The seismic performance of three-dimensional moment-resisting timber frames with frictional damping devices was investigated experimentally. This article describes a novel three-dimensional beam-to-column connection which was designed to behave rigidly up to moderate seismic intensities and to start the frictional dissipating behavior at higher intensities. The three-dimensional beam-to-column connection component was initially tested under cyclic loading, and then the connection was mounted in a three-level prototype frame and tested on a shake table. From the cyclic loading tests, the energy dissipation of the proposed beam-to-column connection was higher than the equivalent rigid connection. The frame demonstrated self-aligning capabilities without permanent drift at seismic intensities up to 1.4 g and maintained strength up to high seismic intensities of 2 g. Because wood frames allow for large elastic deflections and can exhibit excellent self-aligning capabilities (i.e., connections tolerate large rotations within safe stress levels), the proposed frictional beam-to-column connection is a promising alternative for moment-resisting timber frames that can be used to prevent structural members from reaching critical stresses.
ASCE/SEI 7-10 (2010) Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
2.
BlassHJCeccottiADyrbyeCet al. (1994) Timber structures in seismic regions RILEM state-of-the-art report. Materials and Structures27(3): 157–184.
3.
BooreDM (2005) On pads and filters: processing strong-motion data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America95(2): 745–750.
4.
BooreDMBommerJJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering25(2): 93–115.
5.
BuchananAHFairweatherRH (1993) Seismic design of glulam structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering26(4): 415–436.
6.
CliftonGC (2005) Semi-rigid joints for moment-resisting steel framed seismic-resisting systems. Master’s Thesis, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
7.
Di CesareAPonzoFCNigroDet al. (2017) Shaking table testing of post-tensioned timber frame building with passive energy dissipation systems. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering15: 4475–4498.
8.
DIN EN 10025-2:2004 (2004) Warmgewalzte Erzweugnisse aus Baustahl—Teil 2: Technische Lieferbedingungen für unlegierte Baustähle. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normungen e.V., Beuth.
9.
DIN EN 12512:2005 (2005) Holzbauwerke—Prüfverfahren—Zyklische Prüfungen von Anschlüssen mit mechanischen Verbindungsmitteln. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normungen e.V., Beuth.
10.
DIN EN 1995-1-1:2010 (2010) Eurocode 5: Design of Timber Structures—Part 1-1: General—Common Rules and Common Rules for Building. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normungen e.V., Beuth.
11.
DIN EN 1998-1-1:2004/AC:2010 (2010) Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Normungen e.V., Beuth.
12.
DuffSBlackRMahinSet al. (1998) Friction-damped energy dissipating timber connections. In: Proceedings of the 5th world conference on timber engineering, Montreux, 17–20 August, pp. 361–368. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
13.
FiliatraultA (1990) Analytical predictions of the seismic response of friction damped timber shear walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics19(2): 259–273.
14.
GledhillSSidewellGKhooHHet al. (2013) Steel moment frames with sliding hinge joints—lessons learnt during implementation. In: Steel innovations conference, Christchurch, New Zealand, 21–22 February.
15.
GrigorianCEPopovEP (1994) Energy Dissipation with Slotted Bolted Connections. Richmond, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
HeiduschkeA (2005) Seismic behavior of moment-resisting timber frames with densified and textile reinforced connections. Doctoral Dissertation, Fakultät Bauingenieurwesen, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden.
18.
IEEE 693-2005 (2005) IEEE Recommended Practice for Seismic Design of Substations. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers.
19.
JamilMQuennevillePCliftonCet al. (eds) (2012) Low-damage moment resisting timber multi-storey buildings. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on timber engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 16–19 July, pp. 367–376. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
20.
KasalBGuindosPPolocoserTet al. (2014) Heavy laminated timber frames with rigid three-dimensional beam-to-column connections. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities28(6): A4014014.
21.
KasalBPospisilSJirovskyIet al. (2004) Seismic performance of laminated timber frames with fiber reinforced joints. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics33(5): 633–646.
22.
KellermannRKleinHC (1955) Untersuchungen über den Einfluß der Reibung auf Vorspannung und Anzugsmoment von Schraubenverbindungen. Konstruktion7(2): 54–68.
23.
LeijtenAJRuxtonSPrionHet al. (2006) Reversed-cyclic behavior of a novel heavy timber tube connection. Journal of Structural Engineering132(8): 1314–1319.
24.
LooWYChouwNQuennevilleP (2012a) A ‘shim-less’ slotted bolt energy dissipating connector. In: 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon, 24–28 September.
25.
LooWYQuennevillePChouwN (2012b) A numerical study of the seismic behaviour of timber shear walls with slip-friction connectors. Engineering Structures34: 233–243.
26.
MonirHSZeynaliK (2013) A modified friction damper for diagonal bracing of structures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research87: 17–30.
27.
MuallaIHBelevB (2002) Performance of steel frames with a new friction damper device under earthquake excitation. Engineering Structures24(3): 365–371.
28.
PallASMarshC (1982) Response of friction damped braced frames. Journal of Structural Engineering108(9): 1313–1323.
29.
PopovVL (2010) Kontaktmechanik und Reibung: von der Nanotribologie bis zur Erdbebendynamik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
30.
TjahyadiA (2001) Slotted-bolted friction damper as a seismic-energy dissipater in a braced timber-frame. Master’s Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
31.
VenutiWJ (1976) Energy absorption of high strength bolted connections. Test report, Structural Steel Education Council, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, May.
