This article proposes an improved multi-scale principal component analysis approach to
recover the structural dynamic response in the time domain from data measured by
performance-deteriorated sensors. The proposed approach builds on discrete wavelet
transform, principal component analysis, and inverse discrete wavelet transform. The main
approach is based on a cross-correlation calculation to better preserve the true
structural vibration behavior as well as to recover the structural response from data
measured by deteriorated sensors. Three sensor performance degradation models are
considered in this study. Numerical studies are conducted first to demonstrate the
effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed approach to recover the structural vibration
response of an example spatial truss model considering sensor performance degradation
under different loading scenarios. Experimental data on an in-field benchmark bridge are
also analyzed to further validate and demonstrate the performance of the proposed
approach.
AokiM (2013) State Space Modeling of Time Series.
London:
Springer.
2.
BartlettMSMovellanJRSejnowskiTJ (2002) Face recognition by independent
component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural
Networks13(6):
1450–1464.
3.
Di NataleCMartinelliED’AmicoA (2002) Counteraction of environmental
disturbances of electronic nose data by independent component analysis.
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical82(2):
158–165.
4.
DingYLLiAQMiaoCQ (2006) Investigation on the structural damage
alarming method based on wavelet packet energy spectrum.
Engineering Mechanics23(8):
42–48.
5.
HeJGuanXLiuY (2012) Structural response reconstruction
based on empirical mode decomposition in time domain. Mechanical
Systems and Signal Processing28: 348–366.
6.
HinesELBoilotPGardnerJWet al. (2002) Pattern analysis for electronic
noses. In: PearceTCSchiffmanSSNagleHTet al. (eds) Handbook of Machine Olfaction: Electronic Nose
Technology. Hoboken, NJ: John
Wiley & Sons, pp.
133–160.
7.
HuangDLeungH (2009) Reconstruction of drifting sensor
responses based on Papoulis-Qerchberg method. IEEE Sensors
Journal9(5):
595–604.
8.
HuangSMYangJF (2012) Kernel linear regression for low
resolution face recognition under variable illumination. In:
Proceeding of the IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and
signal processing, Kyoto, Japan, 25–30
March, pp. 1945–1948. New
York: IEEE.
9.
JiangSFFuDBMaSLet al. (2013) Structural novelty detection based on
adaptive consensus data fusion algorithm and wavelet analysis.
Advances in Structural Engineering16(1):
189–206.
10.
JiangSFWuSYDongLQ (2014) A time-domain structural damage
detection method based on improved multiparticle swarm coevolution optimization
algorithm. Mathematical Problems in Engineering2014: 232763.
11.
KammerDC (1997) Estimation of structural response using
remote sensor locations. Journal of Guidance, Control and
Dynamics20(3):
501–508.
12.
KullaaJ (2011) Distinguishing between sensor fault,
structural damage, and environmental or operational effects in structural health
monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing25(8):
2976–2989.
13.
KullaaJ (2013) Detection, identification, and
quantification of sensor fault in a sensor network. Mechanical
Systems and Signal Processing40(1):
208–221.
14.
LawSSLiJDingY (2011) Structural response reconstruction with
transmissibility concept in frequency domain. Mechanical Systems
and Signal Processing25(3):
952–968.
15.
LiHLiSOuJPet al. (2010) Modal identification of bridges under
varying environmental conditions: temperature and wind effects.
Structural Control & Health Monitoring17(5):
495–512.
16.
LiJHaoH (2014) Substructure damage identification
based on wavelet domain response reconstruction. Structural
Health Monitoring13(4):
389–405.
17.
LiJLawSS (2011) Substructural response reconstruction
in wavelet domain. Journal of Applied Mechanics78(4):
041010.1–041010.10.
18.
LiJLawSS (2012) Substructural damage detection with
incomplete information of the structure. Journal of Applied
Mechanics79(4):
041003.1–041003.10.
19.
LimongelliMP (2003) Optimal location of sensors for
reconstruction of seismic responses through spline function
interpolation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural
Dynamics32(7):
1055–1074.
20.
MaSLWengLQJiangSF (2013) Distinguishing between sensor
deterioration and structural damage. Journal of Southwest
Jiaotong University48(6): 1024–1030 (in
Chinese).
21.
MaXVakakisAFBergmanLA (2001) Karhunen-Loeve modes of a truss:
transient response reconstruction and experimental verification.
AIAA Journal39(4):
687–696.
22.
MaceBRHalkyardCR (2000) Time domain estimation of response and
intensity in beams using wave decomposition and reconstruction.
Journal of Sound and Vibration230(3):
561–589.
23.
MallatS (1999) A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing.
Burlington, MA: Academic
Press.
24.
MarxMLLarsenRJ (2006) Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and
Its Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
25.
NewmarkNW (1959) A method of computation for structural
dynamics. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division85(3):
67–94.
26.
PadillaMPereraAMontoliuIet al. (2010) Fault detection, identification, and
reconstruction of faulty chemical gas sensors under drift conditions, using principal
component analysis and multiscale-PCA. In: Proceeding of the
international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN),
Barcelona, 18–23 July, pp.
1–7. New York:
IEEE.
27.
RibeiroAMRSilvaJMMMaiaNMM (2000) On the generalisation of the
transmissibility concept. Mechanical Systems and Signal
Processing14(1):
29–35.
28.
SongXJiTWyrwiczAM (2008) Baseline drift and physiological noise
removal in high field fMRI data using kernel PCA. In:
Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and
signal processing (ICASSP), Las Vegas, NV,
31 March–4 April, pp. 441–444.
New York:
IEEE.
29.
UrgueiraAPAlmeidaRAMaiaNM (2011) On the use of the transmissibility
concept for the evaluation of frequency response functions.
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing25(3):
940–951.
30.
WangQDengX (1999) Damage detection with spatial
wavelets. International Journal of Solids and
Structures36(23):
3443–3468.
31.
WuHSiegelMKhoslaP (1998) Vehicle sound signature recognition by
frequency vector principal component analysis. In:
Proceedings of the instrumentation and measurement technology
conference, St. Paul, MN, 18–25
May, vol. 1, pp. 429–434.
New York:
IEEE.
32.
XieYXChenXGZhaoJ (2011) Data fault detection for wireless
sensor networks using multi-scale PCA method. In: Proceedings
of the 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence, management science and
electronic commerce (AIMSEC), Dengfeng, China,
8–10 August, pp. 7035–7038.
New York:
IEEE.
33.
ZuppaMDistanteCPersaudKCet al. (2007) Recovery of drifting sensor responses
by means of DWT analysis. Sensors and Actuators B:
Chemical120(2):
411–416.
