This article presents an experimental study on two innovative types of cast steel connectors, which would be used as a replaceable energy-dissipating component in the beam-to-column joint. The main aim was to use the connectors as the main source of deformation and energy dissipation, and to realize rapid repair of the joints by simple replacement of these connectors after earthquakes. A total of eight cyclic tests under two loading procedures were conducted on three types of connectors, namely, traditional welded T-stubs W, C1 type cast steel connectors, and C2 type cast steel connectors. The new cast steel connector specimens were observed to have good energy dissipation capacity with stable and plump hysteretic curves, and the equivalent viscous damping could achieve up to 43.7%. The ductility, which was governed by fracture of energy-dissipating elements, was shown to be satisfactory. The L/t ratio (the length of energy-dissipating element to its thickness ratio) was found to be an important factor influencing the cyclic performances of C2 connectors. The accumulated plastic damage of C2 connector caused by bidirectional reversed tension and compression actions did not significantly weaken its energy dissipation capacity, which demonstrated the feasibility of employing C2 connector only in the beam bottom flange of a beam-to-column joint.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) (2005) Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. Chicago, IL: AISC.
2.
BarsomJMPellegrinoJVJr (2002) Failure analysis of welded steel moment-resisting frame connections. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering14(1): 24–34.
3.
BrettCLuY (2013) Assessment of robustness of structures: current state of research. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering7(4): 356–368.
4.
ChenYYZhaoXZTongLW (2008) Experimental research and design for regular and irregular cast steel joints in tubular structures. In: Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on tubular structures (ed ShenZY.), Tongji University, Shanghai, China, Taylor & Francis, 8–10 October, pp. 499–506.
5.
ChenYYZhaoXZTongLW (2010) Research and application of connections of structural steel casting. Advances in Structural Engineering13(3): 441–452.
6.
De OliveiraJPackerJAChristopoulosC (2008) Cast steel connectors for circular hollow section braces under inelastic cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering: ASCE134(3): 374–383.
7.
Eurocode 3 (2005) Design of Steel Structures, Part 1–8: Design of Joints. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
8.
FangCIzzuddinBAElghazouliAY. (2013) Modeling of semi-rigid beam-to-column steel joints under extreme loading. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering7(3): 245–263.
9.
FleischmanRBSumerA (2006) Optimum arm geometry for ductile modular connectors. Journal of Structural Engineering: ASCE132(5): 705–716.
10.
FleischmanRBLiXPanY. (2007) Cast modular panel zone node for steel special moment frames, I: analytical development. Journal of Structural Engineering: ASCE133(10): 1393–1403.
11.
FukumotoT (1993) A study on concrete-filled square tube column to steel-beam connections reinforced by cast steel parts. In: Proceedings of the dissertation of the conference of Architectural Institute of Japan, Japan, pp. 1807–1808.
12.
Girão CoelhoAMBijlaardFSGresnigtN. (2004) Experimental assessment of the behaviour of bolted T-stub connections made up of welded plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research60(2): 269–311.
13.
GrayMGChristopoulosCPackerJA (2010) Cast steel yielding fuse for concentrically braced frames. In: Proceedings of the 9th US national and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada, 25–29 July, paper no. 595.
14.
HerionSde OliveiraJPackerJA. (2010) Castings in tubular structures—the state of the art. Proceedings of the ICE: Structures and Buildings163(6): 403–415.
15.
HuJWKimDKLeonRT. (2011) Analytical studies of full-scale steel T-stub connections using delicate 3D finite element methods. ISIJ International51(4): 619–629.
16.
IannoneFLatourMPilusoV. (2011) Experimental analysis of bolted steel beam-to-column connections: component identification. Journal of Earthquake Engineering15(2): 214–244.
17.
JGJ 82-2011 (2011) Technical Specification for High Strength Bolt Connections for Steel Structures. Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press (in Chinese).
18.
KasaiKBleimanD (1996) Bolted brackets for repair of damaged steel moment frame connections. In: Proceedings of the 7th US–Japan workshop on the improvement of structural design and construction practices: lessons learned from Northridge and Kobe, Kobe, Japan, 18–20 January.
19.
KhooHHCliftonCButterworthJ. (2013) Experimental study of full-scale self-centering sliding hinge joint connections with friction ring springs. Journal of Earthquake Engineering17(7): 972–997.
20.
KhooHHCliftonCMacraeG. (2014) Proposed design models for the asymmetric friction connection. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics44: 1309–1324.
21.
LatourMRizzanoG (2011) Experimental behavior and mechanical modeling of dissipative T-stub connections. Journal of Structural Engineering: ASCE138(2): 170–182.
22.
LatourMRizzanoG (2015a) Cyclic behavior and modeling of a dissipative connector for cross-laminated timber panel buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering19(1): 137–171.
23.
LatourMRizzanoG (2015b) Design of X-shaped double split tee joints accounting for moment–shear interaction. Journal of Constructional Steel Research104: 115–126.
24.
LatourMPilusoVRizzanoG (2011) Cyclic modeling of bolted beam-to-column connections: component approach. Journal of Earthquake Engineering15(4): 537–563.
25.
LatourMPilusoVRizzanoG (2014) Experimental analysis on friction materials for supplemental damping devices. Construction and Building Materials65: 159–176.
26.
LatourMPilusoVRizzanoG (2015) Free from damage beam-to-column joints: testing and design of DST connections with friction pads. Engineering Structures85: 219–233.
27.
MahinSA (1998) Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the Northridge earthquake. Engineering Structures20(4): 261–270.
28.
MaisonBFRexCOLindseySD. (2000) Performance of PR moment frame buildings in UBC seismic zones 3 and 4. Journal of Structural Engineering: ASCE126(1): 108–116.
29.
NakashimaMInoueKTadaM (1998) Classification of damage to steel buildings observed in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Engineering Structures20(4): 271–281.
30.
ParkRPaulayT (1975) Reinforced Concrete Structures. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
31.
PilusoVRizzanoG (2008) Experimental analysis and modelling of bolted T-stubs under cyclic loads. Journal of Constructional Steel Research64(6): 655–669.
32.
PrinzGSNussbaumerABorgesL. (2014) Experimental testing and simulation of bolted beam-column connections having thick extended endplates and multiple bolts per row. Engineering Structures59: 434–447.
33.
SwansonJALeonRT (2000) Bolted steel connections: tests on T-stub components. Journal of Structural Engineering: ASCE126(1): 50–56.
34.
WeynandKJaspartJSteenhuisM (1995) The stiffness model of revised Annex J of Eurocode 3. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on connections (ed BjorhovdeR.), Oxford, Pergamon Press, 29–31 May, pp. 441–452.
35.
WhittakerASBerteroVVThompsonC (1989) Earthquake Simulator Testing of Steel Plate Added Damping and Stiffness Elements. Berkeley, CA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
36.
WhittakerASBerteroVVThompsonCL. (1991) Seismic testing of steel plate energy dissipation devices. Earthquake Spectra7(4): 563–604.
