Due to the growing demand for long-span bridges, pre-tensioned bulb-tee (BT) girders with numerous prestressing strands are utilized in bridge construction. To efficiently place a large number of prestressing strands, the girders are designed with wide flanges, a narrow web, and a deep height. This recent bridge design trend raised concerns about splitting cracks at the end region of the girders as the prestress is released with accompanying high bursting and/or spalling forces. In this study, the applicability of shape memory alloy (SMA) in the girder end region is evaluated numerically using finite element method (FEM). First, an experimental study is conducted to investigate the recovery stress (prestressing force) of NiTiNb bars inside the concrete through electrical heating. In the numerical analysis phase, the recommended model in the PCI Bridge Design Manual (BT-72) is analyzed using FEM and compared to numerical models in which one or two end steel stirrups are substituted with SMA stirrups capable of applying prestress in the vertical direction by heating. The end region behavior is estimated qualitatively by evaluating the maximum principal strain at web regions and quantitatively observing the crack propagation. SMA stirrup shows a significant impact in reducing the degree and propagation of end region cracks.
ACI Committee 224 (2001) Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
3.
ACI Committee 318 (2019) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
4.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2012) AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 6th edition. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
5.
AndrawesBDesRochesR (2007) Comparison between shape memory alloy seismic restrainers and other bridge retrofit devices. Journal of Bridge Engineering12(6): 700–709.
6.
BaeH (2008) Design of Reinforcement-free Bridge Decks with Wide Flange Prestressed Precast Girders. PhD dissertation, Madison: University of Wisconsin.
7.
BardowAKSeraderianRLCulmoMP (1997) Design fabrication and construction of the new england bulb-tee girder. PCI Journal42(6): 30–40.
8.
BhaumikSK (2008) Progress in the understanding of NiTi shape memory alloys. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals61: 435–445.
9.
BuehlerWJGilfrichJVWileyRC (1963) Effect of low-temperature phase changes on the mechanical properties of alloys near composition TiNi. Journal of Applied Physics34(5): 1475–1477.
10.
ChangWSArakiY (2016) Use of shape-memory alloys in construction: a critical review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Civil Engineering169(2): 87–95.
11.
ChenQAndrawesB (2017) Cyclic stress-strain behavior of concrete confined with NiTiNb-shape memory alloy spirals. Journal of Structural Engineering143(5): 04017008.
12.
ChoiEChoSCHuJW, et al. (2010) Recovery and residual stress of SMA wires and applications for concrete structures. Smart Materials and Structures19(9): 094013.
13.
ChoiENamTHChungYS, et al. (2012) Behavior of NiTiNb SMA wires under recovery stress or prestressing. Nanoscale Research Letters7: 66.
14.
Cortés-PuentesWLPalermoD (2018) Seismic retrofit of concrete shear wall with SMA tension braces. Journal of Structural Engineering144(2): 04017200.
15.
CostanzaGTataME (2020) Shape memory alloys for aerospace, recent developments, and new applications: a short review. Materials (Basel)13(8): 1856.
16.
DerkowskiWDybaM (2017) Behaviour of end zone of pre-tensioned concrete elements. Procedia Engineering193: 19–26.
17.
DesRochesRDelemontM (2002) Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys. Engineering Structures24(3): 325–332.
18.
DommerKAndrawesB (2012) Thermomechanical characterization of NiTiNb shape memory alloy for concrete active confinement applications. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering24(10): 1274–1282.
19.
FereigSM (1996) Economic preliminary design of bridges with prestressed I-girders. Journal of Bridge Engineering1(1): 18–25.
20.
FuXGuojunMXinqingZ, et al. (2009) Effects of Nb content on yield strength of NiTiNb alloys in martensite state. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics22(6): 658–662.
21.
GerenKLTadrosMK (1994) The NU precast/prestressed concrete bridge I-girder series. PCI Journal39(3): 26–39.
22.
GergelyPSozenMA (1967) Design of anchorage-zone reinforcement in prestressed concrete beams. PCI Journal12: 63–75.
23.
GergelyPSozenMASiessCP (1963) The Effect of Reinforcement on Anchorage Zone Cracks in Prestressed Concrete Members, Structural Research Series No. 271. Urbana: University of Illinois.
24.
GreningerABMooradianVG (1938) Strain transformation in metastable beta copper-zinc and beta copper-Ti alloys. AIME TRNAS128: 337–369.
25.
GuyonY (1953) Prestressed Concrete. 1st edition. New York: J. Wiley and Sons, Inc.
26.
HelmS (1991) Cost comparison of AASHTO type IV and modified type IV bridge beams with 54- and 63-in. Bulb-tees. Transportation Research Record1319: 109–114.
27.
HognestadE (1951) A study of combined bending and axial load in reinforced concrete members, university of Illinois. Engineering Experiment Station. Bulletin.
28.
