The application of post-installed GFRP bars is notably illustrated in replacing deteriorated bridge barriers. Fourteen steel-reinforced concrete slabs were fabricated, into which 120 GFRP bars were anchored using epoxy adhesive. These anchored GFRP bars were exposed to outdoor conditions throughout one winter to assess the impact of freeze-thaw cycles before undergoing testing to evaluate their ultimate pullout load. The experimental program included two types of adhesives, various diameters of bars, two categories of GFRP bars (sand-coated and ribbed-surface), and three nominal embedment depths for each bar diameter. For each bar combination, five identical samples were constructed. The predominant observed failure modes were pullout failures, which contributed to the development of an analytical model. A regression analysis was conducted to investigate the influence of embedment depth and bar diameter on pullout capacity, resulting in a best-fit formula that may be used in design practices.
AhmedEAEl-SalakawyEFBenmokraneB (2008) Tensile capacity of GFRP post installed adhesive anchors in concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction12(6): 596–607.
2.
American Concrete Institute (ACI 318-19) (2019a) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
3.
American Concrete Institute (ACI 355-4M-19) (2019b) Qualification of post-installed adhesive. Anchors in Concrete. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
4.
ASTM (2010) Standard Test Methods for Strength of Anchors in Concrete Elements - E488/E488M. Conshohocken, PA, US: American Society for Testing and Materials.
5.
ASTM (2015) ASTM D695-15 - Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International.
6.
ASTM (2020) ASTM C882/C882M-20 - Standard Test Method for Bond Strength of Epoxy-Resin Systems Used with Concrete by Slant Shear. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International.
7.
ASTM (2022a) ASTM D638-22 - Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International.
8.
ASTM (2022b) ASTM D570-22 - Standard Test Method for Water Absorption of Plastics. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International.
9.
AzimiHSennahKSayed-AhmedM, et al. (2014a) Bridge deck-guardrail anchorage detailing for sustainable construction. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering19(10): 04014039.
10.
AzimiHSennahKTropyninaE, et al. (2014b) Anchorage capacity of concrete bridge barriers reinforced with GFRP bars with headed ends. Journal of Bridge Engineering19(9): 04014030.
11.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA) (2014) Design of concrete structures. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA standard, Vol. A23.3-14.
12.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA) (2019) “Specification for fiber-reinforced polymers” CSA S807-19. Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Standards Association.
13.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA) (2021) Design and Construction of Building Components with Fiber Reinforced Polymers. CSA S806-12. Toronto, ON, Canada: Canadian Standards Association, Re-approved in 2017.
14.
CharneyFPalKSilvaJ (2013) Recommended procedures for development and splicing of post-installed bonded reinforcing bars in concrete structures. ACI Structural Journal110(3): 437–447.
15.
CookR (1993) Behavior of chemically bonded anchors. Journal of Structural Engineering119(9): 2744–2762.
16.
CookRKonzR (2001) Factors influencing bond strength of adhesive anchors. ACI Structural Journal98(1): 76–86.
17.
CookRKunzJFuchsW, et al. (1998) Behavior and design of single adhesive anchors under tensile load in uncracked concrete. ACI Structural Journal95(1): 9–26.
18.
DervishhasaniGSennahK (2018) Investigation on the capacity of TL-5 GFRP-reinforced concrete bridge barrier-deck anchorage subjected to transverse vehicle impact loading. In: Proceedings of 10th Intern. Conf. On Short and Medium Span Bridges.Quebec, Canada: CSCE, 1–10.
19.
EligehausenRMalléeRRehmG (1984) Befestigungen mit Verbundankern (Fastenings with bonded anchors). Betonwerk und Fertigteil-Technik84(10): 682–692.
20.
EligehausenRCookRApplJ (2006a) Behavior and design of adhesive bonded anchors. ACI Structural Journal103(6): 822–832.
21.
EligehausenRMalléeRSilvaJ (2006b) Anchorage in Concrete Construction. Berlin, Germany: Ernst & Sohn.
22.
FuchsWEligehausenRBreenJ (1995) Concrete capacity design (CCD) approach for fastening to concrete. ACI Structural Journal92(1): 73–94.
23.
GyawaliMSennahKAhmedM, et al. (2024) Experimental study of static and fatigue push-out test on headed stud shear connectors in UHPC composite steel beams. Structures70: 107923. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107923.
24.
HaoZ-HZengJ-JChenG-M, et al. (2024) Durability of FRP-to-concrete bonded joints subjected to 110 months accelerated laboratory and field exposure. Engineering Structures305: 117681.
IslamSAfefyHMSennahK, et al. (2015) Bond characteristics of straight- and headed-end ribbed-surface GFRP bars embedded in high-strength concrete. Construction and Building Materials83: 283–298.
27.
KhalafallaISennahK (2021) Ultimate and fatigue responses of GFRP-reinforced, UHPC-filled, bridge deck joints. ACI Special Publication SP-356: Development & Applications of FRP ReinforcementsDA-FRPR’21: 347–374. DOI: 10.14359/51737280.
