Shape memory alloys (SMAs), characterized by their superelasticity and self-centering capabilities, offer significant potential for applications in earthquake resistant structures. Accurate modeling of the hysteretic behavior of SMA materials is crucial for evaluating the seismic performance of self-centering structures installed with SMAs. However, currently in most numerical simulations conducted using OpenSees, the influences of cyclic damage to SMAs, including strength degradation, stiffness deterioration, and residual deformation accumulation, are commonly ignored, which is likely to cause significant discrepancies between the real structural performance and simulation results. In this study, an Improved SelfCentering Material (ISCM) model that incorporates the effects of cyclic damage to SMAs is developed and implemented in OpenSees through secondary development. The accuracy of the ISCM model is validated through numerical simulations of SMA specimens under three representative experiments, as well as three types of self-centering structural members installed with SMAs. The simulation results demonstrate that the ISCM model can accurately capture the hysteretic damage characteristics of SMAs under various loading conditions. It can be used to predict the seismic performance of the self-centering structural members installed with SMAs with better accuracy than by using the traditional SelfCentering (SC) model.
AsgarianBMoradiS (2011) Seismic response of steel braced frames with shape memory alloy braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research67(1): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.06.006
3.
AuricchioFTaylorRL (1997) Shape-memory alloys: modelling and numerical simulations of the finite-strain superelastic behavior. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering143(1–2): 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01147-4
4.
BallJMJamesRD (1987) Fine phase mixtures as minimizers of energy. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis100(1): 13–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00281246
5.
BrinsonLC (1993) One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape memory alloys: thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures4(2): 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X9300400213
6.
CasciatiFFaravelliL (2009) A passive control device with SMA components: from the prototype to the model. Structural Control and Health Monitoring16(7–8): 751–765. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.328
7.
ChristopoulosCTremblayRKimHJ, et al. (2008) Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: development and validation. Journal of Structural Engineering134(1): 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(96)
8.
DavarniaDChengSHVan EngelenN (2023) Effect of training on the cyclic behaviour of SMA wire. Smart Materials and Structures32(8): 085013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ace143
9.
DawMSBaskesMI (1984) Embedded-atom method: derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals. Physical Review B29(12): 6443–6453. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443
DongHHDuXLHanQ (2019) Seismic responses of steel frame structures with self-centering energy dissipation braced on shape memory alloy cables. Advances in Structural Engineering22(9): 2136–2148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219834752
GastienRCorbellaniCESadeM, et al. (2005) Thermal and pseudoelastic cycling in Cu–14.1Al–4.2Ni (Wt%) single crystals. Acta Materialia53(6): 1685–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.018
15.
Mohd JaniJLearyMSubicA, et al. (2014) A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Materials & Design (1980-2015)56: 1078–1113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084
LiYZhangHXWangJB, et al. (2023) Experimental investigation on the seismic behavior of a novel self-centering friction damper. Journal of Building Engineering76: 107384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107384
18.
LiangC (1990) The Constitutive Modeling of Shape Memory Alloys. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
19.
LiuJLZhuSYXuYL, et al. (2011) Displacement-based design approach for highway bridges with SMA isolators. Smart Structures and Systems8(2): 173–190. https://doi.org/10.12989/SSS.2011.8.2.173
20.
LiuJLChenCLinJQ, et al. (2024) A new constitutive model of shape memory alloy and its seismic mitigation capacity compared with existing models. Advances in Structural Engineering27(5): 835–853. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332241237580
21.
MillerDJFahnestockLAEathertonMR (2012) Development and experimental validation of a nickel–titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace. Engineering Structures40: 288–298. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037
22.
QianHKangLPLiZG, et al. (2024) Hysteretic behavior of self-centering shear wall incorporating superelastic shape memory alloy bars and engineered cementitious composites subjected to cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering150(9): 04024119. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12559
23.
SantoshSSampathVMouliswarRR (2022) Hot deformation characteristics of NiTiV shape memory alloy and modeling using constitutive equations and artificial neural networks. Journal of Alloys and Compounds901: 163451. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163451
24.
SongDKangGZKanQH, et al. (2014) Non-proportional multiaxial transformation ratchetting of super-elastic NiTi shape memory alloy: experimental observations. Mechanics of Materials70: 94–105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.12.003
25.
TanakaKNagakiS (1982) A thermomechanical description of materials with internal variables in the process of phase transitions. Ingenieur-Archiv51(5): 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00536655
26.
WangBZhuSY (2018) Cyclic tension–compression behavior of superelastic shape memory alloy bars with buckling-restrained devices. Construction and Building Materials186: 103–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.047
27.
WangXMXuBXYueZF (2008) Micromechanical modelling of the effect of plastic deformation on the mechanical behaviour in pseudoelastic shape memory alloys. International Journal of Plasticity24(8): 1307–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.09.006
28.
WangWFangCLiuJ (2016) Large size superelastic SMA bars: heat treatment strategy, mechanical property and seismic application. Smart Materials and Structures25(7): 075001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/075001
29.
WangSYZhanLBruhnsOT, et al. (2022) Accurately and automatically simulating hysteresis loops of shape memory alloys. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics34(3): 739–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-022-01087-7
30.
YuCKangGZKanQH (2015) A micromechanical constitutive model for anisotropic cyclic deformation of super-elastic NiTi shape memory alloy single crystals. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids82: 97–136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.05.012
31.
YuanWLShiFZhangC, et al. (2025) Influence of cyclic degradation behaviors in shape memory alloy on the seismic performance of structures. Journal of Building Engineering111: 113461. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113461
32.
YuanWLShiFZhangC, et al. (2025) A novel self‐centering mechanical model for shape memory alloys incorporating cyclic degradation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics54(11): 2671–2689. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4379
33.
ZhanMLiuJSWangDL, et al. (2021) Optimized neural network prediction model of shape memory alloy and its application for structural vibration control. Materials14(21): 6593. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216593
