The purpose of the current study is to reveal the effect of corrosion on seismic performance of a self-centering (SC) beam-to-column connection, and thus to provide guidance on durability design of such kind of connections. Accelerated corrosion test was first conducted on the energy dissipation components (dog-bone plates). Extra round bar coupons cut off from the plates were also tested considering the effect of corrosion, cyclic tests at structural member level were then carried out. The effect of the generation of rust layer on friction coefficient of plate surface was studied. Finite element (FE) model was built to predict the seismic behavior of the connection considering corrosion. On the basis of simulation results, the influence of friction coefficient on the seismic performance of the connection was analyzed. The experimental and numerical analysis show that the friction coefficient between the replaceable component and adjacent components increases after corrosion, and thus leads to increased load-carrying and energy dissipation capabilities of the SC connection, but the self-centering ability is compromised. When the friction coefficient is increased from 0.33 to 0.8, the increase of equivalent yield force, equivalent yield displacement, peak load, initial stiffness, cumulative energy dissipation, and residual deformation are 2.71%, 0.26%, 3.12%, 7.28%, 6.88%, 14.52%, respectively.
BruneauMChangSEEguchiRT, et al. (2003) A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra19(4): 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497
2.
CaiXMengS (2018) Research on restoring force model of the prestressed self-centering concrete frame joints. Engineering Mechanics35(1): 182–190.
3.
CaiXMengSSunW (2012) Experimental study on behaviors of beam-column connections for self-centering post-tensioned precast frame. China Civil Engineering Journal45(12): 29–37.
4.
CaiXMengSSunW (2014) Experimental study on performance of components of the exterior self-centering post-tensioned precast connections. Engineering Mechanics31(3): 160–167.
ChabocheJL (1989) Constitutive equations for cyclic plasticity and cyclic viscoplasticity. International Journal of Plasticity5(3): 247–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(89)90015-6
ChabocheJLRousselierG (1983) On the Plastic and Viscoplastic Constitutive equations—Part I: Rules Developed with Internal Variable Concept. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology105(2): 153–158.
9.
ChenJFangCWangW, et al. (2020) Variable-friction self-centering energy-dissipation braces (VF-SCEDBs) with NiTi SMA cables for seismic resilience. Journal of Constructional Steel Research175: 106318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106318
10.
ChenJWangWFangC (2021) Probabilistic seismic evaluation of SMA-based self-centering braced structures considering uncertainty of regional temperature. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics50(13): 3357–3378. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3513
ChenJWangWFangC (2023) Risk-targeted seismic design for collapse safety of SMA-based structures considering temperature effect. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics52(13): 4082–4103. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3858
13.
ChenZ-PZhangLHuangJ, et al. (2025a) High-performance SMA-based self-centring precast segmental concrete column: design concept, test and simulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics54(2): 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4275
14.
ChenZ-PZhangLHuangJ, et al. (2025b) High-performance SMA-based self-centring precast segmental concrete column: design concept, test and simulation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics54(2): 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4275
15.
ChristopoulosCAndreFUangC-M, et al. (2002a) Posttensioned energy dissipating connections for moment-resisting steel frames. Journal of Structural Engineering128(9): 1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:9(1111)
16.
ChristopoulosCAndréFFolzB (2002b) Seismic response of self-centring hysteretic SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics31(5): 1131–1150.
17.
ChristopoulosCTremblayRKimH-J, et al. (2008) Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: development and validation. Journal of Structural Engineering134(1): 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2008)134:1(96)
18.
ChuGWangWZhangY (2020) Nonlinear seismic performance of beam-through steel frames with self-centering modular panel and replaceable hysteretic dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research170: 106091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106091
19.
ChuGWangWZhangY (2021) Shake-table testing of 2-story steel framed building with self-centering modular panels and slit steel plate walls. Engineering Structures247: 113232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113232
20.
ChuGWangWZhangY (2022) Quantification of seismic performance factors of beam-through steel frames with self-centering modular panel and replaceable hysteretic dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research189(October 2021): 107059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.107059
21.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (2005) EN 1993-1-8: Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – Part 1-8: Design of joints. Brussels: CEN.
22.
FangC (2022) SMAs for infrastructures in seismic zones: a critical review of latest trends and future needs. Journal of Building Engineering57: 104918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104918
23.
FangCZhengYChenJ, et al. (2019) Superelastic NiTi SMA cables: thermal-mechanical behavior, hysteretic modelling and seismic application. Engineering Structures183(January): 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.049
24.
FangCPingYChenY, et al. (2022) Seismic performance of self-centering steel frames with SMA-viscoelastic hybrid braces seismic performance of self-centering steel frames with. Journal of Earthquake Engineering26(10): 5004–5031. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1856233
HuSAlamMSZhangY, et al. (2024) Partially self-centering braces with NiTi- and Fe-SMA U-shaped dampers. Thin-Walled Structures197(August 2023): 111605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2024.111605
29.