28.
KhederzadehHSennahK (2014) Development of cost-effective PL-3 concrete bridge barrier reinforced with sand-coated glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars: static load tests. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering41(4): 368–379.
29.
KimSSmithS (2009) Behaviour of handmade FRP anchors under tensile load in uncracked concrete. Advances in Structural Engineering12(6): 845–865.
30.
KimSSmithS (2010) Pullout strength models for FRP anchors in uncracked concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction14(4): 406–414.
31.
LuJAfefyHMAzimiH, et al. (2021) Bond performance of sand-coated and ribbed-surface glass fiber reinforced polymer bars in high-performance concrete. Structures34: 10–19.
32.
LuJAfefyHMAzimiH, et al. (2022) Bond characteristics of glass fiber reinforced polymer bars in high-strength concrete. Structures and Buildings175(10): 48–764.
33.
LuCQiZZhengY, et al. (2023) Long-term tensile performance of GFRP bars in loaded concrete and aggressive solutions. Journal of Building Engineering64: 105587.
34.
McVayMCookRKrishnamurthyK (1996) Pullout simulation of postinstalled chemically bonded anchors. Journal of Structural Engineering122(9): 1016–1024.
35.
OzbakkalogluTSaatciogluM (2009) Tensile behavior of FRP anchors in concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction13(2): 82–92.
36.
ÖzdemirG (2005) Mechanical Properties of CFRP Anchorage. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University, 74. Master’s thesis.
37.
PengKDHuangJQHuangBT, et al. (2023) Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using geopolymer-bonded small-diameter FRP bars. Composite Structures305: 116513.
38.
PiccininRCattaneoSBiolziL (2013) Breakout capacity of headed anchors in confined concrete: experimental evidence. ACI Structural Journal110(3): 469–479.
RostamiMSennahKAfefyHM (2017) Ultimate capacity of barrier-deck anchorage in MTQ TL-5 barrier reinforced with headed-end, high-modulus, sand-coated GFRP bars. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering45: 263–278. DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2017-0002.
41.
RostamiMSennahKHedjaziS (2019a) GFRP bars anchorage resistance in a GFRP-reinforced concrete bridge barrier. Materials Journal12(15): 1–24.
42.
RostamiMSennahMMostafaA (2019b) Experimental study on the transverse load carrying capacity of TL-5 bridge barrier reinforced with special profile GFRP bars. ASCE Journal of Composites for Construction23(4): 1–16.
43.
Sayed-AhmedMSennahKAfefyHM (2024a) Structural behavior of full-depth deck panels having developed closure strips reinforced with GFRP bars and filled with UHPFRC. Journal of Composites Science8(11): 468.
44.
Sayed-AhmedMSennahKAfefyHM (2024b) Fatigue and ultimate strength evaluation of GFRP-reinforced, laterally restrained, full-depth precast deck panels with developed UHPFRC filled transverse closure strips. Applied Sciences14(19): 8806.
SennahKHedjaziS (2018) Structural qualification of a developed GFRP-reinforced PL-3 concrete bridge barrier using vehicle crash testing. International Journal of Crashworthiness24(3): 1–18.
47.
SennahKKhederzadehH (2014) Development of cost-effective PL-3 concrete bridge barrier reinforced with sand-coated glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars: vehicle crash test. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering41(4): 357–367.
48.
SennahKMostafaA (2018) Performance of a developed TL-5 concrete bridge barrier reinforced with GFRP hooked bars: vehicle crash testing. ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering23(2): 1–20.
49.
SennahKTropyninaEIbrahimZ, et al. (2018) Structural qualification of a developed GFRP-reinforced PL-3 concrete bridge barrier using ultimate load testing. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials12(63): 1–22.
SunJ-HSuN-JHeZ-Q, et al. (2014) Durability of concrete-encapsulated GFRP bars subjected to seawater immersion. Case Studies in Construction Materials20: e03249.
52.
ZhangKZhangQXiaoJ (2022) Durability of FRP bars and FRP bar reinforced seawater sea sand concrete structures in marine environments. Construction and Building Materials350: 128898.
53.
ZhuPLiZZhuY, et al. (2023) Prediction of the long-term tensile strength of GFRP bars in concrete. Buildings13(4): 1035.
54.
ZhuJXWengKFHuangBT, et al. (2024a) Ultra-High-Strength Engineered Cementitious Composites (UHS-ECC) panel reinforced with FRP bar/grid: development and flexural performance. Engineering Structures302: 117193.
55.
ZhuJXWengKFLiuWH, et al. (2024b) Thin-layer Ultra-High-Strength Engineered Cementitious Composites (UHS-ECC) reinforced with small-diameter FRP bars for structural strengthening. Thin-Walled Structures205: 112592.
