Most finite element models of actual projects established in general finite element software are rigidly connected or connected by hinge joints. Member imperfection cannot be considered in such models, which is inconsistent with the actual situation in most projects. To estimate the influences of joint stiffness and member imperfection on the mechanical behavior of latticed shell structures, double elements and imperfect members were combined in this study. First, the accuracies of double elements and imperfect members were validated. Then, they were combined to establish imperfect elements with semi-rigid joints. The accuracy of imperfect elements with semi-rigid joints was also validated, and the relationship between joint stiffness and that of double elements was deduced. The findings validated that imperfect elements with semi-rigid joints could consider semi-rigid joints and imperfect members simultaneously and with high accuracy. In addition, imperfect elements with semi-rigid joints could be constructed conveniently in general finite element software.
AdmanRAfraH (2007) Exact shape functions of imperfect beam element for stability analysis. Advances in Engineering Software38(8–9): 576–585.
2.
ANSYS Inc. (2003) ANSYS Multiphysics 10.0. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS Inc.
3.
BaiLAhmer WadeeM (2015) Mode interaction in thin-walled I-section struts with semi-rigid flange–web joints. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics69: 71–83.
4.
ChanSLZhouZH (1995) Second-order elastic analysis of frames using single imperfect element per member. Journal of Structural Engineering: ASCE121(6): 939–945.
ChenZHLiuHBWangXD. (2011) Establishing and application of cable-sliding criterion equation. Advanced Steel Construction7(2): 131–143.
7.
ChenZHQinYLZhaoJB. (2006) An experimental study on rigid suspendome structures. China Civil Engineering Journal39(9): 47–53.
8.
Da SilvaJGSde LimaLROda Silva VellascoPCG. (2008) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel portal frames with semi-rigid connections. Engineering Structures30(9): 2566–2579.
9.
DabaonMAEl-BoghdadiMHKharoobOF (2009) Experimental and numerical model for space steel and composite semi-rigid joints. Journal of Constructional Steel Research65(8–9): 1864–1875.
FanFMaHCaoZ. (2011) A new classification system for the joints used in lattice shells. Thin-Walled Structures49(12): 1544–1553.
12.
FathelbabFA (1987) The Effect of Joints on the Stability of Shallow Single Layer Lattice Domes. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
13.
GilBGoñiRBayoE (2013) Experimental and numerical validation of a new design for three-dimensional semi-rigid composite joints. Engineering Structures48: 55–69.
14.
GuoJMDongSLYuanXF (2008) Morphological analysis of suspendome structures and practical analysis method. China Civil Engineering Journal41(2): 1–7.
15.
GuoXXiongZLuoY. (2015) Experimental investigation on the semi-rigid behaviour of aluminium alloy gusset joints. Thin-Walled Structures87: 30–40.
16.
JGJ61-2003 (2003) Technical Specification for Latticed Shells. Beijing, China: China Architecture & Building Press.
17.
KangWJChenZHLamHF. (2003) Analysis and design of the general and outmost-ring stiffened suspen-dome structures. Engineering Structures25(3): 1685–1695.
18.
KatoSMutohIShomuraM (1998) Collapse of semi-rigidly jointed reticulated domes with initial geometric imperfections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research48(2–3): 145–168.
19.
KitipornchaiSKangWLamH-F. (2005) Factors affecting the design and construction of Lamella suspen-dome systems. Journal of Constructional Steel Research61(6): 764–785.
20.
LarsenHJJensenJL (2000) Influence of semi-rigidity of joints on the behaviour of timber structures. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials2(3): 267–277.
21.
LemonisMEGantesCJ (2009) Mechanical modeling of the nonlinear response of beam-to-column joints. Journal of Constructional Steel Research65(4): 879–890.
22.
LiGQLiuYS (2005) A nonlinear beam element considering initial imperfection. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics22(1): 69–72.
23.
LopezAPuenteISernaMA (2007a) Direct evaluation of the buckling loads of semi-rigidly jointed single-layer latticed domes under symmetric loading. Engineering Structures29(1): 101–109.
24.
LopezAPuenteISernaMA (2007b) Numerical model and experimental tests on single-layer latticed domes with semi-rigid joints. Computers and Structures85(7): 360–374.
25.
LoureiroAGoniRBayoE (2002) A one-step method for buckling analysis of single layer latticed structures with semi-rigid connections (Gerard Parke). In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of Space Structures. London: Thomas Telford, pp. 1481–1490.
26.
MaHHFanFShenSZ (2008) Numerical parametric investigation of single-layer latticed domes with semi-rigid joints. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures49(2): 99–110.
27.
MaHHFanFChenG. (2013a) Numerical analyses of semi-rigid joints subjected to bending with and without axial force. Journal of Constructional Steel Research90: 13–28.
28.
MaHHFanFZhongJ. (2013b) Stability analysis of single-layer elliptical paraboloid latticed shells with semi-rigid joints. Thin-Walled Structures72: 128–138.
29.
MaHHFanFWenP. (2015) Experimental and numerical studies on a single-layer cylindrical reticulated shell with semi-rigid joints. Thin-Walled Structures86: 1–9.
30.
RamiresFBde AndradeSALda Silva VellascoPCG. (2012) Genetic algorithm optimization of composite and steel endplate semi-rigid joints. Engineering Structures45: 177–191.
31.
ShiGBanHBaiY. (2013) A novel cast aluminum joint for reticulated shell structures: experimental study and modeling. Advances in Structural Engineering16(6): 1047–1060.
32.
UrbonasKDaniūnasA (2006) Behaviour of semi-rigid steel beam-to-beam joints under bending and axial forces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research62(12): 1244–1249.
33.
ZhouZWuJMengS (2014) Influence of member geometric imperfection on geometrically nonlinear buckling and seismic performance of suspen-dome structures. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics14(3): 1–20.
