This paper probes the effects of the Tuned Mass Damper (TMD) device on the response of a 40-story building including three types of soils and experiencing 16 far-field earthquakes. The Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) method is employed to obtain the best settings for TMD values and the objective is reducing the maximum drift of the structure considering soil structure interaction (SSI) effects. The TMD effects on the displacement and acceleration response of the structure as well as its influence on the drift response are studied. Moreover, the frequency analyses of the drift responses in addition to the story locations with the highest drifts are also investigated. It is shown that the optimized design results in considerable reduction in drifts enhancing the profits of utilizing the TMD device.
AbachizadehMKolahanF (2007) Evaluating the discretization of search space in continuous problems for ant colony optimization. In: 37th International conference on computers and industrial engineering (CIE 37th), Alexandria, Egypt, 20–23 October.
2.
AbachizadehMTahaniM (2009) An ant colony optimization approach to multi-objective optimal design of symmetric hybrid laminates for maximum fundamental frequency and minimum cost. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization37: 367–376.
3.
AbachizadehMTahaniM (2011) Optimizing laminated composites using ant colony algorithms. In: OstfeldA (ed.) Ant Colony Optimization - Methods and Applications. Vienna: InTech, pp.131–146.
4.
AbachizadehMYousefi-KomaAShariatpanahiM (2010) Optimization of a beam-type actuator using insects swarm intelligence methods. In: ASME 10th Biennial conference on engineering systems design and analysis, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–14 July, pp.559–566. ASME.
5.
BaghliFZEl bakkaliLLakhalY (2017) Optimization of arm manipulator trajectory planning in the presence of obstacles by ant colony algorithm. Procedia Engineering181: 560–567.
6.
CaoLLiC (2018) Enhanced hybrid active tuned mass dampers for structures. Structural Control & Health Monitoring25(2): e2067.
7.
CaoLLiC (2019) Tuned tandem mass dampers-inerters with broadband high effectiveness for structures under white noise base excitations. Structural Control & Health Monitoring26(4): e2319.
8.
ChangCC (1999) Mass dampers and their optimal designs for building vibration control. Engineering Structures21(5): 454–463.
9.
ChopraAK (2012) Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 4th edn.New Jersey: Prentice Hall- Pearson Education, Inc.
10.
DorigoM (1992) Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. PhD Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Italy (In Italian).
11.
DorigoMGambardellaLM (1997) Ant colony system: A cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation1(1): 53–66.
12.
DorigoMStutzleT (2004) Ant Colony Optimization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13.
FarshidianfarASoheiliS (2013a) Ant colony optimization of tuned mass dampers for earthquake oscillations of high-rise structures including soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering51: 14–22.
14.
FarshidianfarASoheiliS (2013b) Optimization of TMD parameters for earthquake vibrations of tall buildings including soil structure interaction. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering3(3): 409–429.
15.
FrahmH (1911) Device for damping vibrations of bodies. Serial No: 525455, U.S. Patent No: 989958, 9 pp.
16.
GrecoRMaranoG (2013) Optimum design of tuned mass dampers by displacement and energy perspectives. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering49: 243–253.
17.
GhoshABasuB (2004) Effect of soil interaction on the performance of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications. Journal of Sound and Vibration274(3–5): 1079–1090.
18.
LeungAYTZhangH (2009) Particle swarm optimization of tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures31(3): 715–728.
19.
LiC (2010) Effectiveness of active multiple-tuned mass dampers for asymmetric structures considering soil-structure interaction effects. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings21(8): 543–565.
20.
LiCYuZXiongXWangC (2010) Active multiple-tuned mass dampers for asymmetric structures considering soil–structure interaction. Structural Control and Health Monitoring17: 452–472.
21.
LiuMYChiangWLHwangJH (2008) Wind-induced vibration of high-rise building with tuned mass damper including soil–structure interaction. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics96(6–7): 1092–1102.
22.
LiuQPaavolaJ (2015) Drift reliability-based optimization method of frames subjected to stochastic earthquake ground motion. Applied Mathematical Modelling39(3–4): 982–999.
23.
MaranoGCGrecoRTrentadueF (2007) Constrained reliability-based optimization of linear tuned mass dampers for seismic control. International Journal of Solids and Structures44(22–23): 7370–7388.
24.
MattaE (2013) Effectiveness of tuned mass dampers against ground motion pulses. Journal of Structural Engineering139(2): 188–198.
25.
NewmarkNM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. Journal of Engineering Mechanics85(3): 67–94.
26.
OviedoAJMidorikawaMAsariT (2010) Earthquake response of ten-story story-drift-controlled reinforced concrete frames with hysteretic dampers. Engineering Structures32(6): 1735–1746.
27.
RanaRSoongTT (1998) Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers. Engineering Structures20(3): 193–204.
28.
SankarBRUmamaheswaraP (2018) Multi objective optimization of CFRP composite drilling using ant colony algorithm. Materials Today: Proceedings5(2): 4855–4860.
29.
TaniguchiTKiureghianADMelkumyanM (2008) Effect of tuned mass damper on displacement demand of base-isolated structures. Engineering Structures30(12): 3478–3488.
30.
TigliOF (2012) Optimum vibration absorber (tuned mass damper) design for linear damped systems subjected to random loads. Journal of Sound and Vibration331(13): 3035–3049.
31.
ThomsonWTDahlehMD (1997) Theory of Vibration with Applications, 5th edn.London: Prentice Hall.
32.
WangJFLinCC (2005) Seismic performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for soil–irregular building interaction systems. International Journal of Solids and Structures42(20): 5536–5554.
33.
WangWHuaXWangW, et al. (2017) Optimum design of a novel pounding tuned mass damper under harmonic excitation. Smart Materials and Structures26(5): 055024.
34.
WirschingPHCampbellGW (1974) Minimal structural response under random excitation using the vibration absorber. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics2(4): 303–312.
