To develop a design method for the shear capacity of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) encased steel beams, shear tests were conducted on nine beam specimens. The key parameters investigated were the shear span ratio, stirrup ratio, and the thickness of the steel web. Based on the experimental results, a finite element (FE) model of the beam was established to further analyze failure modes and shear mechanisms. Using both experimental data and extensive FE simulations, two predictive formulae for the shear capacity of UHPC encased steel beams was proposed. The tests showed that the shear-compressive failure occurred in all the beam specimens. The vertical peak load dropped by 15.5% when the shear span ratio increased from 1.04 to 2.46. Conversely, the vertical peak load of the beam specimens increased with the increase of the stirrup ratio and the steel web thickness. The average ratios of the two prediction formulas to the experimental values are 0.89 and 0.92 respectively, and the average ratios of the two prediction formulas to the finite element calculation values are also 0.96 and 0.95 respectively, indicating that the proposed prediction formulae for the shear capacity of the UHPC encased steel beam are reasonable and slightly conservative. The findings of this investigation provide experimental and theoretical support for the shear design of the UHPC encased steel beams.
AbadelAAbbasHAlmusallamT, et al. (2022) Experimental study of shear behavior of CFRP strengthened ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete deep beams. Case Studies in Construction Materials16: e01103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01103
2.
AhmadSBahijSAl-OstaMA, et al. (2019) Shear behavior of ultra-high-performance concrete beams reinforced with high-strength steel bars. ACI Structural Journal116(4): 3–14.
3.
ChenBCZhouJLZhangD, et al. (2022) Experimental study on shear performances of ultra-high performance concrete deep beams. Structures39: 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.019
4.
ChenBCZhouJLZhangD, et al. (2023) Shear performances of reinforced ultra-high performance concrete short beams. Engineering Structures277: 115407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115407
5.
DengMKMaFDWangXS, et al. (2020) Investigation on the shear behavior of steel reinforced NC/HDC continuous deep beam. Structures23: 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.10.002
6.
FakehMJawdhariAFamA (2025) Recommended concrete damage plasticity parameters and constitutive models for UHPC in ABAQUS. Engineering Structures333: 120154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120154
7.
General Administration of Quality Supervision (2015) Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China Reactive Powder Concrete (GB/T 31387–2015). Beijing: China Standard Press.
HaoNYangYXueYC, et al. (2025) Shear performance of deep partially precast high-strength steel reinforced UHPC T-beam: experimental study and a novel shear model. Engineering Structures323: 119256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119256
10.
Hunan Provincial Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (2017) Technical Specification for Reactive Powder Concrete Structures (DBJ43/T 325-2017). Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
LimWYHongSG (2016) Shear tests for ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) beams with shear reinforcement. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials10(2): 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0145-8
13.
Ministry of Urban and Rural Development of People's Republic of China (2014) Concrete Structure Design Code (GB50010-2010). Beijing: China Building Industry Press.
14.
Ministry of Urban and Rural Development of People's Republic of China (2016) Composite Structure Technical Specification (JGJ 138-2016). Beijing: China Building Industry Press.
15.
Ministry of Urban and Rural Development of People's Republic of China (2019a) Standard for Design of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Structures (JGJ/T465-2019). Beijing: China building industry press.
16.
Ministry of Urban and Rural Development of People's Republic of China (2019b) Standard for Test Methods of Concrete Physical and Mechanical Properties (GB/T50081-2019). Beijing: China building industry press.
NadirWAliAYJawdhariA, et al. (2024b) Cyclic behavior of UHPC corner beam-column joints under bi-directional bending. Structures60: 105857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105857
19.
PanZFZhengWXiaoJZ, et al. (2022) Shear behavior of steel reinforced recycled aggregate concrete beams after exposure to elevated temperatures. Journal of Building Engineering48: 103953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103953
20.
RidhaMMSSarsamKFAl-ShaarbafIAS (2018) Experimental study and shear strength prediction for reactive powder concrete beams. Case Studies in Construction Materials8: 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2018.03.002
State Administration for Market Regulation of the People's Republic of China (2021) Metallic Materials -Tensile Testing - Part 1: Method of Test at Room Temperature (GB/T 228.1-2021)Beijing: China building industry press, 2019. Beijing: China Standards Press.
VooYLFosterSJGilbertRI (2006) Shear strength of fiber reinforced reactive powder concrete prestressed girders without stirrups. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology4(1): 123–132. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.4.123
25.
WangQSongHLLuCL, et al. (2020) Shear performance of reinforced ultra-high performance concrete rectangular section beams. Structures27: 1184–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.036
26.
XueYCShangCXYangY, et al. (2022) Shear strength prediction for concrete encased steel short columns: calibration based on current design codes. Journal of Building Engineering45: 103626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103626
27.
XueYCChenYQShangCX, et al. (2023a) Maximum shear strength of concrete-encased steel composite beams: a novel strength model and FE verification. Engineering Structures291: 116490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116490
28.
XueYCZhangXShangCX, et al. (2023b) Shear strength model for steel shape-reinforced concrete girders considering compatible steel–concrete interaction. Structures56: 104976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.104976
29.
YaoDLJiaJQWuF, et al. (2014) Shear performance of prestressed ultra high strength concrete encased steel beams. Construction and Building Materials52: 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.006
30.
YeMLiLFPeiBD, et al. (2023) Shear behavior of externally prestressed ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) T-beams without stirrups. Engineering Structures288: 116217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116217
ZhangRSWangTMChenJJ (2000) Mechanics of Materials. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
33.
ZhangLFZhangMWangK, et al. (2022) Axial compressive behavior of steel-reinforced reactive powder concrete short columns. Structures46: 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.10.073
34.
ZhangLFWangKZhangM, et al. (2023a) Seismic performance of steel-reinforced reactive powder concrete columns. Structures54: 1788–1802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.100
35.
ZhangLFWangKLingZB, et al. (2023b) Bond-slip behavior between reactive powder concrete and H-shaped steel. Journal of Constructional Steel Research210: 108058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108058
36.
ZhengWZLiLLuSS (2011) Experimental research on mechanical performance of normal section of reinforced reactive powder concrete beam. Journal of Building Structures32(6): 125–134, (in Chinese).
37.
ZhuZYWeiLWangK, et al. (2025) Experimental and numerical investigation of the seismic performance of steel-reinforced ultra-high performance concrete beams. Structures76: 108883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108883
