The utilization of geopolymer recycled mortar (GPRM) could be an economical and sustainable solution for the construction industry. While GPRM exhibits excellent mechanical properties (MP) at ambient temperature, its MP after high-temperature exposure remains unclear. In this study, twelve groups of GPRM samples with different mix proportions were designed with recycled aggregate replacement ratio (ARR) (0%, 50%, 100%), temperatures (25°C, 200°C, 400°C, 600°C,), Carbon nanotubes(CNTs) content (0.1%), and graphene oxide(GO) content (0.005%, 0.01%) as the main parameters. The variation patterns of GPRM compressive strength (CS) after high-temperature exposure were investigated through mechanical property (MP) tests after heating, and the influence of nanomaterials CNTs and GO incorporation on the internal injury development of GPRM after high-temperature exposure was revealed through microscopic tests. The results showed that as the recycled ARR rose from 0% to 50% and 100%, the CS after 600°C decreased by 11.34% and 26.5%, respectively. When the CNTs content was 0.1%, the CS after 600°C was enhanced by 15.16% compared to GPRM without nanomaterials (CNTs and GO). When GO content was 0.005% and 0.01%, the CS after 600°C was enhanced by 23.95% and 35.92%, respectively. Microscopic test results indicated that the phase composition of GPRM after high-temperature exposure was basically similar to that under ambient temperature conditions. The addition of nanomaterials CNTs and GO significantly improved the internal structural consistency and homogeneity of GPRM after high-temperature exposure, making crack generation more regular and orderly.
AlwanJ (2016) Evaluation some properties of nanometakaolin or rice husk ash cement mortar and its resistance to elevated temperature. Journal of University of Babylon24: 840–854.
2.
AmaraHArabiNPerrotA (2022) Unconventional tools for the study of the flow properties of concrete equivalent mortar based on recycled concrete aggregates. Environmental Science & Pollution Research29: 26739–26758.
3.
AmranMHuangSOnaiziA, et al. (2022) Fire spalling behavior of high-strength concrete: a critical review. Construction and Building Materials341: 127902.
4.
AntonioANetoMCincottoM (2008) Drying and autogenous shrinkage of pastes and mortars with activated slag cement. Cement and Concrete Research38: 565–574.
5.
AslaniF (2016) Thermal performance modeling of geopolymer concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering28: 04015062.
6.
BaiGZhuCLiuC, et al. (2020) An evaluation of the recycled aggregate characteristics and the recycled aggregate concrete mechanical properties. Construction and Building Materials240: 117978.
7.
BalochWKhushnoodRMemonS, et al. (2018a) Effect of elevated temperatures on mechanical performance of normal and lightweight concretes reinforced with carbon nanotubes. Fire Technology54: 1331–1367.
8.
BalochWKhushnoodRKhaliqW (2018b) Influence of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the residual performance of concrete exposed to high temperatures. Construction and Building Materials185: 44–56.
9.
BaoJWeiYMouX, et al. (2023) Chloride ingressbehavior of recycled aggregate concrete subjected to sustained compressive loading and drying-wetting cycles. Act Materiae Compositae Sinica40: 1015–1024.
10.
BerredjemLArabiNMolezL (2020) Mechanical and durability properties of concrete based on recycled coarse and fine aggregates produced from demolished concrete. Construction and Building Materials246: 118421.
11.
CaiRYeH (2021) Clinkerless ultra-high strength concrete based on alkali-activated slag at high temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research145: 106465.
12.
ChenXXiangHLiS, et al. (2025) Tensile properties and microstructure of lightweight engineered geopolymer composites containing PVA fibers and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) after high-temperature exposure. Construction and Building Materials474: 141154.
13.
ChuahSPanZSanjayanJG, et al. (2014) Nano reinforced cement and concrete composites and new perspective from graphene oxide. Construction and Building Materials73: 113–124.
14.
CollinsFSanjayanJ (1999) Strength and shrinkage properties of alkali-activated slag concrete containing porous coarse aggregate. Cement and Concrete Research29: 607–610.
15.
DanielLKongY (2010) Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete. Cement and Concrete Research40: 334–339.
16.
DB37/T 5176-2021 (2021) Mix design specification of recycled concrete. Beijing: China Construction Science and Technology Press. (in Chinese).
17.
EguchiKTeranishiKNakagomeA, et al. (2007) Application of recycled coarse aggregate by mixture to concrete construction. Construction and Building Materials21: 1542–1551.
18.
GalesJParkerTCreeD, et al. (2016) Fire performance of sustainable recycled concrete aggregates: mechanical properties at elevated temperatures and current research needs. Fire Technology52: 817–845.
19.
GaoCHuangLYanL, et al. (2020) Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete modified by nano-particles. Construction and Building Materials241: 118030.
20.
