Status Signalling in the Indo-Pacific: Strategic Spinning,Military Posturing,and Vaccine Diplomacy

Abstract

The Indo-Pacific region has emerged as a critical geopolitical platform. Can major powers and regional states avoid conflict? This article explores the concept of status signalling to better understand the region. Status signalling aims to demonstrate a state’s preferred ranking in international society. By applying this concept to new empirical domains, the article shows how status signalling offers fresh insights into regional trends. As an example of strategic spinning, the emergence of the Indo-Pacific reshapes strategic thinking and diplomatic practice in the 21st century. While countries may engage in military posturing to signal their preferred status, the rising competition in the region is not always a zero-sum game. Countries can signal status by providing international public goods in non-military domains. The United States and China need to find ways to handle the potential problem of status dilemmas. Meanwhile, all countries should prudently manage competing expectations from multiple audiences.

Keywords

China Indo-Pacific military posturing signalling status status signalling strategic spinning US vaccine diplomacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abe

(2007) ‘Confluence of the Two Seas’ Speech by H.E.Mr. Shinzo Abe, Prime Minister of Japan at the Parliament of the Republic of India. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Available at: https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/pmv0708/speech-2.html (accessed 10 January 2024).

Allison

(2017) Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Australian Department of Defense (2013) Defense White Paper 2013. Available at: https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:%22library/lcatalog/00541739%22 (accessed 10 January 2024).

Brooks

Ikenberry

Wohlforth

(2013) Don’t come home, America: The case against retrenchment. International Security 37(3): 7–51.

Burges

(2015) Revisiting consensual hegemony: Brazilian regional leadership in question. International Politics 52(2): 193–207.

Carson

Yarhi-Milo

(2017) Covert communication: The intelligibility and credibility of signaling in secret. Security Studies 26(1): 124–156.

Christensen

(2002) The contemporary security dilemma: Deterring a Taiwan conflict. Washington Quarterly 25(4): 7–21.

Christensen

(2009) Shaping the choices of a rising China: Recent lessons for the Obama Administration. Washington Quarterly 32(3): 89–104.

Christensen

(2015) The China Challenge: Shaping the Choices of a Rising Power, 1st edn. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

10.

Chwe

MS-Y

(2013) Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

11.

Dafoe

Renshon

Huth

(2014) Reputation and status as motives for war. Annual Review of Political Science 17: 371–393.

12.

Danielson

Hedling

(2022) Visual diplomacy in virtual summitry: Status signalling during the coronavirus crisis. Review of International Studies 48(2): 243–261.

13.

Deng

(2008) China’s Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Duque

(2018) Recognizing international status: A relational approach. International Studies Quarterly 62(3): 577–592.

15.

Entman

(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.

16.

Erickson

Braden Montgomery

Neuman

, et al. (2017) Correspondence: How good are China’s antiaccess/area-denial capabilities? International Security 41(4): 202–213.

17.

Eyre

Suchman

(1996) Status, norms, and the proliferation of conventional weapons: An institutional theory approach. In: Katzenstein

(ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, pp.79–113.

18.

Fearon

(1994) Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review 88(3): 577–592.

19.

Fearon

(2011) Two states, two types, two actions. Security Studies 20(3): 431–440.

20.

Frank

(1988) Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

21.

Fravel

(2020) China’s ‘world-class military’ ambitions: Origins and implications. Washington Quarterly 43(1): 85–99.

22.

Freeman

(2021) Reading Kindleberger in Beijing: Xi Jinping’s China as a provider of global public goods. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 23(2): 297–318.

23.

Gan

Lendon

(2022) China launches third, most advanced aircraft carrier named ‘Fujian’. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/17/china/china-new-aircraft-carrier-fujian-launch-intl-hnk/index.html (accessed 10 January 2024).

24.

Gilady

(2017) The Price of Prestige: Conspicuous Waste in International Relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Gilpin

(1981) War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

26.

Glazer

Konrad

(1996) A signaling explanation for charity. The American Economic Review 86(4): 1019–1028.

27.

Goffman

(1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, revised edn. New York: Anchor Books.

28.

Hall

Ross

AAG

(2015) Affective politics after 9/11. International Organization 69(4): 847–879.

29.

Haynes

Yoder

(2020) Offsetting uncertainty: Reassurance with two-sided incomplete information. American Journal of Political Science 64(1): 38–51.

30.

Holmes

(2013) The force of face-to-face diplomacy: Mirror neurons and the problem of intentions. International Organization 67(4): 829–861.

31.

Hopkins

Kornienko

(2004) Running to keep in the same place: Consumer choice as a game of status. The American Economic Review 94(4): 1085–1107.

32.

Hotez

(2010) Peace through vaccine diplomacy. Science 327(5971): 1301–1301.

33.

Hotez

(2014) ‘Vaccine diplomacy’: Historical perspectives and future directions. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8(6): e2808.

34.

Huang

(2022) Vaccine diplomacy is paying off for China. Foreign Affairs, 17 November. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2021-03-11/vaccine-diplomacy-paying-china (accessed 10 January 2024).

35.

Jervis

(1989) The Logic of Images in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.

36.

