This study aims to investigate the strength reduction effect of chord axial stresses on the static strength of cracked tubular T/Y-joints under out-of-plane or in-plane bending moment using finite element analyses. The cracked tubular T/Y-joints contain a semi-elliptical surface crack at the weld toe of the chord. The benchmark analysis compares the numerically computed load–deformation response of a cracked X-joint fabricated from high-strength steel reported in a recent experimental study. This investigation quantifies the strength reduction caused by the chord axial stresses using the chord stress function Qcf. The parametric study covers the effect caused by the variation in both the local crack geometries, that is, the crack area and the global joint dimensions on the computed chord stress function. Finally, we give recommendations to calculate the strength reduction of the investigated cracked joints due to the chord axial stresses.
ABAQUS (2013) User’s Manual, Version 6.13. Pawtucket, RI: Karlsson & Sorenson, Inc.
2.
AhmedAQianXD (2014) A deformation limit based on failure assessment diagram for fatigue-cracked X-joints under in-plane bending. Ships and Offshore Structures11(2): 182–197.
3.
API-RP-2A-WSD (2005) Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design. Washington, DC: America Petroleum Institute.
4.
BS 7910:2013+A1 (2015) Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. London: British Standards Institution.
5.
BurdekinFM (March, 2002) The static strength of cracked joints in tubular members. Offshore Technology, Report-2001/080. London: Health and Safety Executive.
6.
ChooYSQianXDWardenierJ (2006) Effects of boundary conditions and chord stresses on static strength of thick-walled CHS K-joints. Journal of Constructional Steel Research62(4): 316–328.
7.
ChooYSQianXDLiewJYRet al. (2003) Static strength of thick-walled CHS X-joints—Part II. Effect of chord stresses. Journal of Constructional Steel Research59(10): 1229–1250.
8.
GaoFShaoYBGhoWM (2007) Stress and strain concentration factors of completely overlapped tubular joints under lap brace IPB load. Journal of Constructional Steel Research63: 305–316.
9.
LeeCKLieSTChiewSPet al. (2004) Numerical models verification of cracked tubular T, Y and K-joints under combined loads. Engineering Fracture Mechanics72(7): 983–1009.
10.
LiTLieSTShaoYB (2018) Plastic collapse load prediction of cracked circular hollow section T/Y-joints under in-plane and out-of-plane bending. Ocean Engineering148: 136–148.
11.
LieSTYangZM (2009) Safety assessment procedure for a cracked square hollow section (SHS) Y-joint. Advances in Structural Engineering12(3): 359–372.
12.
LieSTLiTShaoYB (2013) Plastic collapse load prediction and failure assessment diagram analysis of cracked circular hollow section T-joint and Y-joint. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Material & Structure37(3): 314–324.
13.
LieSTLiTShaoYBet al. (2016) Plastic collapse load prediction of cracked circular hollow section gap K-joint under in-plane bending. Marine Structures50: 20–34.
14.
LieSTShaoYBLeeCKet al. (2006) Stress intensity factor solutions for semi-elliptical weld-toe cracks in tubular K-joints. Advances in Structural Engineering9(1): 129–139.
15.
LiuDKYuYWardenierJ (1998a) Effect of boundary conditions and chord preload on the strength of RHS multiplanar gap KK-joints. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on tubular structures, Singapore, 26–28 August.
16.
LiuDKYuYWardenierJ (1998b) Effect of boundary conditions and chord preload on the strength of RHS uniplanar gap K-joints. In: Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on tubular structures, Singapore, 26–28 August.
17.
LuLHDe WinkelGDYuYet al. (1994) Deformation limit for the ultimate strength of hollow section joints. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on tubular structures, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 14–16 December.
18.
MohammadALHamidA (2010) Effect of geometrical parameters on SCF Distribution along the weld toe of tubular KT-joints under balanced axial loads. International Journal of Fatigue32(4): 703–719.
19.
QianXDLiYOuZY (2013) Ductile tearing assessment of high-strength steel X-joints under in-plane bending. Engineering Failure Analysis28: 176–191.
20.
SaadSBLeenSBHydeTH (2001) Finite element study on the static strength of a cracked tubular T-joint. In: Proceedings of the 9th international symposium and Euro conference on tubular structures, Düsseldorf, 3–5 April.
21.
ShaoYB (2007) Geometry effect on the stress distribution along weld toe for tubular T- and K-joints under axial loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research63(10): 1351–1360.
22.
ShaoYBLieST (2005) Parametric equation of stress intensity factor for tubular K-joint under balanced axial loads. International Journal of Fatigue27(6): 666–679.
23.
Talei-FazBBrennanFPDoverWD (2004) Residual static strength of high strength steel cracked tubular joints. Marine Structures17: 291–309.
24.
Van Der VegteGJMakinoYChooYSet al. (2001) The influence of chord stress on the ultimate strength of axially loaded uni-planar X-joints. In: Proceedings of the 9th international symposium and Euro conference on tubular structures, Düsseldorf, 3–5 April.
25.
WangYMShaoYBSongSZet al. (2017) Static test on failure process of tubular T-joints with initial fatigue crack. Steel and Composite Structures24(5): 615–633.
26.
WardenierJKurobaneKPackerJAet al. (2008) Design Guide for Circular Hollow Section (CHS) Joints Under Predominantly Static Loading. 2nd ed.Köln: TÜV Rheinland.
27.
ZerbstUHeerensJSchwalbeKH (2002) The fracture behavior of a welded tubular joint—an ESIS TC1.3 round robin on failure assessment methods: Part I: experimental data base and brief summary of the results. Engineering Fracture Mechanics69(10): 1093–1110.