GaoFTianWChengX (2021) Investigation of moisture migration of MWCNTs concrete after different heating-cooling process by LF-NMR. Construction and Building Materials288: 123146.
21.
GB/T17671-2021 (2021) Test method of cement mortar strength (ISO method). Beijing: Standards Press of China. (in Chinese).
22.
GowdaGRaoBNaikS (2017) Behavior of recycled aggregate concrete on exposed to elevated temperature. International Journal of Civil Engineering4: 5–13.
23.
GuYFangY (2012) Shrinkage, cracking, shrinkage-reducing and toughening of alkali-activated slag cement-A short review. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society40: 76–84.
24.
GuoYZhangJChenG, et al. (2014) Compressive behaviour of concrete structures incorporating recycled concrete aggregates, rubber crumb and reinforced with steel fibre, subjected to elevated temperatures. Journal of Cleaner Production72: 193–203.
25.
JGJ/T 98-2010 (2010) Specification for mix proportion design of masonry mortar. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press. (in Chinese).
26.
JGJ/T70-2009 (2009) Standard for test method of basic performance of construction mortar. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press. (in Chinese).
27.
JiaZChenCShiJ, et al. (2019) The microstructural change of C-S-H at elevated temperature in Portland cement/GGBFS blended system. Cement and Concrete Research123: 105773.
28.
JunZ (2020) High temperature performance of graphite modified concrete. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society39: 3851–3857.
29.
KaurRKothiyalN (2019) Positive synergistic effect of superplasticizer stabilized graphene oxide and functionalized carbon nanotubes as a 3-D hybrid reinforcing phase on the mechanical properties and pore structure refinement of cement nanocomposites. Construction and Building Materials222: 358–370.
30.
KhulgadaiJ (2015) Mechanical properties and microstructure of reactive powder concrete using ternary pozzolanic materials at elevated temperature. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering19: 1050–1057.
31.
KishoreKPandeyAWagriN, et al. (2023) Technological challenges in nanoparticle-modified geopolymer concrete: a comprehensive review on nanomaterial dispersion, characterization techniques and its mechanical properties. Case Studies in Construction Materials19: e02265.
32.
KouSPoonCEtxeberriaM (2014) Residue strength, water absorption and pore size distributions of recycled aggregate concrete after exposure to elevated temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research53: 73–82.
33.
KrishnaRMishraSSethyN, et al. (2025) Impact of high-temperature exposure on the thermal and physio-mechanical performance of graphene-reinforced geopolymer composites. Construction and Building Materials489: 142285.
34.
LiJZhaoCLiuL (2018) Development report on treatment and utilization industries of solid wastes in 2017. China Environmental Protection Industry10: 7–15.
35.
LiMLuoRQinL, et al. (2022) High temperature properties of graphene oxide modified metakaolin based geopolymer paste. Cement and Concrete Composites125: 104318.
36.
LiPXiaoYCaoB (2023) Mechanical properties of geopolymer mortar with polypropylene fiber and shale ceramsite after high temperature. Journal Wuhan University Technology45: 117–124.
37.
LiuYHuXDuY, et al. (2024) A review on high-temperature resistance of geopolymer concrete. Journal of Building Engineering98: 111241.
38.
MatalkahFSalemTShaafaeyM, et al. (2019) Drying shrinkage of alkali activated binders cured at room temperature. Construction and Building Materials201: 563–570.
39.
MeftehHKebaïliOOuciefH, et al. (2013) Influence of moisture conditioning of recycled aggregates on the properties of fresh and hardened concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production54: 282–288.
40.
MerchantIMacpheeDChandlerW, et al. (2001) Toughening cement-based materials through the control of interfacial bonding. Cement and Concrete Research31: 1873–1880.
41.
ModiRBhogayataA (2023) Utilization of recycled concrete residues as secondary materials in the development of sustainable concrete composite. Materials Today: Proceedings2214–7853.
42.
MohammedASanjayanJGNazariA, et al. (2017) Effects of graphene oxide in enhancing the performance of concrete exposed to high-temperature. Australian Journal of Civil Engineering15: 61–71.
43.
MouXWeiYLuS, et al. (2023) Prediction of effective chloride diffusion coefficient of recycled aggregate concrete basedon multiscale analysis. Act Materiae Compositae Sinica40: 2876–2884.
44.
MukharjeeBBaraiV (2015) Development of construction materials using nano-silica and aggregates recycled from construction and demolition waste. Journal of the International Solid Wastes & Public Cleansing Association33: 515–523.
45.
PadminiARamamurthyKMathewsM (2009) Influence of parent concrete on the properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials23: 829–836.
46.
PanZSanjayanJGCollinsF (2014) Effect of transient creep on compressive strength of geopolymer concrete for elevated temperature exposure. Cement and Concrete Research56: 182–189.
47.