Jervis

(2017) How Statesmen Think: The Psychology of International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

37.

Johnston

(2007) Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980-2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

38.

Kang

(2022) Still getting Asia wrong: No ‘contain China’ coalition exists. Washington Quarterly 45(4): 79–98.

39.

Krickovic

Chang

(2020) Fears of falling short versus anxieties of decline: Explaining Russia and China’s approach to status-seeking. Chinese Journal of International Politics 13(2): 219–251.

40.

Kydd

(1997) Sheep in sheep’s clothing: Why security seekers do not fight each other. Security Studies 7(1): 114–155.

41.

Kydd

(2000) Trust, reassurance, and cooperation. International Organization 54(2): 325–357.

42.

Lake

(2017) Domination, authority, and the forms of Chinese power. Chinese Journal of International Politics 10(4): 357–382.

43.

Larson

Paul

Wohlforth

(2014) Status and World Order. In: Paul

Larson

Wohlforth

(eds) Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.3–29.

44.

Landini

Sicurelli

(2023) COVAX versus Sinovac: A test for the legitimacy of the World Health Organization in South East Asia. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Epub ahead of print 27 December. DOI: 10.1177/13691481231217427.

45.

Lebow

(2010) Why Nations Fight: Past and Future Motives for War, reissue edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

46.

(2022) The ‘Indo-Pacific’: Intellectual origins and international visions in global contexts. Modern Intellectual History 19(3): 807–833.

47.

Liu

(2020) The recalibration of Chinese assertiveness: China’s responses to the Indo-Pacific challenge. International Affairs 96(1): 9–27.

48.

Liu

Huang

Jin

(2022) China’s vaccine diplomacy and its implications for global health governance. Healthcare 10(7): 1276–1276.

49.

MacDonald

Parent

(2021) The status of status in world politics. World Politics 73(2): 358–391.

50.

McManus

(2014) Fighting words: The effectiveness of statements of resolve in international conflict. Journal of Peace Research 51(6): 726–740.

51.

Mark

Smith-Lovin

Ridgeway

(2009) Why do nominal characteristics acquire status value? A minimal explanation for status construction. American Journal of Sociology 115(3): 832–862.

52.

Mearsheimer

(2013) Why Leaders Lie: The Truth about Lying in International Politics, 1st edn. Oxford University Press.

53.

Medcalf

(2020) Indo-Pacific Empire: China, America and the Contest for the World’s Pivotal Region. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

54.

Modi

(2018) Keynote Speech, at 17th Asia Security Simmit/The IISS SHANGRI-LA Dialogue. Available at: https://www.iiss.org/events/shangri-la-dialogue/shangri-la-dialogue-2018 (accessed 10 January 2024).

55.

Nau

(2002) At Home Abroad: Identity and Power in American Foreign Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

56.

Nye

(2010) American and Chinese power after the financial crisis. Washington Quarterly 33(4): 143–154.

57.

Nye

JSJ

(2017) The Kindleberger Trap. Available at: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-china-kindleberger-trap-by-joseph-s–nye-2017-01 (accessed 10 January 2024).

58.

O’Rourke

(2023) China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities – Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service. Available at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL33153/275 (accessed 10 January 2024).

59.

Patrick

(2022) Dumb ways to buy: Defence ‘shambles’ unveiled – former submariner and senator Rex Patrick. Michael West. Available at: https://michaelwest.com.au/dumb-ways-to-buy-defence-spending-shambles-former-submariner-and-senator-rex-patrick/ (accessed 10 January 2024).

60.

Plagemann

(2025) Introduction to special issue: ‘Foreign policy signaling in the Indo-Pacific: Responses to the US-China rivalry in a multipolar world’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 27(1): 3–19.

61.

Powell

(1993) Guns, butter, and anarchy. The American Political Science Review 87(1): 115–132.

62.

Power

(2021) The can-do power. Foreign Affairs 100(1): 10–24.

63.

(2017) Controversial identity of a rising China. Chinese Journal of International Politics 10(2): 131–149.

64.

(2019) Rebranding China: Contested Status Signaling in the Changing Global Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

65.

(2022) Status dilemma in world politics: An anatomy of the China–India asymmetrical rivalry. Chinese Journal of International Politics 15(3): 227–245.

66.

Putnam

(1988) Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42(3): 427–460.

67.

Quek

(2021) Four costly signaling mechanisms. American Political Science Review 115(2): 537–549.

68.

Røren

(2023) The belligerent bear: Russia, status orders, and war. International Security 47(4): 7–49.

69.

Reich

Lebow

(2014) Good-bye Hegemony!: Power and Influence in the Global System. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

70.

Renshaw

Shalal

Martina

(2021) Biden says China will not surpass US as global leader on his watch. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-biden-china-idAFKBN2BH2ZE/ (accessed 10 January 2024).

71.

Rogin

(2021) The United States Can’t Ignore China’s Vaccine Diplomacy in Latin America. Washington Post, 22 April. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/the-united-states-cant-ignore-chinas-vaccine-diplomacy-in-latin-america/2021/04/22/64f7f12c-a390-11eb-a774-7b47ceb36ee8_story.html (accessed 10 January 2024).

