An experimental study on the behavior of interlocking masonry blocks manufactured using 3D printed mold

Abstract

Masonry structure built with mortarless interlocking blocks effectively reduces the construction time and costs and also improves the quality of construction. However, due to the vast variety in the construction methods and geometry of these blocks, their behavior has not been fully understood. In this paper, an experimental study was conducted to understand the in-plane and out-of-plane behavior of interlocking mortarless masonry. Four types of interlocking blocks (namely trapezoidal-shaped, Lego-shaped, cross-shaped, and checkered-shaped blocks) as well as one simple control block with the same size as the interlocking blocks were considered. Innovative 3D printed molds were designed and manufactured to construct the designed interlocking blocks with different shapes. Masonry units were then assembled with and without adhesive paste and were subjected to six different tests including compressive, diagonal shear, in-plane and out-of-plane shear tests, as well as flexural tests in parallel and perpendicular to the bed joints directions. The results were compared in terms of the general behavior, crack pattern, failure mode, and ultimate strength. According to the results, in the flexural test perpendicular to the bed joints and diagonal shear tests, the trapezoidal-shaped and Lego-shaped blocks had the highest strength because of their side shear keys. In the flexural test in parallel to the bed joints, the cross-shaped block had the highest strength due to its highest total locked area. In the in-plane and out-of-plane shear tests, the cross- and checkered-shaped blocks respectively had the best performance due to their high inter-block contact area and out-of-plane effective contact area. This research provides a comprehensive evaluation of the effect of shapes on the behavior of interlocking blocks under different loading conditions. The outcome of this study helps designers to identify the most suitable interlocking shape based on the critical type of loading that masonry needs to be designed for.

Keywords

interlocking blocks in-plane behavior masonry out-of-plane behavior strength 3D printer

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afzal

Abbas

Abbass

, et al. (2020) Characterization of sustainable interlocking burnt clay brick wall panels: an alternative to conventional bricks. Construction and Building Materials 231: 117190.

Al-Fakih

Mohammed

Wahab

MMA

, et al. (2020a) Flexural behavior of rubberized concrete interlocking masonry walls under out-of-plane load. Construction and Building Materials 263: 120661.

Al-Fakih

Wahab

Mohammed

, et al. (2020b) Experimental study on axial compressive behavior of rubberized interlocking masonry walls. Journal of Building Engineering 29: 101107.

Ali

Gultom

Chouw

(2012) Capacity of innovative interlocking blocks under monotonic loading. Construction and Building Materials 37: 812–821.

Anand

Ramamurthy

(2000) Development and performance evaluation of interlocking-block masonry. Journal of Architectural Engineering 6(2): 45–51.

Anand

Ramamurthy

(1999) Techniques for accelerating masonry construction. International Journal for Housing Science and its Applications 23: 233–242.

ASTM C109-20 (2020) Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars.

ASTM C1314-18 (2018) standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms.

ASTM C348-20 (2020) standard test method for flexural strength of hydraulic mortar.

10.

ASTM C1437-20 (2020) Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar.

11.

ASTM E519-20 (2020) Standard test method for diagonal tension (shear) in masonry assemblages.

12.

ASTM E518-15 (2015) Standard test methods for flexural bond strength of masonry.

13.

Ayed

Limam

Aidi

, et al. (2016) Experimental and numerical study of interlocking stabilized earth blocks mechanical behavior. Journal of Building Engineering 7: 207–216.

14.

Baneshi

Dehghan

(2021) Introducing a novel interlocking block and experimental study on in-plane and out-of-plane behavior and strength of its prisms specimens. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering 8: 34.

15.

Castro

Laursen

Jansen

, et al. (2014) Performance of interlocking compressed earth block infill in confined masonry construction. In Proceedings of the Tenth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, AL, USA, July 21-25, pp. 21–25.

16.

Dehghan

Najafgholipour

Baneshi

, et al. (2019) Experimental study on effect of water–cement ratio and sand grading on workability and mechanical properties of masonry mortars in Iran. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 43(1): 21–32.

17.

Dehghan

Najafgholipour

Baneshi

, et al. (2018) Mechanical and bond properties of solid clay brick masonry with different sand grading. Construction and Building Materials 174: 1–10.

18.

Fay

Cooper

Morais

HFD

(2014) Innovative interlocked soil-cement block for the construction of masonry to eliminate the settling mortar. Construction and Building Materials 52: 391–395.

19.

Gallegos

(1988) Mortarless masonry: the Mecano system. International Journal for Housing Science and its Applications 12(2): 145–157.

20.

Ikinson

(1984) Haener stacking mortarless block system. Ontario: Engineering Design Manual by Ikinson Engineering.

21.

Intaboot

(2020) Innovation of interlocking block mixing with biomass for sound absorption and thermal conductivity in Thailand. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology 18(8): 473–480.

22.

Jeslin

Padmanaban

(2020) Experimental studies on interlocking block as wall panels. Materials Today Proceedings 21: 1–6.

23.

Kohail

Elshafie

Rashad

, et al. (2019) Behavior of post-tensioned dry-stack interlocking masonry shear walls under cyclic in-plane loading. Construction and Building Materials 196: 539–554.

24.

Kumar

Vigneshvar

(2014) Development of an innovative interlock blocks. Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 1(5): 114–118.

25.

Gaire

(2020) Development and mechanical evaluation of a new interlocking earth masonry block. Advances in Structural Engineering 23(2): 234–247.

26.

Maïni

(2005) Earthen architecture for sustainable habitat and compressed stabilised earth block technology. The Auroville Earth Institute, Auroville Building Center-India 14(4): 112–128.

27.

Ngapeya

GGC

Waldmann

(2020) Experimental and analytical analysis of the load-bearing capacity Pu of improved dry-stacked masonry. Journal of Building Engineering 27: 100927.

28.

Osman

Mohamed

Sulaiman

, et al. (2014) Experimental analysis of Interlocking load bearing wall brickool system. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Vol. 594, 439–443.

29.

Qamar

Thomas

Ali

(2020) Improvement in lateral resistance of mortar-free interlocking wall with plaster having natural fibres. Construction and Building Materials 234: 117387.

30.

Stirling

Jansen

, et al. (2015) Testing of flexure-dominated interlocking compressed earth block walls. Construction and Building Materials 83: 34–43.

31.

Ramamurthy

Kunhanandan Nambiar

(2004) Accelerated masonry construction review and future prospects. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 6(1): 1–9.

32.

Shakir

Mohammed

(2013) Manufacturing of bricks in the past, in the present and in the future: a state of the art review. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences 2(3): 145–156.

33.

Shi

Zhang

Hao

, et al. (2021) Experimental and numerical investigation on the compressive properties of interlocking blocks. Engineering Structures 228: 111561.

34.

Sturm

Ramos

Lourenço

(2015) Characterization of dry-stack interlocking compressed earth blocks. Materials and Structures 48(9): 3059–3074.

35.

Thanoon

Jaafar

Kadir

MRA

, et al. (2004) Development of an innovative interlocking load bearing hollow block system in Malaysia. Construction and Building Materials 18(6): 445–454.

36.

Uzoegbo

Ngowi

(2003) Structural behaviour of dry-stack interlocking block walling systems subject to in-plane loading. Concrete Beton 103: 9–13.

37.

Vekey

RCD

(1996) Determination of shear strength index for masonry unit/mortar junction. Matériaux et constructions 29(192): 459–463.