PanZTaoZCaoY, et al. (2018) Compressive strength and microstructure of alkali-activated fly ash/slag binders at high temperature. Cement and Concrete Composites86: 9–18.
48.
ParkSJangJLeeN, et al. (2016) Physicochemical properties of binder gel in alkali-activated fly ash/slag exposed to high temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research89: 72–79.
49.
PengHGeYCaiC, et al. (2019) Mechanical properties and microstructure of graphene oxide cement-based composites. Construction and Building Materials194: 102–109.
50.
PoonCAzharSAnsonM, et al. (2001) Comparison of the strength and durability performance of normal- and high-strength pozzolanic concretes at elevated temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research31: 1291–1300.
51.
PopEMannDWangQ, et al. (2006) Thermal conductance of an individual single-wall carbon nanotube above room temperature. Nano Letters6: 96–100.
52.
Revilla-CuestaVSkafMFaleschiniF, et al. (2020) Self-compacting concrete manufactured with recycled concrete aggregate: an overview. Journal of Cleaner Production262: 121362.
53.
SedaghatdoostABehfarniaK (2018) Mechanical properties of Portland cement mortar containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes at elevated temperatures. Construction and Building Materials176: 482–489.
54.
SekkalWZaouiA (2024) Unveiling the high strength and ductile character of reinforced CNT/geopolymer paste subjected to elevated temperatures. Construction and Building Materials442: 137608.
55.
ShaikhA (2018) Mechanical properties of concrete containing recycled coarse aggregate at and after exposure to elevated temperatures. Structural Concrete19: 400–410.
56.
ShaikhFChavdaVMinhajN, et al. (2018) Effect of mixing methods of nano silica on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Structural Concrete19: 387–399.
57.
SikoraPElrahmanMChungS, et al. (2019) Mechanical and microstructural properties of cement pastes containing carbon nanotubes and carbon nanotube-silica core-shell structures, exposed to elevated temperatue. Cement and Concrete Research95: 193–204.
58.
SongHYangLTangY, et al. (2015) Three-dimensional nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide–carbon nanotubes architecture supporting ultrafine palladium nanoparticles for highly efficient methanol electrooxidation. Chemistry–A European Journal21: 16631–16638.
59.
WangAZhengYZhangZ, et al. (2019) Research progress of geopolymer cementitious material modification for improving durability of concrete. Materials Reports33: 2552–2560.
60.
XiaoJZhangC (2007) Fire damage and residual strengths of recycled aggregate concrete. Key Engineering Materials348–349: 937–940.
61.
XieY (2025) Enhanced mechanical and thermal performance of high-strength engineered geopolymer composites reinforced by hybrid polyethylene fibres and carbon nanotubes. Construction and Building Materials472: 140884.
62.
YacoubADjerbiAFen-ChongT (2018) Water absorption in recycled sand: new experimental methods to estimate the water saturation degree and kinetic filling during mortar mixing. Construction and Building Materials158: 464–471.
63.
YuLTuneDShearerC, et al. (2015) Heterojunction solar cells based on silicon and composite films of graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes. ChemSusChem8(17): 2940–2947.
64.
YuanJHePJiaD, et al. (2017) In situ processing of MWCNTs/leucite composites through geopolymer precursor. Journal of the European Ceramic Society37: 2219–2226.
65.
ZaidiSKhanMNaqviT (2023) A review on the properties of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) modified with nano-silica. Materials Today: Proceedings2214–7853.
66.
ZegaCDi MaioAA (2006) Recycled concrete exposed to high temperatures. Magazine of Concrete Research58: 675–682.
67.
ZegaCDi MaioAA (2009) Recycled concrete made with different natural coarse aggregates exposed to high temperature. Construction and Building Materials23: 2047–2052.
68.
ZhanPXuJWangJ, et al. (2022) A review of recycled aggregate concrete modified by nanosilica and graphene oxide: materials, performances and mechanism. Journal of Cleaner Production375: 134116.
69.
ZhangLKaiMLiewKM (2017) Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical performance of CNT-reinforced cementitious composites at elevated temperatures. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing95: 286–293.
70.
ZhangHWangYLehmanDE, et al. (2020) Time-dependent drying shrinkage model for concrete with coarse and fine recycled aggregate. Cement and Concrete Composites105: 103426.
71.
ZhouCLiFHuJ, et al. (2017) Enhanced mechanical properties of cement paste by hybrid graphene oxide/carbon nanotubes. Construction and Building Materials134: 336–345.
72.
ZhouYDanHMaZ (2024) Experimental investigation on the durability of geopolymer repaired mortar based on metakaolin and blast furnace slag. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering21: 3213–3224.
73.
ZiJWeiHZengQ (2020) Recent advances in carbon nanotube-geopolymer composite. Construction and Building Materials252: 118940.
