This article presents a distributed damage identification approach based on dynamic response sensitivity of the moving vehicle. Numerical studies are carried out on a simply supported beam and a continuous two-span bridge under a vehicle with nonlinear springs for identification of distributed damage due to the cracks. Combined Newmark direct integration method and Runge–Kutta method are used to calculate the dynamic responses of the coupled bridge–vehicle system. The numerical results show that the distributed damage(s) can be identified accurately by the measured acceleration data of four virtual moving acceleration sensors and it is insensitive to the measurement noise.
Abdel WahabMMDe RoeckGPeetersB (1999) Parameterization of damage in reinforced concrete structures using model updating. Journal of Sound and Vibration228(4): 717–730.
2.
AnYOuJ (2013) Experimental and numerical studies on model updating method of damage severity identification utilizing four cost functions. Structural Control and Health Monitoring20(1): 107–120.
3.
CardenEPFanningP (2004) Vibration based condition monitoring: a review. Structural Health Monitoring3(4): 355–377.
4.
CawleyPAdamsRD (1979) The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design14(2): 49–57.
5.
ChatterjeeA (2010) Structural damage assessment in a cantilever beam with a breathing crack using higher order frequency response functions. Journal of Sound and Vibration329(16): 3325–3334.
6.
ChaudhariTDMaitiSK (1999) Modelling of transverse vibration of beam of linearly variable depth with edge crack. Engineering Fracture Mechanics63(4): 425–445.
7.
ChoiSStubbsN (2004) Damage identification in structures using the time-domain response. Journal of Sound and Vibration275(3): 577–590.
8.
DoeblingSWFarrarCRPrimeMB. (1998) A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. Shock and Vibration Digest30(2): 91–105.
9.
DoukaEBamniosGTrochidisA (2004) A method for determining the location and depth of cracks in double-cracked beams. Applied Acoustics65(10): 997–1008.
10.
HansenPC (1992) Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve. SIAM Review34(4): 561–580.
11.
HeZYLuZR (2010) Time domain identification of multiple cracks in a beam. Structural Engineering and Mechanics: An International Journal42: 13–24.
12.
LeeJWKimJDYunCB. (2002) Health-monitoring method for bridges under ordinary traffic loadings. Journal of Sound and Vibration257(2): 247–264.
13.
LeleSPMaitiSK (2002) Modelling of transverse vibration of short beams for crack detection and measurement of crack extension. Journal of Sound and Vibration257(3): 559–583.
14.
LuQRenGZhaoY (2002) Multiple damage location with flexibility curvature and relative frequency change for beam structures. Journal of Sound and Vibration253(5): 1101–1114.
15.
LuXBLiuJKLuZR (2013) A two-step approach for crack identification in beam. Journal of Sound and Vibration332(2): 282–293.
16.
LuZRLawSS (2007) Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection. Journal of Sound and Vibration303(1): 305–329.
17.
MachavaramRShankarK (2012) Structural damage identification using improved RBF neural networks in frequency domain. Advances in Structural Engineering15(10): 1689–1704.
18.
MajumdarAMaitiDKMaityD (2013) Damage assessment of beams from changes in natural frequencies using ant colony optimization. Structural Engineering and Mechanics: An International Journal45: 391–410.
19.
MajumderLManoharCS (2003) A time-domain approach for damage detection in beam structures using vibration data with a moving oscillator as an excitation source. Journal of Sound and Vibration268(4): 699–716.
20.
PandeyAKBiswasM (1994) Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility. Journal of Sound and Vibration169(1): 3–17.
21.
PandeyAKBiswasMSammanMM (1991) Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes. Journal of Sound and Vibration145(2): 321–332.
22.
TikhonovAM (1963) On the solution of ill-posed problems and the method of regularization. Soviet Mathematics4: 1035–1038.
23.
WangXJZhaoXQXiaY. (2013) Comparisons between modal-parameter-based and flexibility-based damage identification methods. Advances in Structural Engineering16(9): 1611–1620.
24.
YangY-BLinCWYauJD (2004) Extracting bridge frequencies from the dynamic response of a passing vehicle. Journal of Sound and Vibration272(3): 471–493.
25.
ZhuHPMaoLWengS (2013) Calculation of dynamic response sensitivity to substructural damage identification under moving load. Advances in Structural Engineering16(9): 1621–1632.