JahjouhMErhanS (2022) Optimization of prestressed concrete bridge girder section using a modified harmony search algorithm. Structures46: 625–636.
29.
JaniJMLearyMSubicA, et al. (2014) A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Materials and Design56: 1078–1113.
30.
JankeLCzaderskiCMotavalliM, et al. (2005) Applications of shape memory alloys in civil engineering structures-overview, limits and new ideas. Materials and Structures38: 578–592.
31.
KauffmanGBMayoI (1997) The story of nitinol: the serendipitous discovery of the memory metal and its applications. The Chemical Educator2: 1–21.
32.
LiHLiuZQLiZW, et al. (2004) Study on damage emergency repair performance of a simple beam embedded with shape memory alloys. Advances in Structural Engineering7(6): 495–502.
33.
MarshallWTMattockAH (1962) Control of horizontal cracking in the ends of pretensioned prestressed concrete girders. PCI Journal7: 56–74.
34.
McCormickNLordJ (2010) Digital image correlation. Materials Today13(12): 52–54.
35.
MutasharRSargandSKhouryI (2017) End Zone Cracks for Skewed Pre-tensioned Box Beam Concrete Girders. Congress on Technical Advancement, 77–88.
36.
NareshCBosePSCRaoCSP (2016) Shape memory alloys: a state of art review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering149(1): 012054.
37.
OkumusP (2012) Nonlinear Analysis of Pretensioned Bridge Girder Ends to Understand and Control Cracking at Prestress Release. PhD dissertation. Madison: University of Wisconsin Madison.
38.
ÖlanderA (1932) An electrochemical investigation of solid cadmium-gold alloys. Journal of the Chemical Society54(10): 3819–3833.
39.
OzbulutOEHamiltonRFSherifMM, et al. (2015) Feasibility of self-prestressing concrete members using shape memory alloys. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures26(18): 2500–2514.
40.
O’CallaghanMRBayrakO (2007) Tensile Stresses in the End Regions of Pretensioned I-Beams at Release. Electronic thesis. Univ. of Texas at Austin.
RonankiVSBurkhalterDIAaletiS, et al. (2017) Experimental and analytical investigation of end zone cracking in BT-78 girders. Engineering Structures151: 503–517.
43.
RossBEWillisMDHamiltonHR, et al. (2014) Comparison of details for controlling end region cracks in precast, pretensioned concrete I-girders. PCI Journal59(2): 96–108.
44.
ShinMAndrawesB (2010) Experimental investigation of actively confined concrete using shape memory alloys. Engineering Structures32: 656–664.
45.
SiegertWNeukingKMertmannM, et al. (2003) First cycle shape memory effect in the ternary NiTiNb system. Journal de Physique112: 739–742.
46.
SinhaATatarNTatarJ (2020) Rapid heat-activated post-tensioning of damaged reinforced concrete girders with unbonded near-surface mounted (NSM) NiTiNb shape-memory alloy wires. Materials and Structures53(4): 88.
47.
SongGMaNLiH-N (2006) Applications of shape memory alloys in civil structures. Engineering Structures28: 1266–1274.
48.
SoroushianPOstowariKNossoniA, et al. (2001) Repair and strengthening of concrete structures through application of corrective posttensioning forces with shape memory alloys. Transportation Research Record1770(1): 20–26.
49.
SuhailRAmatoGMcCrumD (2010) Active and passive confinement of shape modified low strength concrete columns using SMA and FRP systems. Composite Structures251: 112649.
SungMAndrawesB (2021) Innovative local prestressing system for concrete crossties using shape memory alloys. Engineering Structures247: 113048.
52.
TuanCYYehiaSAJongpitaksseelN, et al. (2004) End zone reinforcement for pretensioned concrete girders. PCI Journal49(3): 68–82.
53.
UijlJA (1983) Tensile stresses in the transmission zones of hollow-core slabs prestressed with pretensioned strands. TU Delft, Stevinlaboratory, Report No. 5-83-10, Sept.
54.
Van MeirvenneKDe CorteWBoelV, et al. (2018) Non-linear 3D finite element analysis of the anchorage zones of pretensioned concrete girders and experimental verification. Engineering Structures172: 764–779.
55.
WangMJiangMLiaoG, et al. (2012) Martensitic transformation involved mechanical behaviors and wide hysteresis of NiTiNb shape memory alloys. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International22(2): 130–138.
56.
XiaoFMaGZhaoX, et al. (2007) A novel TiNiNb shape memory alloy with high yield strength and high damping capacity. International Conference on Smart Materials and Nanotechnology in Engineering6423: 674–679.
57.
YaparOBasuPKNordendaleN (2015) Accurate finite element modeling of pretensioned prestressed concrete beams. Engineering Structures101: 163–178.
58.
YousefpourHHrynykT (2018) End region behavior of pretensioned I-girders employing 0.7 in. (17.8 mm) strands. ACI Structural Journal115(1): 91–102.