JGJ 82-2011: Technical Specification for High Strength Bolt Connections of Steel Structures (2011) Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
30.
KennedyJEberhartR (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN’95-international conference on neural networks1995: 1942–1948.
31.
LalwaniSSinghalSKumarR, et al. (2013) A comprehensive survey: applications of multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm. Transactions on Combinatorics2: 39–101.
32.
LiJWangW (2018) Structural design and seismic performance evaluation of a new type of prefabricated self resetting energy dissipating steel frame. In: Proceedings of the 16th Academic Exchange Conference and Teaching Seminar of theStructural Stability and Fatigue Branch of the China Steel Structure Association(ISSF-2018),Beijing: China Steel Structure Association, pp. 464–469.
33.
LouTWangW (2022) Post-fire seismic behaviour of a self-centring connection with buckling-restrained plates and pre-stressed bars. Engineering Structures269: 114814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114814
34.
LouTWangWLiJ (2022) Post-earthquake fire behaviour of a self-centring connection with buckling-restrained plates and pre-stressed bars: an experimental investigation. Journal of Building Engineering56: 104733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104733
35.
LouTWangWLiJ (2023a) Seismic behaviour of a self-centring steel connection with replaceable energy-dissipation components. Engineering Structures274: 115204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115204
36.
LouTWangWIzzuddinBA (2023b) System-level analysis of a self-centring moment-resisting frame under post-earthquake fire. Engineering Structures289: 116294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116294
37.
LuXSunW (2024) Study on seismic response and vulnerability of concrete frames with frictional self-centering joints. Engineering Mechanics. Epub ahead of print 21 March 2024. Available at:https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.12.0902
38.
LüXZhouYChenC (2014) Research progress on innovative earthquake-resilient structural systems (in Chinese). Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics01(4): 130–139.
39.
LüXQuanLJiangH (2017) Research trend of earthquake resilient structures seen from 16WCEE (in Chinese). Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics37(3): 1–9.
RiclesJMSauseRPengSW, et al. (2002) Experimental evaluation of earthquake resistant posttensioned steel connections. Journal of Structural Engineering128(7): 850–859. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:7(850)
42.
SmithCKanvindeADeierleinG (2017) Calibration of continuum cyclic constitutive models for structural steel using particle swarm optimization. Journal of Engineering Mechanics143(5): 4017012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001214
43.
VoceE (1948) The relationship between stress and strain for homogeneous deformation. Journal of the Institute of Metals74: 537–562.
44.
WangY (2021) Study on 3D Cyclic Constitutive Model and Ductile Fracture Criterion of High Strength Steels. Tongji University.
45.
WangBZhuS (2018) Superelastic SMA U-shaped dampers with self-centering functions. Smart Materials and Structures27(5): 55003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/aab52d
46.
WangWDuXZhangY, et al. (2017) Experimental investigation of beam-through steel frames with self-centering modular panels. Journal of Structural Engineering143(5): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001743
47.
WangBZhuSCasciatiF, et al. (2021) Cyclic behavior and deformation mechanism of superelastic SMA U-shaped dampers under in-plane and out-of-plane loadings. Smart Materials and Structures30(5): 55009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/abedf4
48.
WangCAyyubBMAhmedA (2022a) Time-dependent reliability and resilience of aging structures exposed to multiple hazards in a changing environment. Resilient Cities and Structures1(3): 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2022.10.001
49.
WangHJWangXQZhuQP, et al. (2022b) Multi-objective optimization of ultrasonic rolling extrusion process parameters based on simulated annealing. Journal of Plasticity Engineering29(04): 14–22.
50.
XiaoHYangWSZhangWJ, et al. (2022) Aerodynamic optimization design of wind turbine blades based on multi objective optimization algorithm. Ship Engineering44(S2): 46–50.
51.
YangCLiYZhengL, et al. (2019) Optimum of electromagnetic active suspension actuator using multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm. Journal of Mechanical Engineering55(19): 154–166.
52.
YaoZWangW (2022) Full-range strain-hardening behavior of structural steels: experimental identification and numerical simulation. Journal of Constructional Steel Research194(May): 107329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107329
ZhangYFangCWangW (2022a) Experimental and numerical study on cyclic behavior of corroded. Journal of Constructional Steel Research196(June): 107369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107369
55.
ZhangYAyyubBMFungJF (2022b) Projections of corrosion and deterioration of infrastructure in United States coasts under a changing climate. Resilient Cities and Structures1(1): 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2022.04.004
56.
ZhangYFangCWangW, et al. (2023) Cyclic plasticity and ULCF behavior of steel butt-joints considering different welding methods. International Journal of Fatigue173(March): 107684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107684
57.
ZhangYWangHWangW (2024) A method to calculate seismic behavior of a corroded beam-to-column joint considering distribution randomness of corrosion depth. Journal of Constructional Steel Research212(August 2023): 108267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108267
