This paper is concerned with computational aspects for inverse problems in engineering sciences. First, regularization techniques are discussed for ill-posedness of inverse problems. Secondly, computational methods are overviewed for iterative algorithms using the gradient evaluation of output least square errors. The final part of this paper is devoted to optimal search algorithm for inverse solvers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BambergerA., ChaventG. and LaillyP., About the stability of the inverse problem in ID wave equations - application to the interpretation of seismic profiles, J. Appl. Math. Optim.5 (1977), 1–47.
2.
SunaharaY. and AiharaS. and KojimaF., A method of parameter estimation for stochastic distributed parameter systems and its application to seismic profiles identification, in: Proc. 8th IFAC World Congress, Kyoto, 1981.
3.
IssacsonD., Distinguishability of conductivities by electrical current computed tomography, IEEE Trans. Medical imagingMI-5 (1986), 91–95.
4.
BanksH.T. and KojimaF., Boundary shape identification problems in two-dimensional domains related to thermal testing of materials, Quart. Appl. Math. 47 (1989), 273–293.
5.
BanksH.T., KojimaF. and WinfreeW.P., Boundary estimation problems arising in thermal tomography, Inverse Problems6 (1990), 897–921.
6.
TikhonovA. and ArsenineV., Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems, Wiley, New York, 1977.
7.
HansenP.C., Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve, SIAM Rev.34 (1992), 561–580.
8.
KojimaF., Robust analysis of boundary shape identification arising in thermal tomography, in: Lecture Notes in RIMS, No. 836, Kyoto University, 1993, pp. 78–87
9.
VogelC.R. and OmanM.E., Fast total variation-based image reconstruction, in: Proc. ASME 1995 Design Engineering Technical Conference, Vol. 84-3, ASME, New York, 1995, pp. 1009–1015
10.
RudinL.I., OsherS., and FatemiE., Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Physica D60 (1992), 259–268.
11.
ItoK. and KunischK., Nonsmooth optimization method for image restoration, in: Proc. ASME 1995 Design Engineering Technical Conference, Vol. 84-3, ASME, New York, 1995, pp. 1017–1021
12.
MarquardtD.W., An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 11 (1963), 431–441.
13.
PowellM.J.D., A hybrid method for nonlinear equations, in: Numerical Methods for Nonlinear Algebraic Equations, 1970.
14.
MoréJ.J., Recent developments in algorithms and software for trust region method, in: Mathematical Programming: The State of the Art, Springer NY, 1983.
15.
ItoK. and KlinischK., The augument Lagrangean method for parameter estimation in elliptic systems, SIAM J. Control and Optimization28 (1990), 113–136.
16.
JohanssonE.M., DowlaF.U. and GoodmanD.M., Backpropagation learning for multi-layer feed-forward neural networks using the conjugate gradient method, Technical Report UCRL-JC-104850, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, 1990.
17.
KojimaF., Back-propagation learning using the trust region algorithm and application to nondestructive testing in applied electromagnetics, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 4 (1993), 27–33.
18.
HollandJ.H., Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, Univ. of Michigan Press, 1975.
19.
GoldbergD.E., Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, 1989.
20.
IshiguroA., TanakaY. and UchikawaY., A study of genetic algorithm's application to inverse problems in electromagnetic fields, in: Nonlinear Phenomena in Electromagnetic Fields, Elsevier Studies in Applied Electromagnetics in Materials, Vol. 3, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 57–60
