk for Alzheimer's disease. Sci Rep2017; 7: 6517.
30.
NakamuraAKanekoNVillemagneVL, et al.High performance plasma amyloid-beta biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. Nature2018; 554: 249–254.
31.
NakamuraACuestaPFernandezA, et al.Electromagnetic signatures of the preclinical and prodromal stages of Alzheimer's disease. Brain2018; 141: 1470–1485.
32.
NihashiTSakuraiKKatoT, et al.Patterns of distribution of 18F-THK5351 positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's disease continuum. J Alzheimers Dis2022; 85: 223–234.
33.
Tzourio-MazoyerNLandeauBPapathanassiouD, et al.Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage2002; 15: 273–289.
34.
KanekoNNakamuraAWashimiY, et al.Novel plasma biomarker surrogating cerebral amyloid deposition. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci2014; 90: 353–364.
35.
RabinoviciGDRosenHJAlkalayA, et al.Amyloid vs FDG-PET in the differential diagnosis of AD and FTLD. Neurology2011; 77: 2034–2042.
36.
YamashitaASakaiYYamadaT, et al.Generalizable brain network markers of major depressive disorder across multiple imaging sites. PLoS Biol2020; 18: e3000966.
37.
BehzadiYRestomKLiauJ, et al.A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. NeuroImage2007; 37: 90–101.
38.
PowerJDMitraALaumannTO, et al.Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage2014; 84: 320–341.
39.
BrettMAntonJLValabregueR, et al.Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. In: 8th International conference on functional mapping of the human brain, Sendai, Japan, 2–6 June 2002, p.497. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Orlando.
40.
HensonRPennyW. ANOVAs and SPM. London, UK: Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, 2005.
41.
DiedrichsenJ. A spatially unbiased atlas template of the human cerebellum. Neuroimage2006; 33: 127–138.
GhezCThachWT, et al.The cerebellum. In: KandelERSchwartzJHJessellTM (eds) Principles of neural science. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000, pp.833–852.
44.
YanagiharaD. Mechanisms of locomotor control in the cerebellum. Brain Nerve2010; 62: 1149–1156.
45.
MuzzuTMitoloSGavaGP, et al.Encoding of locomotion kinematics in the mouse cerebellum. PLoS One2018; 13: e0203900.
46.
CoffmanKADumRPStrickPL. Cerebellar vermis is a target of projections from the motor areas in the cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2011; 108: 16068–16073.
47.
la FougereCZwergalARomingerA, et al.Real versus imagined locomotion: a [18F]-FDG PET-fMRI comparison. Neuroimage2010; 50: 1589–1598.
48.
SMMBastianAJ. Relative contributions of balance and voluntary leg-coordination deficits to cerebellar gait ataxia. J Neurophysiol2003; 89: 1844–1856.
49.
SMMBastianAJ. Prism adaptation during walking generalizes to reaching and requires the cerebellum. J Neurophysiol2004; 92: 2497–2509.
50.
SMMBastianAJ. Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. Neuroscientist2004; 10: 247–259.
51.
SMMBastianAJ. Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking. J Neurosci2006; 26: 9107–9116.
52.
HintonDCThielASoucyJ-P, et al.Adjusting gait step-by-step: brain activation during split-belt treadmill walking. Neuroimage2019; 202: 116095.
53.
PisottaIMolinariM. Cerebellar contribution to feedforward control of locomotion. Front Hum Neurosci2014; 8: 75.
54.
ChalifJIMartinez-SilvaMLPagiazitisJG, et al.Control of mammalian locomotion by ventral spinocerebellar tract neurons. Cell2022; 185: 328–344.e26.
55.
ChangWPedroniAHohendorfV, et al.Functionally distinct Purkinje cell types show temporal precision in encoding locomotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2020; 117: 17330–17337.
56.
GrillnerSWallenPSaitohK, et al.Neural bases of goal-directed locomotion in vertebrates: an overview. Brain Res Rev2008; 57: 2–12.
57.
LeeAMHoyJLBonciA, et al.Identification of a brainstem circuit regulating visual cortical state in parallel with locomotion. Neuron2014; 83: 455–466.
58.
ChaudhariKWangLKruseJ, et al.Early loss of cerebellar Purkinje cells in human and a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurol Res2021; 43: 570–581.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