72.

Ross

(2009) China’s naval nationalism. International Security 34(2): 46–81.

73.

Ryall

(2023) Both China and the UK want in, so why is the US reluctant to join the CPTPP? Available at: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3207222/japan-really-wants-us-join-cptpp-politically-weak-biden-isnt-interested (accessed 10 January 2024).

74.

Sartori

(2002) The might of the pen: A reputational theory of communication in international disputes. International Organization 56(1): 121–149.

75.

Scobell

McMahon

Cooper

IIICA

(2015) China’s aircraft carrier program. Naval War College Review 68(4): 65–80.

76.

Shirk

(2007) China: Fragile Superpower. New York NY: Oxford University Press.

77.

Singh

, et al. (2022) India’s neighbourhood vaccine diplomacy during COVID-19 pandemic: Humanitarian and geopolitical perspectives. Journal of Asian & African Studies 58(6): 1021–1037.

78.

Smith

(1991) Codes and conflict: Toward a theory of war as ritual. Theory and Society 20(1): 103–138.

79.

Snyder

(1993) Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition, 50579th edn. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

80.

Swaine

(2021) Chinese views of US decline. China Leadership Monitor 69: 1–21.

81.

Tang

(2009) The security dilemma: A conceptual analysis. Security Studies 18(3): 587–623.

82.

Townshend

(2021) How AUKUS Advances Australia’s Commitment to Collective Defense. PacNet Newsletter (61). Center for Strategic & International Studies: 116–118.

83.

The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China (2019) China’s national defense in the new era. Xinhua. Available at: https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/201907/24/content_WS5d3941ddc6d08408f502283d.html (accessed 10 January 2024).

84.

The US Department of Defense (2019) Indo-Pacific strategy report. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF (accessed 10 January 2024).

85.

The US Department of Defense (2023) 2023 military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2023/Oct/19/2003323409/-1/-1/1/2023-MILITARY-AND-SECURITY-DEVELOPMENTS-INVOLVING-THE-PEOPLES-REPUBLIC-OF-CHINA.PDF (accessed 10 January 2024).

86.

The US Department of State (2023) COVID-19 vaccine donations. Available at: https://www.state.gov/covid-19-recovery/vaccine-deliveries/ (accessed 10 January 2024).

87.

The White House (2021) US strategic framework for the Indo-Pacific. Available at: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/IPS-Final-Declass.pdf (accessed 10 January 2024).

88.

The White House (2022a) National Security Strategy, 2022, October. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Biden-Harris-Administrations-National-Security-Strategy-10.2022.pdf (accessed 10 January 2024).

89.

The White House (2022b) Quad Joint Leaders’ Statement. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/05/24/quad-joint-leaders-statement/ (accessed 10 January 2024).

90.

The White House (2022c) The Indo-Pacific strategy of the United States. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/U.S.-Indo-Pacific-Strategy.pdf (accessed 10 January 2024).

91.

Tingley

Walter

(2011) Can cheap talk deter?: An experimental analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(6): 996–1020.

92.

Torode

Baptista

Kelly

(2023) China’s aircraft carriers play ‘theatrical’ role but pose little threat yet. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/chinas-aircraft-carriers-play-theatrical-role-pose-little-threat-yet-2023-05-05/ (accessed 10 January 2024).

93.

Tung

(2022) US-China COVID-19 vaccine diplomacy competition in Vietnam: Where vaccines go, influence may follow. Australian Journal of International Affairs 76(6): 653–671.

94.

van der Westhuizen

(2021) Status signaling and the risk of domestic opposition: Comparing South Africa and Brazil’s hosting of the 2010 and 2014 World Cups. Foreign Policy Analysis 17(3): orab004.

95.

Veblen

(2009) The Theory of the Leisure Class, reissued. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

96.

Waltz

(1979) Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

97.

Wang

(2019) Destined for misperception? Status dilemma and the early origin of US-China antagonism. Journal of Chinese Political Science 24(1): 49–65.

98.

Ward

(2022) Decline and disintegration: National status loss and domestic conflict in post-disaster Spain. International Security 46(4): 91–129.

99.

Wohlforth

(2014) Status dilemmas and inter-state conflict. In: Paul

Larson

Wohlforth

(eds) Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.115–140.

100.

(2020) ‘Fighting COVID-19 through solidarity and cooperation building a global community of health for all’ statement by H.E. Xi Jinping President of the People’s Republic of China At Virtual Event of Opening of the 73rd World Health Assembly. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, People’s Republic of China. Available at: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/zyjh_665391/202005/t20200518_678859.html (accessed 10 January 2024).

101.

(2022) Hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics and strive in unity to build a modern socialist country in all respects: Report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. Xinhua. Available at: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjdt_665385/zyjh_665391/202005/t20200518_678859.html (accessed 10 January 2024).

102.

Yoder

Spaniel

(2022) Costly concealment: Secret foreign policymaking, transparency, and credible reassurance. International Organization 76(4): 868–900.

103.

Zhang

Buzan

(2012) The tributary system as international society in theory and practice. Chinese Journal of International Politics 5(1): 3–36.